New York prosecutor engaging in legal trolling. That is what makes the NRA complaint a tragic irony. If taking power to benefit yourself rather than your organization is the measure, the complaint could indict herself. Her demand to dissolve the NRA in order to pander to voters undermines the case presented by her office. While dissolution is simply absurd, James shows us absurdity and popularity can often move hand in hand in New York politics.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-BB17JhLS
Many organizations have suffered dubious spending by officers, ranging from political parties to nonprofits to universities. None were disbanded. Union and religious leaders are often accused of lavish spending on their travel or other job perks. Few have been prosecuted. The National Action Network of Al Sharpton paid him more than $1 million in compensation in 2018 and another $500,000 for rights to his life story. While it is based in New York, James has not tried to dissolve it or other organizations.
As we witness these creatures the root is Schwartz Gyorgy and His Teacher Karl Popper.
So here we are as already known in from a logical standpoint they proffer if one finds an observation that does not contradict a law, it does not mean that the law is true. A verification has no value in itself. But, if the law makes risky predictions and these are corroborated, Popper says, there is a reason to prefer this law over another law that makes less risky predictions or no predictions at all.In the definition of falsifiability, contradictions with observations are not used for actual falsifications, but for logical "falsifications" that show that the law makes risky predictions, which is completely different.
On the basic philosophical side of this issue, Popper said that some philosophers of the Vienna Circle had mixed two different problems, that of meaning and that of demarcation, and had proposed in verificationism a single solution to both: a statement that could not be verified was considered meaningless. In opposition to this view, Popper said that there are meaningful theories that are not scientific, and that, accordingly, a criterion of meaningfulness does not coincide with a criterion of demarcation.
Your being played just as Bush mentioned that damn piece of paper to ignore.
As it was observed also one spent nearly a decade of my life working as a school district administrator - facilities and transportation.
The school principals, teachers, and coaches were some of the dumbest people I have ever encountered in my nearly 1/2 century on this planet. Especially the 'teachers' -- mostly Karens that somehow managed to serve enough time in college or university to earn a piece of paper that certified them to preach the new Gospel of compliance. My conscience finally got the best of me; I had to resign.
However, looking back, I don't regret working there; I had an inside perspective that taught me what to expect in the future. harmonic
Once again we convey that Hume found that there seems to be a significant difference between positive statements (about what is)
and prescriptive or normative statements (about what ought to be), and that it is not obvious how one can coherently move from descriptive statements to prescriptive ones.
Progressivism and relativism serve as the means of achieving the goal of a citizenry with a statist orientation.
I myself had all sorts of fun in college with moral nihilism being distinct from moral relativism, which does allow a moral statements to be true or false in a non-objective sense, but does not assign any static truth to values of a moral statements, and of course moral universalism, which holds moral statements to be objectively true or false. Insofar as only true statements can be known, moral nihilism implies moral skepticism.
Truman was correct in his assertion.
So then, as in September 1, 1945
To: D A MacArthur/C H Nimitz
From: H S Truman
Political Correctness is a doctrine, recently fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and promoted by a sick mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of shit by clean end!
We just started with CNN since we knew the swamp was unable to consider the working people who know and why.
We consider most of the Office fathoms this above cabinet level.
Never fight the tape.
They are not democrats.
Last night one shot in the arm and not face as the Chicongo will not deal with criminals and racist demand crayon box picks.
To bad Martin is nor here to remind then of what is important only.
In god we trust all others bring data. Demming
