Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

[Guest]

DaK, I'm curious of what your opinion is of people who can't make a handle so that interaction can occur back and forth - but more importantly on the fact of not answering facts and conclusions based on them. Only lefties, it seems to me, attack posters on topics not having to do with the points at hand. It's nothing new. You are an intelligent poster. It's funny when people call others, who clearly are very well educated, names and claim they are what they want them to be (losers). That's because the snowflakes can't handle the reality that is pointed out.

I made my opinion on anonymous posters very clear late last year. It is a bad idea, because every anonymous poster has the exact same handle ("Guest,") and consequently it's difficult to tell who is who. Of course, when I stated that opinion I was immediately attacked by a bunch of trolls who accused me of being anti-free speech on that basis alone. And then there was that infamous comment by Burner Prime (one of the most vile trolls I've ever encountered anywhere on the Internet) where he used my opinion on this issue to attack John and accusing him of being a paid agent of people like me.

So "Burner Prime" is like "Cool Breeze" not like "Guest"

[DaKardii]

Obviously he knows your opinion. That's why he asked you and not somebody who thinks having "Guests" is a good idea. It's all about trying to hide behind the fake name "Cool Breeze" while pushing the anti-Semitic agenda.

No comment on his motive, other than I gave him the benefit of the doubt because I stated that opinion almost a year ago.

[DaKardii]

So "Burner Prime" is like "Cool Breeze" not like "Guest"

Yes and no.

Burner Prime is not a registered user, but he nearly always posts under a name that is not "Guest."

Burner Prime also has opinions similar to that of Cool Breeze; but he is far more zealous in those opinions, has far less tolerance for differing opinions, and appears to be far more likely to resort to aggressive actions in the name of his own opinions.

[Guest]

As stated previously, the only success you have happened to achieve is due to your piggybacking off of Jews.

"He can only follow the Jews to their locations, follow their directives and advice, and hope to benefit from their success."

Can you understand that? I guess not! Or you don't want to confront reality!

You should be bowing to the Jews and thanking them for your limited success instead of biting the hand that feeds you.

You should be more clear here. In real life, he is kissing the Jews asses, which is how he got his so-called "success" that he brags about. He is not biting the hands of the Jews in real life. But after kissing the Jews asses in real life he hides behind the handle "Cool Breeze" to try to get others to fight the Jews.

Yes, in real life I believe he has taken the jab. But I believe here that he poses as an anti-jab troll. Believe what you wish I suppose, but that is my belief.

[Guest]

Does he really own any Bitcoins?

[Guest]

Speaking of trolls, I'll also voice my opinion on whether I think you are one, CB. Personally, I'm not sure. But even if you are, you're definitely one of the "better" trolls who one can still have a decent conversation with as long as he or she has the patience for countering that troll's opinions through rational debate. Most of the non-anonymous trolls here fit in that category, with Burner Prime being a major exception. Most of the "worse" trolls where it's virtually impossible for one to have a decent conversation at any time are "Guests," again with Burner Prime being a major exception.

I agree with your characterizations of the "Guests." As one of the "Guests", I try to keep the quality of my posts and the thread consistent with the garbage dump that it is. I would want my posts to be "worse" that those of the "better" troll whose garbage posts are dumped in here. No need to try to elevate the garbage that is dumped in here or make it smell any better than what it is.

[Guest]

Speaking of trolls, I'll also voice my opinion on whether I think you are one, CB. Personally, I'm not sure. But even if you are, you're definitely one of the "better" trolls who one can still have a decent conversation with as long as he or she has the patience for countering that troll's opinions through rational debate. Most of the non-anonymous trolls here fit in that category, with Burner Prime being a major exception. Most of the "worse" trolls where it's virtually impossible for one to have a decent conversation at any time are "Guests," again with Burner Prime being a major exception.

I agree with your characterizations of the "Guests." As one of the "Guests", I try to keep the quality of my posts and the thread consistent with the garbage dump that it is. I would want my posts to be "worse" that those of the "better" troll whose garbage posts are dumped in here. No need to try to elevate the garbage that is dumped in here or make it smell any better than what it is.

Your post was the worst garbage of all.

[Guest]

Speaking of trolls, I'll also voice my opinion on whether I think you are one, CB. Personally, I'm not sure. But even if you are, you're definitely one of the "better" trolls who one can still have a decent conversation with as long as he or she has the patience for countering that troll's opinions through rational debate. Most of the non-anonymous trolls here fit in that category, with Burner Prime being a major exception. Most of the "worse" trolls where it's virtually impossible for one to have a decent conversation at any time are "Guests," again with Burner Prime being a major exception.

I agree with your characterizations of the "Guests." As one of the "Guests", I try to keep the quality of my posts and the thread consistent with the garbage dump that it is. I would want my posts to be "worse" that those of the "better" troll whose garbage posts are dumped in here. No need to try to elevate the garbage that is dumped in here or make it smell any better than what it is.

To be sure this is understood properly, I'm talking about this "Topic" and the posts that the moderator dumps in here from other threads. This comment does not refer to the rest of the forum.

[Cool Breeze]

DaK, I'm curious of what your opinion is of people who can't make a handle so that interaction can occur back and forth - but more importantly on the fact of not answering facts and conclusions based on them. Only lefties, it seems to me, attack posters on topics not having to do with the points at hand. It's nothing new. You are an intelligent poster. It's funny when people call others, who clearly are very well educated, names and claim they are what they want them to be (losers). That's because the snowflakes can't handle the reality that is pointed out.

I made my opinion on anonymous posters very clear late last year. It is a bad idea, because every anonymous poster has the exact same handle ("Guest,") and consequently it's difficult to tell who is who. Of course, when I stated that opinion I was immediately attacked by a bunch of trolls who accused me of being anti-free speech on that basis alone. And then there was that infamous comment by Burner Prime (one of the most vile trolls I've ever encountered anywhere on the Internet) where he used my opinion on this issue to attack John and accusing him of being a paid agent of people like me.

Speaking of trolls, I'll also voice my opinion on whether I think you are one, CB. Personally, I'm not sure. But even if you are, you're definitely one of the "better" trolls who one can still have a decent conversation with as long as he or she has the patience for countering that troll's opinions through rational debate. Most of the non-anonymous trolls here fit in that category, with Burner Prime being a major exception. Most of the "worse" trolls where it's virtually impossible for one to have a decent conversation at any time are "Guests," again with Burner Prime being a major exception.

Good, we're of a similar mind on this issue then, too. Thanks for your response. And no, I'm not a troll, I'm a truth seeker. The truth bothers people, which is why when you see a response to what is considered a controversial post in modern life (a clearly confused, crazy age), you'll notice most of the time it is an emotional lashing out that is accusatory (as these "Guests" do to me). I'm glad you aren't in that camp.

[Cool Breeze]

DaK, check out how crazy these people get.

Now, I'm actually pro-jab (in my real life), and I don't actually own BTC, etc. Next, I'm the ultimate Shabbas Goy! LOL, you can't make this up.

They are so schizophrenic I don't know why anyone would take anything of what they claim to be serious.

My points stand because they are true. Any forensic analysis of economics, media, culture, and real life interaction confirms my position to a T.

They accuse and accuse because they have a different father than I, Bob Bish does the same. That's their game, obfuscate and project on me what they themselves do and they know they are in the wrong, because when the light shines on them they vanish or lash out, since they hate the light (truth).