Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Just another exchange and I hold Lydians coins also in Ounces also who started using coins in the 7th century B.C.
The idiots today print until odious debt claims these swamp idiots in a time bubble who got in with beamed in bastards
and a unholy alliance.
The real news is they will be just like the four city's of old as the warning was and is ignored.
The fullness of time is at hand sooner than l8ter with these distorted things we are warned from older and wiser than us.

http://lydianmint.com/ that are closed now but reminds me of the vanity of life. The coins are not coveted but
for issues these creatures today ignore. Risk.

Cool Breeze wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 12:40 pm

aeden wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 12:38 pm Your completed. Thanks for the donation Cariboo. Your tears will be evaporated and salt used to season the future.
You block chain is infiltrated and your days are numbered. You just to damn lazy to read.

What's your prediction, oracle?

All of our days are numbered. The US government realizes they are squeezing too hard and the productive people are leaving a) first locally and then b) to other jurisdictions entirely. It's going to be funny when they can't tax the productive to buy votes from the incompetent and lazy.

Thanks to bitcoin, I can preserve my wealth and actually take it with me (unlike cash, gold, etc).

John gave you your own topic today for repetitive posts.

http://www.gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=5966

Are you going to go over there to repeat your talking points about Bitcoin, or stay here and continue to hound and name-call people who don't want to hear it "for the hundredth time" as you yourself say?

Why should Aeden give you a prediction or anything else? Who do you think you are, King Tut?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zsqa-YHE36A
Not our first rodeo.
As the files in Portuguese told me from dead Christians.
One family had a few coins to survive to buy a small grinding mill for the survivors
to bake bread in cooperation of humbled peers.
Another was shot for having a Book on His fathers doorstop.
As I was told our rest is assured from issues they cannot fathom
and a peace beyond understanding.

http://www.smie.co/html/cultural_histor ... ians.shtml

context thread Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:12 am: Even if you provide accurate data you will be eaten by that tribe.
Simply they are what we discussed as the proverbial fatal deceit as before.
Hayek knew this as did Keynes since they only differed on the entry point to sort out needed cartels on what you may
remember as the cluster nodes which keep these neo pagans today from eating each other.

Ethics was never a question with many....

I have watched Cities die. We feed the poor and yes we educated some to assist the dying.
We have brought help to the hopeless also.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xT3hPuY8w5M context and the real boss is not done yet with us

Those years prove that it's not a bubble. It has been totally legitimized. But you don't understand Metcalfe's Law, permissionless value being sent easily in a digital world, USD losing its confidence among other things in the US, etc.

I just started posting last year here. I speak about things I have confidence in. What's wrong with that?

You will not even exist when this culminates on issues you cannot comprehend to date.
The democrats just made divide even they cannot see to issues they cannot control.
The reflection they forwarded will be brought to a higher level they cannot focus.

On that day the deaf will hear the words of the scroll, and out of the deep darkness the eyes of the blind will see.

As we have seen the Lion had His wings pulled to Humble Him for issues only time can convey.
The note was given here at the end of the day He got to Hold his Wifes hand.
You missed it not us.

Cool Breeze wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:07 pm Those years prove that it's not a bubble.

You told John only a few days ago that you can't prove to him that Bitcoin is not a bubble. Now you can?

Cool Breeze wrote: Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:50 pm

John wrote: Mon Mar 22, 2021 12:32 pm ** 22-Mar-2021 World View: Everything is a bubble?

I don't think that you actually care, but the following article
describes the analytical method for determining a bubble:

** WSJ's page one story on Bernanke's Princeton 'Bubble Laboratory' is almost incoherent
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ ... tm#e080518


The problem with Bitcoin is that it has no history. The 1929 crash
was entirely predictable because it had many decades of history. The
1987 false panic was not a crash, as could be proven by applying the
analytical method to decades of data.

But in the case of Bitcoin, all we can do is compare it to other
values that had no history, and Tulipomania and the South Sea Bubble
are the obvious choices. Without historical data, and with a
parabolically increasing value, the burden of proof is on the side of
proving that it isn't a bubble, but it obviously is.

Your last statement not only is a logical fallacy, I'll prove it yet again - How do I prove to you that it is not a bubble?

Come on, you are better than this, that's logic 101 and the most utter foolishness.

Higgenbotham wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:24 pm You told John only a few days ago that you can't prove to him that Bitcoin is not a bubble. Now you can?

Obviously, I accept that it isn't a bubble based on several data points. He has a non-falsifiable approach that I don't, that's why "I can't prove it to him" = he won't let the facts or me persuade him. In this manner, I stick to scientific principles. He will not allow for it to be proven to him, because he can't set criteria that will sate him. I'm not that way. Are you?

Deceive, Deny, Discourage, Divide, Dissent, Dominate, Decapitate and Destroy.
Why.
Because.

Progressivism and relativism serve as the means of achieving the goal of a citizenry with a statist orientation.
I myself had all sorts of fun in college with moral nihilism being distinct from moral relativism, which does allow a moral statements to be true or false in a non-objective sense, but does not assign any static truth to values of a moral statements, and of course moral universalism, which holds moral statements to be objectively true or false. Insofar as only true statements can be known, moral nihilism implies moral skepticism.

Cool Breeze wrote: Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:17 am Here's your problem, and why you can't think straight about this topic: everything is a bubble to you. You can't even differentiate value from a bubble, because your whimsical approach doesn't define what either is. Sorry, you don't get to just declare something is a bubble without any reasoning. Tell me something that ISN'T a bubble (for example, something that is increasing in price, just to make it a comparison) and why?

I hope everyone notices the response to this, will yet again, be a nothing answer.

The trick isn't in differentiating value from a bubble. It's not an either/or proposition. We're in an all one market bubble where, as I've said, there are ~5,000 bubble items to differentiate. The trick is to differentiate relative value within the all one market bubble. At any given time, there will be a few items out of those ~5,000 that represent the best relative value. I look at my job as to find those and flip them as their price goes up and other items displace them as having better relative value.