John wrote:** 02-Mar-2020 World View: WHO: This virus is not influenza
I'm getting really annoyed by seeing smooth-talking males and sweetly
smiling sexy girls explaining to the TV audience that there is nothing
to worry about because hundreds of thousands of people get the
ordinary seasonal flu each other, and 50,000 or so die each year.
Therefore, they conclude, coronavirus is no different than ordinary
flu.
That's obviously an open-mouth lie.
Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus gave a press briefing
- If Coronavirus were just like the ordinary flu, then why has
China quarantined tens of millions of people? And why is China's
economy near collapse, with millions of businesses shut down?- If Coronavirus were just like the ordinary flu, then why did the
Japanese quarantine the Diamond Princess cruise ship for weeks, and
why is Japan considering canceling the Tokyo Olympics?- If Coronavirus were just like the orginary flu, then why is every
country in the world setting up travel restrictions, forbidding large
gatherings of people, and quarantining many people, even those who
haven't yet shown symptoms?
today:
So if you ignore the pretty smiles and soothing, reassuring words,"The epidemics in the Republic of Korea, Italy, Iran
and Japan are our greatest concern. This is a unique virus, with
unique features. This virus is not influenza. We are in uncharted
territory."
then that's where we really are.
---- Source:
-- WHO says new coronavirus cases outside China are 9 times higher
than inside over last 24 hours
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/02/who-say ... hours.html
(CNBC, 2-Mar-2020)
...
- Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO’s health emergencies program, said Monday scientists still don’t know exactly how COVID-19 “behaves,” saying it’s not like influenza. “We know it’s not transmitting in exactly the same way that influenza was, and that offers us a glimmer, a chink of light, that this virus can be suppressed and pushed and contained,” he said.
Anyway,.. any communicable disease that has proven to kill people, and isn't fully understood, has to be considered dangerous, BUT that doesn't mean it HAS to be "massively deadly" per se.
Only time will tell, and it's best we don't get too far out over our skis.
I do find the "face mask recommendations" thing to be rather interesting, though.
The virus is embedded in little "sneezed out mucus droplets". That means that you don't have to filter out particles that are "virus sized" but rather "mucus droplet sized", which would make P100 (and possible N95) rated masks very effective in filtering out the disease, assuming you use it correctly.
INCORRECT: The virus would simply die on the fibers of the mask's filter after an hour or so.
Covid-19 can live on surfaces 4 to 9 days. Therefore, treating "breathed through" filters with 62-71% ethanol, 0.5% hydrogen peroxide or 0.1% sodium hypochlorite (bleach) can "efficiently" inactivate coronaviruses within a minute.
The probable reason for downplaying the effectiveness of the masks is the likely run on the mask supply otherwise.
Those "bright enough" to realize which "particles" need filtering will continue to have a supply on hand.
( I got the silicone half-faced 3M mask with the pink 3M P100 round replaceable filters. )
EDIT: Revision - Covid-19 can live on surfaces 4 to 9 days. Therefore, treating "breathed through" filters with 62-71% ethanol, 0.5% hydrogen peroxide or 0.1% sodium hypochlorite (bleach) can "efficiently" inactivate coronaviruses within a minute.