John wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 11:56 am
Monday, January 16th, 2023.
it's worthwhile taking a pause at this point. to see where things stand.
there is apparently plenty of anecdotal evidence , presented by Tim and others, that increases in deaths from heart attacks are correlated to the use of vaccines. as I understand it, the heart problems are related to the spike protein that occurs in both of virus and the vaccine. whether correlation will turn into causation remains to be seen.
however, there is absolutely no evidence that I'm aware of that. the vaccine or it's components are a bio weapon developed by the Chinese Communists. two reasons that argue against such a conclusion are, first, I do not believe that the Chinese are capable of producing such a bio weapon without stealing the technology from the United States, and second, vaccines have been available now for 2 years, and although there are fatal side effects, there is no evidence that the side effects are the intentional development by the Chinese Communist.
in other words, there's a long long distance between side effects and bio weapon , and there's no evidence of the latter.
The idea of the injection being a bio weapon is speculation. There is no clear evidence or proof. The theory of the injection being a CCP bioweapon first originated with Jeff Nyquist and Naomi Wolf as far as I'm aware.
There are some things that don't seem right:
Chinese involvement with SARS-COV2 and the mRNA injections
China and the PLA overseeing some of the clinical trials of mRNA injections
China and Russia not using mRNA
China releasing footage of people collapsing in the streets - this could have been part of the fear campaign to drive people to getting the injection
China closing domestic flights but leaving international flights open during a pandemic
The mRNA injection being the bio weapon would fit perfectly well into Chi Haotian's speech
mRNA injections were pushed onto the countries that will be enemies of China in WWIII
The mechanism by which the mRNA injections damage or kill people doesn't seem to be well understood
With China and most of the major countries being in a Crisis Era we have to be open to the idea of pearl harbor style sneak attack that we are completely unsuspecting. Are the mRNA injections the sneak attack?
Do you really see China nuking the west coast of the U.S. while invading Taiwan as the first attack of WWIII?
I quote this again, from a 1964 book Tomorrow's Weapons:
The former Commanding General of the U.S. Army Chemical Corps Research and Development Command, Brigadier General J.H. Rothschild, wrote a book published in 1964 titled Tomorrow’s Weapons. The book described what Rothschild called “toxic weapons,” used in chemical and biological warfare. His most farsighted chapter was on “Special operations with toxic weapons.” Rothschild explained that toxic weapons were “very powerful … particularly when used against an open society, such as ours, in times of supposed peace.”[10] Touching on the use of toxic weapons in sabotage operations, General Rothschild noted that toxic weapons could be used “over a period of time to break down the confidence of … people in their country….”[11]
More specifically, Rothschild warned that sabotage committed by way of toxic agents – biological and chemical – could be used to “destroy our confidence in the ability of our government to insure the protection of our food, medicines, and the like.” Rothschild noted that even during the Cold War, “little control is exercised over the movements or actions of our people” and this “simplifies the saboteur’s job. If the enemy’s use of sabotage forces us to institute restrictive measures on our freedom to move about, that in itself is a victory for the enemy.”[12] Rothschild’s warnings have been vindicated, especially since the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak erupted out of China in January 2020. Today, with advances in biological technology, a sabotage attack is likely to rely on unfamiliar organisms with unfamiliar effects on the human body. With respect to countermeasures, Rothschild even offered a noteworthy remark about vaccines when he wrote, “Dependence upon artificial immunization as a protective measure [against a weapon] must be carefully evaluated because the efficacy of most artificial immunity is relative.”[13]
Rothschild explained that our “food, drug, and cosmetic industries are all likely sabotage victims. The production processes of all are vulnerable to the introduction of chemical and biological agents, and the resultant contaminated products could be widely distributed.”[14] Rothschild further explained that the contamination of widely used food additives could have a devastating effect, especially because safeguards have never been put into place. Rothschild suggested that the mass contamination of medicines and vaccines was not likely to occur under normal Cold War conditions. “Rather,” noted Rothschild, “this [contamination] would be used to break down public confidence immediately preceding the outbreak of hostilities, or otherwise tied into an overall design. A sustained campaign of sabotage … irregularly dispersed with regard to time and area of occurrence, can produce a constant buildup of public fear and a complete loss of confidence in authority. If such a campaign were conducted in peace time with no particular climax in view, effects would be inconclusive and it would give time to establish a defense.”[15] In other words, biological sabotage is best used prior to the outbreak of a major war.