Re: Financial topics
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:08 am
I have had another look at BTC pricing history; maybe it was a bit harsh saying that BTC pricing was bubble mania, albeit that I acknowledge that blockchain has societal benefits, but no one seems clear about the value or to whom it will accrue.
Now two questions:
Is BTC tradeable?
Is BTC investible?
If I look at the price charts of January 1 2022 to current day, I really don't have the skill to short term trade BTC. I am a successful stock market trader but BTC is beyond my trading competence. Every trade would simply be a bet of unknown odds; maybe you win today but not tomorrow
Then as an investment? It went from over $ 50 000 in January 2022 through to $ 17 663 last Saturday with massive volatility. And with no underlying changes like prospects of increased future profitability. And its very different to gold where we can track a correlation between inflation and the gold price over the long term, and gold has a 5000 year history as a store of value. If BTC was a stock market share would it be the darling of the market? Or the pariah? Or something in between? Then there's a moral issue - BTC is favoured by terrorists and criminals because ownership and transactions can be hidden. So its not a building block of a solid happy society.
Bubble mania as the underlying driver of the price? Yes, I believe so.
And finally there's nothing unusual about bubble mania. We can track it back hundreds of years. For example, tulips also had an underlying value, as does block chain, but the tulip prices became bubble mania
Now two questions:
Is BTC tradeable?
Is BTC investible?
If I look at the price charts of January 1 2022 to current day, I really don't have the skill to short term trade BTC. I am a successful stock market trader but BTC is beyond my trading competence. Every trade would simply be a bet of unknown odds; maybe you win today but not tomorrow
Then as an investment? It went from over $ 50 000 in January 2022 through to $ 17 663 last Saturday with massive volatility. And with no underlying changes like prospects of increased future profitability. And its very different to gold where we can track a correlation between inflation and the gold price over the long term, and gold has a 5000 year history as a store of value. If BTC was a stock market share would it be the darling of the market? Or the pariah? Or something in between? Then there's a moral issue - BTC is favoured by terrorists and criminals because ownership and transactions can be hidden. So its not a building block of a solid happy society.
Bubble mania as the underlying driver of the price? Yes, I believe so.
And finally there's nothing unusual about bubble mania. We can track it back hundreds of years. For example, tulips also had an underlying value, as does block chain, but the tulip prices became bubble mania