Re: Financial topics
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:26 pm
Vince, as they say back where I was born, that dog won't hunt.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127616/infla ... te-us.aspx
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127616/infla ... te-us.aspx
Generational theory, international history and current events
https://www.gdxforum.com/forum/
People usually understand enough about hyperinflation to realize that the flood of money is due to the central bank, so Bernanke will be blamed. If he suddenly disappears then he has realized what is going to happen.John wrote:I used to think that history would blame Greenspan or Bernanke for the
coming financial crisis. But now I think that it's going to be blamed
on Europe.
While it is true people are concerned about inflation, that is not the same thing as expecting hyperinflation.OLD1953 wrote:Vince, as they say back where I was born, that dog won't hunt.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127616/infla ... te-us.aspx
If the consensus is that there will be a QE3 of a certain type and dollar amount within a certain time frame and that expectation is reflected in the gold price, then the gold price will fall if the expected QE3 doesn't materialize. The same will happen with hyperinflation expectations.vincecate wrote:When they are expressed pervasively the 30 bond interest rate will NOT be below 4%. There are those of us who think hyperinflation is coming but we are still clearly in the minority.Higgenbotham wrote: Two that I've heard from people on the street this year:
There will be a QE3, a QE4, a QE5, a QE6 and on and on to infinity.
There's going to be hyperinflation like Weimar Germany.
I don't see these sentiments being expressed as pervasively as they were at the top of the Nasdaq and real estate bubbles but I'm not sure that's necessary because gold is a much smaller part of the economy than tech or real estate.
Are you claiming there will not be a QE3? Seems like foreigners have stopped buying Treasuries. The taxes only cover about half of the Federal government expenses. If the Fed does not buy Treasuries, who else will be doing so in the volume needed? What kind of person thinks that 4% for 30 years is a good deal on US dollars that they are printing like crazy?
http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center ... ts/mfh.txt
The other advantage for the Chinese companies: "they have a wolf pack strategy in which three or four of their companies -- all state-owned -- bid at the auction," says Luft of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security. "When you have a few companies all working under the same umbrella, bidding simultaneously, that gives a huge advantage. I wouldn't be surprised if the bids are coordinated."Higgenbotham wrote:Potential US Treasury Purchases Total Assets/Assets in US Treasuries (Trillions)
One reason for the low allocation to US Treasuries in these accounts is that everyone is still chasing yield in order to meet projected payouts/needs. It's a question of return on capital versus return of capital with allocations shifted in favor of hope that returns will be high enough (around 8%) to sustain the payouts/needs.
Forcing the yield down creates latent demand. Rope-a-dope strategy siphons money from West to East.aedens wrote:As we conveyed wolf pack market.
October 7th will mark the 10 year anniversary of America's longest war.Higgenbotham wrote:Forcing the yield down creates latent demand. Rope-a-dope strategy siphons money from West to East.aedens wrote:As we conveyed wolf pack market.