Higgenbotham wrote:
> John, if you carry your idea bit further, Vince may end up having
> the last laugh. It the can kicking is continued to infinity, then
> in theory every bond market will be supporting every other bond
> market. So the final event will be a worldwide bond market
> collapse of every bond market in the world, all at once. But I
> don't think that is going to happen because eventually the US is
> going to figure out they can't do that without those adverse
> consequences. And once that day comes, that is when the panic is
> going to hit, I believe.
You know, that's an interesting concept. Suppose that everyone agreed
they would keep on lending money to each other, to prop up each
other's economy. Could that really go on forever? Only in a universe
where pigs fly. Sooner or later someone would balk. That's why every
Ponzi scheme crashes, sooner or later. Would that cause
hyperinflation? Not necessarily, because of the plummeting velocity
of money.
At any rate, the concept of unlimited lending is a non-starter.
Europe's EFSF/ESM bailout fund idea is collapsing, because no one want
wants to lend money to the bailout fund, for fear of defaults. And
with S&P threatening to downgrade France and Germany, the EFSF/ESM
bonds would have to have sky high yields, just like Greek and Italian
bonds.
(Incidentally, Italian 10-year bombs popped up to 7.1% today, before
settling a hair below 7%, so the LTRO gimmick is failing.)
There was an interesting little battle launched a few days ago. An EU
court ruled that non-European airlines have to pay a "carbon tax" for
the entire flight for any flight that passes over Europe. So a flight
from Los Angeles to Frankfurt has to pay a carbon tax for the entire
flight. This tax is supposed to go into effect on January 1. Some
congessmen are furious, and China is threatening a trade war, and
threatening to cancel a large order of Airbuses. We may yet have a
major trade war on our hands, and that would end any pretense of
cooperation.
John