Financial topics

Investments, gold, currencies, surviving after a financial meltdown
Trevor
Posts: 1253
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:43 am

Re: Financial topics

Post by Trevor »

We could end up seeing that again if panics begins to set.
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Financial topics

Post by John »

Higgenbotham wrote:
John wrote:There's a typo in my article. It should be -0.105%.

John
That's not enough to say I've been right, then. We'll have to see what happens when the next stage of panic gets rolling. It could be that strong short term corporates, if they're the only thing left that's triple A, will be the issues that go the most negative.
I can understand German bond yields going negative, but do you really
believe that investors have enough faith in any corporation to be
enough of a safe haven to warrant negative interest rates?

John
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7987
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

Trevor wrote:We could end up seeing that again if panics begins to set.
It would seem the faster the panic goes, and the more sovereign and corporate credit ratings that are compromised before the panic hits, the more likely that we see highly negative rates on the good short term paper that is left. We have to remember too that many corporations are dependent on the sovereigns, as Marc stated earlier, so many of these entities are tied at the hip, so to speak.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
Trevor
Posts: 1253
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:43 am

Re: Financial topics

Post by Trevor »

and very few corporations still have AAA ratings; i think only 4 in the United States do. At the moment, I wonder which European country will be downgraded next. Based on the track record, it won't be more than a couple weeks.
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7987
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

John wrote:
Higgenbotham wrote:
John wrote:There's a typo in my article. It should be -0.105%.

John
That's not enough to say I've been right, then. We'll have to see what happens when the next stage of panic gets rolling. It could be that strong short term corporates, if they're the only thing left that's triple A, will be the issues that go the most negative.
I can understand German bond yields going negative, but do you really
believe that investors have enough faith in any corporation to be
enough of a safe haven to warrant negative interest rates?

John
Yes, it's a matter of what's the least worst alternative and any corporation that is still triple A probably qualifies, and any corporation that is relatively less indebted and has a better balance sheet than the US government may also be a better risk. I haven't examined that possibility in detail yet, but it is foremost in my mind to be looking at that if the US goverment can't get its act together.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7987
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

Trevor wrote:and very few corporations still have AAA ratings;i think only 4 in the United States do.
Correct, which makes triple A short term paper extremely rare. Seems like McDonalds and Micrsoft might be 2 of the 4, but last I read there are 4.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
Trevor
Posts: 1253
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:43 am

Re: Financial topics

Post by Trevor »

which is why investors are still buying our bonds. Even if we're not doing well, we look stable compared to what's going on in the eurozone.
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Financial topics

Post by John »

Higgenbotham wrote:
Trevor wrote:and very few corporations still have AAA ratings;i think only 4 in the United States do.
Correct, which makes triple A short term paper extremely rare. Seems like McDonalds and Micrsoft might be 2 of the 4, but last I read there are 4.

Negative yields on McDonalds bonds, but not on U.S. bonds. It boggles the mind.

John
Marc
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:49 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Marc »

Exclusive: Borrowers turn lenders as banks tap firms for cash

By Douwe Miedema | Reuters – Mon, Jan 9, 2012

(Source: http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-borrowe ... 53643.html)

LONDON (Reuters) - Blue-chip names like Johnson & Johnson , Pfizer and Peugeot are among firms bailing out Europe's ailing banks in a reversal of the established roles of clients and lenders.

One source with knowledge of the so-called repo deals or short-term secured lending, said the two U.S. pharmaceutical groups and French carmaker were the latest to sign up for them.

Europe's banks are struggling to secure the cash to fund their day-to-day business and have largely stopped lending to each other for fear Europe's sovereign debt crisis could land any of their peers in trouble.

As a result a group of well-known, cash-rich companies with solid cash flows has stepped in the repo market, which provides a form of lending so far almost exclusively in use between banks, and between banks and central banks.

One market participant said in one key area of lending companies now accounted for 25 percent of these deals.

Repos provide the new financiers with the strict guarantees they need before parting with their cash, answering worries that the crisis has weakened Europe's banks to the extent that they might not be able to pay the money back.

"Companies in the past were ... happy to deposit cash on an unsecured basis to a bank for an interest payment," said Frank Reiss, who oversees some of the repo business at Euroclear, the Brussels-based settlement house owned by a group of banks.

"Now following the crisis, we have seen that companies are engaging in repos secured with collateral against the cash they are lending," said Reiss. Euroclear is the largest administrator of repo trades in Europe.

At the moment the European Central Bank provides the main lifeline for banks and has pumped hundreds of billions of euros of cash into the market.

But the banks are parking most of the money they borrow back at the ECB rather than trusting to lend to each other.

They are also paying insurers and pension funds to take their illiquid bonds in exchange for better quality ones, in a desperate bid to secure much-needed cash from the ECB, which only provides cash against collateral.

In stark contrast, Europe's biggest companies are sitting on cashpiles that amount to more than $20 billion each in the case of BP Plc and Volkswagen.

According to Moody's, a sample of European companies held $872 billion cash in total at the middle of 2011.

It is typically these very large companies, with reliable cash flows, that engage in repo deals with banks, Euroclear's Reiss said, though he declined to give the names of any counterparties, because of client confidentiality.

Corporate treasurers are typically extremely wary of talking about their day-to-day cash management, and Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer declined to discuss the matter. Peugeot was not available for comment, while other large companies contacted by Reuters also declined comment.

FAST RISE

Regulators cracking down on "shadow banking" -- closed-door deals blamed in part for the 2008 financial crisis -- have expressed worries about how opaque the repo market is, and the U.S. Federal Reserve has set up a working group to suggest reforms.

The rise in repos means more business for companies such as Euroclear and its main rival Clearstream -- owned by Deutsche Boerse -- as well as Bank of New York Mellon , JP Morgan and State Street.

In a repo trade, one party buys collateral from the other, with the obligation to sell it back at a pre-defined later date and for a slightly lower price -- the so-called haircut. That way, the seller provides cash to the buyer.

When companies rather than banks engage in repo deals they typically rely on a third party for administering the collateral, in what are known as triparty repos.

The triparty market grew at 22.3 percent in the first half of last year, a survey by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) showed, versus only a modest rise in the overall business, further prove that companies are increasingly accessing the market.

"It shows you that triparty is growing, but ... not the banks themselves," said Richard Comotto, an academic who is involved in drawing up the survey. "I would say triparty is very growing strongly among corporate treasurers."

The European repo market was worth 6.2 trillion euros ($7.88 trillion) in the first half of 2011, according to ICMA's September survey. The vast majority of business conducted was between banks,and banks and central banks.

Other than the ICMA survey, few numbers are available.

Based on his daily practice, Euroclear's Reiss estimated that up to 25 percent of the triparty market was on behalf of companies, a massive and sudden rise from the 2 to 5 percent where it had traditionally been.


($1 = 0.7865 euros)

(Reporting by Douwe Miedema)
aedens
Posts: 5211
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:13 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by aedens »

Higgenbotham wrote:http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/ ... MQ20120110

Probably news like this can trigger an initial slide from the stock market high (not saying this is necessarily it but similar can get the ball rolling), then as the slide starts to gain traction and momentum, the equivalent "Ohio Life" or "Lehman" event this time around will be sovereign related. That would likely be some months from now, if history is an appropriate guide.
It is Higg,
The Fabian strategy.
Last edited by aedens on Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests