Re: Financial topics
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2012 4:16 am
Interesting video, trucking is weak, rail shows sluggish growth. Gasoline is more oriented to personal transport, but it just keeps dropping. Airlines keep on contracting, at least on the short haul flights. I've got to wonder if some of this isn't due to a search for lower price or greater efficiency in deliveries. I remember when I was working at the mines, when coal prices were up, a few cents cost per ton did not get anyone excited, if prices were down, saving a penny a ton in costs made you a hero. With no room for price increases, we may be seeing the result of a hunt for the cheapest mode of transport.
I read this and thought that it may become the final straw that breaks the backs of commodity speculators.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... %3Darticle
Piling into the market are farmers and food companies burned by the collapse in milk prices in 2009. They are looking to protect themselves after a recent drop in prices, following a surge last year. Their increasing numbers make it easier to buy and sell futures contracts, known as liquidity, typically a problem in smaller markets. And that is starting to arouse the interest of speculative investors.
***************************
Everyone here knows the defense of speculation, that it increases liquidity. And we also know that defense only holds true when there are few speculators in relation to actual consumers of product - and by few speculators we mean few in terms of money/contracts in relation to consumer/delivery contracts. Milk for delivery is not a huge market in terms of dollars, and it could easily be dragged to unreal prices by the actions of a few. People have been trained to expect this with gas prices (it would drive any sane person crazy to try to explain high gas prices in the face of falling demand and a glut of product using classic economics without invoking some kind of intervention) but I do not believe even the sheep like American consumer will tolerate this type of excessive speculation in regards to milk prices. This could easily become something to make OWS and the Tea Party combined look like kids in a blow up pool compared to an ocean.
I was wondering what spooked those investors. Given that Apple appears to be carrying the market all by it's lonesome, it was likely word of this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/techn ... to-25.html
Foxconn said that salaries for many workers would immediately jump by 16 to 25 percent, to about $400 a month, before overtime.
The company also said it would reduce overtime hours at its factories.
Labor rights groups say that over the years, many Foxconn plants have violated Chinese labor laws by pushing workers to endure excessive amounts of overtime.
*************************
If Apple no longer gets the old "look the other way and it didn't happen" bonus, their profits will drop and they won't be the superstars any longer.
I read this and thought that it may become the final straw that breaks the backs of commodity speculators.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... %3Darticle
Piling into the market are farmers and food companies burned by the collapse in milk prices in 2009. They are looking to protect themselves after a recent drop in prices, following a surge last year. Their increasing numbers make it easier to buy and sell futures contracts, known as liquidity, typically a problem in smaller markets. And that is starting to arouse the interest of speculative investors.
***************************
Everyone here knows the defense of speculation, that it increases liquidity. And we also know that defense only holds true when there are few speculators in relation to actual consumers of product - and by few speculators we mean few in terms of money/contracts in relation to consumer/delivery contracts. Milk for delivery is not a huge market in terms of dollars, and it could easily be dragged to unreal prices by the actions of a few. People have been trained to expect this with gas prices (it would drive any sane person crazy to try to explain high gas prices in the face of falling demand and a glut of product using classic economics without invoking some kind of intervention) but I do not believe even the sheep like American consumer will tolerate this type of excessive speculation in regards to milk prices. This could easily become something to make OWS and the Tea Party combined look like kids in a blow up pool compared to an ocean.
I was wondering what spooked those investors. Given that Apple appears to be carrying the market all by it's lonesome, it was likely word of this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/techn ... to-25.html
Foxconn said that salaries for many workers would immediately jump by 16 to 25 percent, to about $400 a month, before overtime.
The company also said it would reduce overtime hours at its factories.
Labor rights groups say that over the years, many Foxconn plants have violated Chinese labor laws by pushing workers to endure excessive amounts of overtime.
*************************
If Apple no longer gets the old "look the other way and it didn't happen" bonus, their profits will drop and they won't be the superstars any longer.