** 05-Mar-2021 World View: The Conundrum of 2021 Economic Growth
There is a narrative among economists that conflicts a little with
what I would expect from Generational Dynamics theory, and so it will
be worth watching carefully to see how this tension between narrative
and theory plays out during the rest of 2021.
All the highly respected economic gurus that I seen on tv these days
seem to agree to the following narrative:
- The beneficial effects of vaccines are much greater than
anyone believed possible a year ago, or even a couple of months ago,
because of operation warp speed.
- A large number of people have either been vaccinated or they've
already had Covid, and so a lot people (the Neanderthals) are opening
up businesses again and returning to work.
- As the weather warms in the spring, this trend will accelerate,
and more people will be outside. (However, this trend could reverse
in the summer if people gather indoors to enjoy air conditioning.)
(This trend also won't apply to South Africa, South America or
Australia, where it will be winter.)
- There was supposed to be a long, dark winter, but this morning's
jobs report shows that the economy is booming. This is especially
true of the leisure and hospitality sectors.
- After the Democrats' $1.9 trillion massive stimulus bill is
passed, and $1,400 stimulus checks go out to everyone, then people
will have a lot more money to spend, especially if they're going back
to work.
- There is an enormous pent-up demand from consumers who have been
unable to travel or go shopping, for a year.
- Therefore, there will be an explosion in retail sales, in travel
and hospitality, and in other sectors.
- Therefore, there will be an explosion in economic growth in the
last half of 2021.
- Therefore, there will be a rapid spike in inflation by the end of
this year.
- In fact, I heard one "expert" go on a long rant this morning,
saying that he has only one fear, inflation: "My greatest fear is that
Jerome Powell is wrong about inflation, and that it will rear its ugly
head, and once it starts to take off it will be like a momentum trade
and keep growing faster and faster, and the Fed will be forced to
raise interest rates as much as, God forbid, one percent, and that
will hurt stock prices."
So that's the mainstream narrative among the "experts." As I've
written many times, the "experts" have been consistently wrong since
2003, when I started keeping track. For the last 70 quarters, the
"experts" predicted that there would be inflation or super-inflation
in the following quarter, and for 70 quarters they've been wrong every
quarter. And now it's the same thing all over again.
It would be VERY nice if even one of these "experts" at least
acknowledged that they've been wrong for the last 70 quarters, and
explained why "this time it's different" this quarter. But they never
do.
I heard one person say, "I've always known when the economy is flooded
with money, then inflation will go up. That's what's going to happen
now." That's the knee-jerk view, but it's obviously not true. Since
2007, the economy has continually been flooded with money, but
inflation has not gone up. The person who said this is an idiot.
You know, I used to think that the amount of money in the economy at
least had some effect on the inflation rate, but as time has gone on,
I increasingly believe that the amount of money has absolutely nothing
to do with the inflation rate, at least in the American economy.
The inflation rate is not a monetary phenomenon. It's a generational
phenomenon. It's not the Fed that affects the inflation rate. It's
the people, the people's mood, that affect the inflation rate.
Since 2007 I've been talking about the velocity of money, which has
been plummeting, indicating no inflation, despite all the
money-printing. A falling velocity of money means that people aren't
spending money, so there's no inflation.
But let's try to explain this directly, without resorting to the
velocity of money.
Last year, the savings rate was the highest in history. That means
that people were not spending money. The "experts" are saying that
was caused by the pandemic, and this spring it will all reverse, and
people will start spending money explosively because of pent-up
demand.
In my opinion, any belief like that is crazy. Families that have
become accustomed to saving money for a rainy day are not suddenly
going to become profligate. Anyway, the savings rate has been growing
before the pandemic.
Furthermore, most of the stimulus checks are going to go towards
paying off debts -- credit card bills, loans, unpaid rent, and so
forth. Paying off debt is the same as saving, so for that reason
alone the savings rate will not significantly decrease.
In this generational Crisis era, the public mood is far different than
it was in the 1990s Unraveling era or the 1970s Awakening era. In
those days, the public mood was to expect full employment and
increasing salaries. The savings rate was low, especially for young
people, because there was no reason to save.
Today, millions of people went bankrupt or lost their homes duing the
2008 financial crisis, and they are still in shock from that
experience. And of course almost everyone is still in shock from the
pandemic lockdowns. To even suggest that there's going to be an
explosion in spending by young families who are in shock from the
pandemic and the 2008 financial crisis is ridiculous. They know
something that people didn't really know in the 1990s -- that
something new and catastrophic could happen again at any time, and
they'd better be financially prepared. That's why the public mood is
different during a generational Crisis era.
The assumption of an explosion in consumer spending is the lynchpin of
the conclusion of the narrative that there will be inflation or
superinflation by the end of the year.
That's the conundrum. It's going to be very interesting to watch for
the rest of the year to see which turns out to be right: The
mainstream narrative or Generational Dynamics theory. Of course I'll
be betting on the latter, since it's always been right in the past.