Hume built on the framwork of the seen and unseen as did Kopernicus and no he was not allowed to print "timely" as was Hume who was almost executed for an opinion and denied tenure.aedens wrote:I agree Old in a very large regard but TBTF appears TBTS " to big to survive". Many will regard the struggle of the individual against the central planners as mechanisms we have covered for our regard to GD to underpinnings of construct.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/lacy-hunt ... d-policies
I alluded to Hume on a few facets and many others as all do to not assert a ideological view but of course as Hume observed and countless others it will not matter. Hume conveyed the problem of induction, and the distinction between fact and value.
"I guess I'm getting old, because this nonsense has passed from amusing to irritating." Nope, denied since you see the world and the actors IMO
Of Morals, appeared in 1740, as well as an anonymous Abstract.
Although other candidates, especially Adam Smith, have occasionally been proposed as the Abstract's author, scholars now agree that it is Hume's work. The Abstract features a clear, succinct account of “one simple argument” concerning causation and the formation of belief. Hume's elegant summary presages his “recasting” of that argument in the first Enquiry. Hume never held an academic post.
In 1526 Kopernicus wrote a study on the value of money, Monetae cudendae ratio. In it he formulated an early iteration of the theory, now called "Gresham's Law," that "bad" (debased) coinage drives "good" (un-debased) coinage out of circulation, 70 years before Gresham. He also formulated a version of quantity theory of money. His work was suppresed as was Sismondi and a few others we have noted. I can reference many works on so called Keynesian economics based back to 980. Walker (1912) cites the political reality in this context even up to Luther's comments on repressionary design of state affairs. I do not like the term Keynesian economics for reference to the nature of economics reality of social interaction in the proper management of scarce resources.
The sad state of affairs can be traced back to the treaty of Verdun and build the thought map from there on political economy. I found it a fulcrum point to look back and forward from that view in my preference alone. I, as many will follow the scope of thought and our age is dimming for the common man some say. No we will have to wait for the people to awake. What will be left as another conveyed to me. Another conversation was summised as now the lesson was seen as the hand of age pressing on the misconceptions I carried for others. It was good to build a view with another to the placing of importances of allocations and at least move them to the center from the grip of those who abandoned Her. I guess the view retained was pressed out since considerations of that party entertained and revolved in taking capital and not utilizing it for others. One day they just seen to find out the hard way what the left always decides at the allocation dinner table. In time I will ask why you sought harm to the plain people and tell them what you see.
Thanks again! —Best regards, Marc