Cool Breeze wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:23 pm
That's what I'm talking about, you guests don't name yourself and troll as much as anyone on here. Thomas and I have been here for years...
Username:thomasglee
Joined:Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:07 pm
Want to explain why you equate yourself to Thomas when he has been here for 12 years and you have been here for a tiny fraction of that? What would "been here for years" mean to a reasonable person discovering this forum has been in existence since 2008?
John wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:30 pm** 05-Apr-2022 World View: Curious
Cool Breeze wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:58 pm
> It is curious, but it does make sense. I do like the Kamala idiot
> reference though. How've you been, John?
Oh, I'm about the same. You disappeared for a few days, and I thought
you had gone for good. I figured you must be trolling some other
forums, or else Putin recalled you to Moscow. But here you are.
Lucky me.
You know me, picture me trollin'
Somebody's gotta keep the people honest here.
Picture you trollin'? When I can go to other forums like White Coats Investors to see you trollin'? There's no need to picture it.
Cool Breeze wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:23 pm
That's what I'm talking about, you guests don't name yourself and troll as much as anyone on here. Thomas and I have been here for years...
Username:thomasglee
Joined:Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:07 pm
Want to explain why you equate yourself to Thomas when he has been here for 12 years and you have been here for a tiny fraction of that? What would "been here for years" mean to a reasonable person discovering this forum has been in existence since 2008?
You do have problems with the english language, don't you
Cool Breeze wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:23 pm
That's what I'm talking about, you guests don't name yourself and troll as much as anyone on here. Thomas and I have been here for years...
Username:thomasglee
Joined:Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:07 pm
Want to explain why you equate yourself to Thomas when he has been here for 12 years and you have been here for a tiny fraction of that? What would "been here for years" mean to a reasonable person discovering this forum has been in existence since 2008?
You do have problems with the english language, don't you
Impressive, you took a break from pumping Bitcoin and Putin to respond...I wasn't aware that less than two is plural...thanks for enlightening me, retard.
Guest wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:45 pm
> Impressive, you took a break from pumping Bitcoin and Putin to
> respond...I wasn't aware that less than two is plural...thanks for
> enlightening me, retard.
Well, I hate to have to defend Cool Breeze, but less than two
sometimes IS plural.
John wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:58 pm** 11-Apr-2022 World View: Cookies
Guest wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:45 pm
> Impressive, you took a break from pumping Bitcoin and Putin to
> respond...I wasn't aware that less than two is plural...thanks for
> enlightening me, retard.
Well, I hate to have to defend Cool Breeze, but less than two
sometimes IS plural.
One cookie
Two cookies
One and one-half cookies
Cool Breeze's response was like Clinton talking about what is the meaning of is. Just as Clinton can debate the meaning of is, Cool Breeze can debate the meaning of years to try to dodge the questions.
“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”
SEPT 13, 1998 9:14 PM
Years from now, when we look back on Bill Clinton’s presidency, its defining moment may well be Clinton’s rationalization to the grand jury about why he wasn’t lying when he said to his top aides that with respect to Monica Lewinsky, “There’s nothing going on between us.” How can this be? Here’s what Clinton told the grand jury (according to footnote 1,128 in Starr’s report):
“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the—if he—if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement. … Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.”
The distinction between “is” and “was” was seized on by the commentariat when Clinton told Jim Lehrer of PBS right after the Lewinsky story broke, “There is no improper relationship.” Chatterbox confesses that at the time he thought all these Beltway domes were hyperanalyzing, and in need of a little fresh air. But it turns out they were right: Bill Clinton really is a guy who’s willing to think carefully about “what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.” This is way beyond slick. Perhaps we should start calling him, “Existential Willie.”
Guest wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:45 pm
> Impressive, you took a break from pumping Bitcoin and Putin to
> respond...I wasn't aware that less than two is plural...thanks for
> enlightening me, retard.
Well, I hate to have to defend Cool Breeze, but less than two
sometimes IS plural.
He can say that when he said Bitcoin was going to 100K, he was talking about what it would go to in Roubles, then ask if I have a problem understanding currency.