Re: Financial topics
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:30 pm
Generational theory, international history and current events
https://www.gdxforum.com/forum/
Go down to Kinkos or some other copy shop, and you can scan them there.Higgenbotham wrote:John, I bought the Penguin Atlas books back in 1994, and don't have a scanner here.John wrote:If the map is being displayed on your screen..Higgenbotham wrote: > I wish I could bring up some of McEvedy's population maps.
John
From McEvedy's maps:John wrote:Go down to Kinkos or some other copy shop, and you can scan them there.
http://www.flowofhistory.com/units/birth/5/FC39Cities overall in the Western Mediterranean went into decline, ceasing to function either as centers of production and consumption or centralized administration (as Roman central government broke down). Wars seriously damaged some cities, such as Milan, Trier, and Arles. Rome especially suffered, with its population declining from an estimated 800,000 in the 300s to 25,000 after the turmoil of the Byzantine re-conquest.
a, with others around the world moving toward proper scaling while the US continues to delude itself with "too big to fail" then, you know, we can more easily go the way of Rome or the Soviet Union. The idiocy posted about in the past few days all ties together. I'm positive Obama's advisors couldn't see it in time or they would have done differently and obviously Wall Street and the masses are not awake yet. But one day they will stir and it can end in the blink of an eye when there is nothing left to lose and people lose it. I read today that 40% of all Americans have less than $500 to their name. The 1% are begging for violence and they are begging for these once great American cities to become depopulated shells like Detroit already has, as you have probably seen first hand yourself.aedens wrote:Size does matter and for clarfication proper scaling matters now more than size in some sectors.
http://www.pbs.org/now/printable/transc ... print.htmlLAPHAM: Sure. I mean, much of it is based on government subsidy. I mean, the subsidy to the corporations far exceeds the subsidy given to welfare mothers. And it also, it's the way our politics works, it favors that.
That is why you have so little differentiation between the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, because they both are going to the same sources of money. And they're both serving the interests of wealth.
MOYERS: I was watching that Wal-Mart piece, I was reminded that at one time Hillary Clinton was on the board of the Wal-Mart corporation, and...if the Democratic Party is not, and the Republican Party is not speaking for the people like that who lost their jobs or lost their pension plans or lost their savings in the recent corporate debacles, who is speaking for them now?
LAPHAM: No organized political force.