Re: Financial topics
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:19 am
Shark week, and yes we remember turning blue mountain here also. The one who bought that nice house on a synethic trade.
One day this "hedge" will come to epitomize the "recovery", for it contains all the elements of everything that is wrong with postponing the inevitable.
If memory serves, at the time JPM had assets of $1.1 trillion and loans of $700 billion. Given that as a Primary Dealer, JPM is a transmission entity for QE, their asset surplus of $400 billion suggests that what QE was ostensibly intended to address (liquidity) wasn't exactly the problem that needed addressing, which further explains why QE hasn't done much beyond stuffing Ferrari's order book and making for a grand party season or three in the Hamptons.
To continue, this $400 asset surplus begged for a "cash management" regimen, which means it became fuel for the prop traders. Call it a hedge or cash management, depending on what entities are chasing them post facto, doesn't take away from the fact that JPM became half or more of a market in an esoteric synthetic derivative, that is, an instrument created for the sole purpose of allowing a semi-public arena for prop desks and hedge funds to battle each other, serving the greater good not at all. Cash management using a synthetic 10-year instrument?
Those looking for a scalp might also want to ask how this incident might encourage responsible authorities (if that is not an oxymoron) to question the efficacy and need for the Fed's QE, and also question if it serves the public good to allow an entity that holds upwards of 9% of all US bank deposits to gamble with its peers in a foreign jurisdiction with said deposits. Ancillary issues, which might have produced great theater, would have been if Congresspeople holding public hearings had popped a surprise question to Jamie Dimon asking him to explain what exactly the CDX IG9 is, and how it was relevant to JPM's asset-over-loan surplus. There would have been no better argument for ending TBTF than to watch a CEO hem and haw, stutter and drool, trying to explain and justify something he doesn't begin to understand, yet expects taxpayer back-up in the event something sometime goes horribly wrong.
A subplot is the redemption of Boaz Weinstein, once a hero, and then a goat at Deustche Bank, who became a hero yet again by taking---along with Blue Mountain and a few others---the other side of the trade that became the London Gang Bang. They were all like mythic (and ultimately useless) Greek or Nordic gods doing celestial battle, and like the gods, we would do well to be done with them one and all. ty c
reviresco » Sun Nov 13, 2011 4:03 pm Just a brief note expressing support for the FDIC not insuring anything other than actual deposits at America's banks.
As we noted low hanging fruit allowed a long time ago. Emptor, its still broken...
Perfume does not save you in the end.
Le secret des grandes fortunes sans cause apparente est un crime oublié, parce qu'il a été proprement fait
Honoré de Balzac, Le Père Goriot (1835)
One day this "hedge" will come to epitomize the "recovery", for it contains all the elements of everything that is wrong with postponing the inevitable.
If memory serves, at the time JPM had assets of $1.1 trillion and loans of $700 billion. Given that as a Primary Dealer, JPM is a transmission entity for QE, their asset surplus of $400 billion suggests that what QE was ostensibly intended to address (liquidity) wasn't exactly the problem that needed addressing, which further explains why QE hasn't done much beyond stuffing Ferrari's order book and making for a grand party season or three in the Hamptons.
To continue, this $400 asset surplus begged for a "cash management" regimen, which means it became fuel for the prop traders. Call it a hedge or cash management, depending on what entities are chasing them post facto, doesn't take away from the fact that JPM became half or more of a market in an esoteric synthetic derivative, that is, an instrument created for the sole purpose of allowing a semi-public arena for prop desks and hedge funds to battle each other, serving the greater good not at all. Cash management using a synthetic 10-year instrument?
Those looking for a scalp might also want to ask how this incident might encourage responsible authorities (if that is not an oxymoron) to question the efficacy and need for the Fed's QE, and also question if it serves the public good to allow an entity that holds upwards of 9% of all US bank deposits to gamble with its peers in a foreign jurisdiction with said deposits. Ancillary issues, which might have produced great theater, would have been if Congresspeople holding public hearings had popped a surprise question to Jamie Dimon asking him to explain what exactly the CDX IG9 is, and how it was relevant to JPM's asset-over-loan surplus. There would have been no better argument for ending TBTF than to watch a CEO hem and haw, stutter and drool, trying to explain and justify something he doesn't begin to understand, yet expects taxpayer back-up in the event something sometime goes horribly wrong.
A subplot is the redemption of Boaz Weinstein, once a hero, and then a goat at Deustche Bank, who became a hero yet again by taking---along with Blue Mountain and a few others---the other side of the trade that became the London Gang Bang. They were all like mythic (and ultimately useless) Greek or Nordic gods doing celestial battle, and like the gods, we would do well to be done with them one and all. ty c
reviresco » Sun Nov 13, 2011 4:03 pm Just a brief note expressing support for the FDIC not insuring anything other than actual deposits at America's banks.
As we noted low hanging fruit allowed a long time ago. Emptor, its still broken...
Perfume does not save you in the end.
Le secret des grandes fortunes sans cause apparente est un crime oublié, parce qu'il a été proprement fait
Honoré de Balzac, Le Père Goriot (1835)