A closer look at the Czech Republic data confirms the mRNA vaccines are too deadly to be used
Several people have replicated my work and agree with me. I'll list here the new attacks and why they all fail to explain the data so you can decide for yourself who to believe.
Executive summary
In an earlier article (which has links to all the Czech Republic articles I’ve written), I showed that gold-standard record-level data (showed the mortality rate ratio (MRR) between Moderna mortality rate and Pfizer’s was often over 30% and disproportionately impacted younger people. What this means is Moderna is too unsafe to be used. And other data shows Pfizer must be unsafe as well.
Since then, others have replicated my work showing both mRNA vaccines are too deadly to be used.
Using Czech data alone, we don’t have 100% proof that all the COVID vaccines were deadly. The findings could possibly be attributed to unknown confounders from an uneven distribution e.g. due to differences in socioeconomic status (SES). One product could be accidentally given to the sick and those more likely to die.
However, a thorough analysis of the Czech data shows why these explanations are very highly unlikely and why they are insufficient to explain the data that was observed. But critically there are many other data sources we can also use to build a full picture and greatly increase the confidence in our hypothesis.
Taking everything into account, there is simply no other remotely plausible explanation to explain what this gold-standard official government data shows. It’s devastating to the narrative for this reason.
Three key points:
None of the attacks provided a credible alternative hypothesis.
None of the attacks could point out anything in the Czech data that would preclude the vaccines from being deadly.
None of the attackers can explain a simple 100% verifiable anecdote like Jay Bonnar’s story. Within 2.5 years post vaccine rollout, Jay lost 15 friends unexpectedly, all vaccinated and 4 died on the same day as their vaccines (and 3 of the 4 were 30 years old or younger). He lost just one friend from COVID. This anecdote is statistically impossible if the Pfizer vaccine is safe (probability of around 5.63e-22). Nobody has ever explained how this story could have happened if the COVID vaccines are safe.
In this article I will:
List people who independently confirmed what I found
List the new attack vectors and explain in detail why each attack fails
Explain the techniques that people use to deal with the cognitive dissonance when they are confronted with data showing they are wrong.
This is a long article, but it’s important to address all the criticisms head on.
There is no viable alternative explanation
All of the attacks that have surfaced to date provide no plausible explanation for the observed data. They are all designed to create FUD. None provide an alternative explanation for the Czech data that is consistent with “safe and effective.” That should be very troubling for anyone supporting the narrative.
The data is too consistent and there was no brand specific systematic bias in vaccine distribution in the Czech Republic.
Consider this excerpt from the time-series “brand” spreadsheet which shows no matter what age you are, and what time period you observe after you got your shot, Moderna is consistently more deadly than Pfizer:
Figure 1. Excerpt from the summary tables in the time series brand spreadsheet. This is for doses 1 to 3 combined over variable observation time windows. As you can see the numbers are remarkably consistent.
They claimed that higher rates of comorbidities in the Moderna group could explain the findings.
We examined this as a possible explanation for the observed higher MRR for Moderna, and found that comorbidities are NOT correlated with the MRR so the hypothesis must be rejected.
In fact, I easily (in my first try) found 4 consecutive months where Moderna was getting higher comorbidities, yet the MRR was dropping. If comorbidities was a strong factor explaining the data, the slopes would be aligned, but they were opposite suggesting if there was any effect, it was minor. Also, people with high comorbidities were the first to be vaccinated so we looked at the MRR mid-year and found the same numbers when people with fewer comorbidities were vaccinated.
Also, the attackers never constructed a model of comorbidities that correlates to the MRR. Why didn’t they? Because they can’t because it doesn’t.
So by far, the most plausible hypothesis is that the reason for the MRR being >1 is because the Moderna vaccine killed more people per dose than the Pfizer vaccine. There isn’t any viable other hypothesis left standing that can explain the data.
And if they can’t explain this data, they have the additional problem of no chance of explaining the other data that confirms this data (such as from v-safe, VAERS, Yellow Card system, and the randomized trials).
Additional Support for findings
Quotes from reviewers
Articles validating the results
Other evidence from the Czech Republic that the vaccines are deadly
Denis Rancourt found a similar ratio in VAERS
No evidence of bias in policy
Consistency of MRR
New attack vectors
All of this was because Moderna got people with higher comorbidities
Socioeconomic Factors
It was all COVID
You didn’t look at all the combinations of dose and death
What the reviewers said
“My conclusion is the same as the others. Using Pfizer as a “placebo” (effectively assuming that it is safe), then all other “vaccines” are harmful - deadly in fact. Now, if you believe that Pfizer is, therefore, the only one that is not deadly, unfortunately, you have failed to grasp the implication of this. What it actually means is that they are all deadly, just some are more deadly than others.”
— Joel Smalley, data scientist, excerpt from Analysis of the Important Czech COVID "Vaccine" Mortality Data
“Unless someone can provide compelling evidence of Moderna having been given to those more likely to die in every age group and throughout the vaccination time period, then this is compelling evidence that it was more deadly.”
— Clare Craig, excerpt from Moderna was more deadly than Pfizer
“Given that today it is unknown if the mRNA COVID vaccine products offer any benefits, in conjunction with the fact they are known to cause serious harm and death, while evidence continues to build supporting these products cause additional serious harms that are still unconfirmed. Taking this information together it should be obvious these products should be withdrawn from the market.
The Czech data set you present is clearly concerning and supports prior studies which have suggested Moderna is more harmful than Pfizer, as has been consistently identified in various manners as you refer to in your Substack post.
The Czech data you present is your best work to date, and you should be proud of it.”
— Joseph Fraiman, MD
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Examining Rising Deaths: Who's Really Responsible? | The Way I Heard It
Mike Rowe and Gavin de Becker delve into the realities of excess mortality in America on this episode of The Way I Heard It. They explore critical issues surrounding unexpected deaths and examine the factors contributing to this concerning trend.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Paper showing COVID and flu vaccines do NOT reduce hospitalization was published today
We immediately got four offers from top journals to submit for publication in their journals. Also, the Medicare data confirms the Czech data that vaccine toxicity varies by brand!
Two breakthroughs:
My paper showing the COVID and flu vaccines do not work was published in PrePrints today. The paper shows that the COVID and flu vaccines don’t reduce hospitalization at all. Zero. Zip. Nada. It uses VA data published in JAMA by a top epidemiologist to expose the truth. No hospitalization benefit implies no death benefit because there is no precedent in medicine for no hospitalization benefit yielding a death benefit. So they lied to us about the benefits. It was ALL downside risk with the shots.
I was able to confirm that the Medicare data shows that the mortality rate of the shots depends on brand. Statistically significant. Yet, nobody in the world is looking at this. Not at the local level, not the state level, not the national level. They all look the other way. I guess it’s time for another paper?
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Singapore Officially Releases Annual Birth and Death Report 2023: Post Vax Deaths Continues to Erupt and Stunning Declining Births
Shit continues to hit the fan.
The damning chart appears on page 1 of the Annual Statistics Report, showing that the natural increase decreased from single digits when the pandemic hit and accelerated when the population started taking the vaccination, reaching double digits at 13.0% and a staggering 39.4% after the boosters.
Excess Deaths - Things that make me go hmmmm…
During the peak of excess deaths in Q2 2023, Singapore ranked number one in the world in terms of excess deaths. Subsequently, Singapore was suspiciously removed from the mortality.watch database. Did someone make a phone call?
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Youtube CEO Susan Wojcicki who removed over 1 million videos on COVID-19 Vaccines as a Deep State Operative, has died of Lung Cancer on Aug.9, 2024.
DR. WILLIAM MAKIS MD
Dr. Makis " Susan Wojcicki was a Deep State Operative who was responsible for unprecedented censorship that led to countless unnecessary deaths. It is somewhat unusual to die of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer after only 2 years. If she took COVID-19 Vaccines, this would certainly be suspicious for a Turbo Cancer as Lung Cancers are in the top 5 most common Turbo Cancers. " An old idiom about "petards" comes to mind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoist_with_his_own_petard Maybe someone should add her name to the wikipedia "List of inventors killed by their own invention" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... _invention -
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Malaysian Vital Statistics Demonstrate No Evidence of a Fatal Pandemic in 2020, but Failing Population Health from February 2021 Onwards, which was the Start of Covid-19 Vaccination in Malaysia.
Covid-19 vaccination-linked causality for the excess deaths observed is likely, there being no other logical explanation for the 34.5% rise in deaths, affecting all vaccinated age groups, in 2021.
Malaysia’s department of statistics has just released their 2024 Q2 demographic data with screenshot of the infographic shown below and have issued a press release.
This release triggered the following news article, where the large 2nd quarter drop in birthrate compared to the prior year same period was discussed.
Deaths - All Cause Mortality
Malaysian deaths have been gradually increasing over time. This is expected with a growing and aging population. Between 2000 and 2020, year-on-year changes in deaths varied from -4.2% to +5.7%. Ironically, the biggest year-on-year drop in deaths came in 2020, the first year of the pandemic, when 7,284 fewer Malaysians died than in 2019!
This changed dramatically in 2021 when there was a massive black swan event2; a 34.5% increase in all-cause mortality. Deaths did not recover in 2022 or 2023, when deaths remained far higher than levels prior to 2021. This step change in deaths from 2021 onwards indicates that something catastrophic happened to the health of Malaysians in 2021, something which the population has not recovered from.
Were the Excess Deaths in 2021 Due to Covid-19?
From OWID, Malaysia reported 451 deaths as due to Covid-19 infection in 2020, 30,883 in 2021, 5,501 in 2022, 458 in 2023, and 58 in 2024, up to 28 July 2024; a total official C-19 Death toll of 37,351
There were 58,062 more (excess) registered deaths in 2021 than in 2020.
Even assuming that every single death reported as being due to Covid-19 was a real respiratory virus infection death (unlikely as there was huge pressure to over declare Covid-19 as cause of death), there are still 58,062 - 30,883 = 27,179 deaths requiring an explanation!
There is still ongoing excess mortality in 2022 and 2023, compared to 2019 and 2020 levels, even as Covid-19 attributed deaths are very low. 2022 has 32,271 and 2023 has 20,169 more deaths than 2019; there may be cumulative excess deaths from 2021 to 2023 in the range of 100,000 people! These are loved ones, who died prematurely before they were expected to.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Why Do All Vaccines Cause Harm?
An explanation of the zeta potential concept
Story at a Glance:
•Vaccines often cause various side effects, making it hard to identify common causes. Neurologist Andrew Moulden discovered that vaccines frequently trigger microstrokes, which can lead to a myriad of acute and chronic diseases.
•Forgotten research from the 1960s, shows that blood cell clumping is a root cause of many diseases—a belief also shared by Chinese Medicine.
•Colloidal chemistry and zeta potential science reveal that positive charges around blood cells cause clumping. Agents with concentrated positive charges, such as aluminum and the COVID spike protein, are especially problematic.
•Improving the physiologic zeta potential benefits a wide range of acute and chronic illnesses. A strong case can be made that many conventional and holistic therapies work in part by enhancing zeta potential.
Note: this is an abridged version of an article I previously published here. Since I receive many questions on this topic and readers wanted an concise version of it, I worked to distill it down to its key points so this topic could easily be shared with others.
Many medical problems stem from the diagnostic approach of physicians, especially with complex illnesses, which are often misdiagnosed and lead to ongoing patient struggles.
Complex conditions can present with varied symptoms across patients and resemble other illnesses (e.g., fibromyalgia vs. chronic fatigue syndrome). In turn, poorly trained physicians often default to psychiatric explanations, overlooking the true causes.
Vaccine injuries have a wide range of symptoms and hence have confused doctors for over 200 years (with many doctors in the past labeling them as “encephalitis”). Presently, I believe three main mechanisms underlie the myriad of vaccine injury:
Immune Dysfunction: Vaccines frequently cause chronic autoimmune disorders and varying degrees of immune suppression.
Cell Danger Response: Cells can enter a primitive state under threat, stopping normal mitochondrial function. This temporary state can become chronic, underlying many severe conditions. Treating this response has resolved conditions linked to vaccination, like autism.
Impaired Circulation: Vaccines can impair fluid circulation by affecting the body's zeta potential. This causes fluid clumping (i.e. micro blood clots and blood thickening) and obstructs blood flow in capillaries.
My focus was drawn to the zeta potential concept once I realized that many of the mysteries of COVID-19 (and later the COVID-19 vaccines) were due to the spike protein being extremely disruptive to the body’s zeta potential. I now believe that patient outcomes would significantly improve if the medical system prioritized the zeta potential.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Did the COVID shot kill former YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki?
I'll show you the evidence. You decide.
Wojcicki died on August 9, 2024, at the age of 56, after battling non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for two years.
She was diagnosed well after the rollout of the COVID shots.
Of the 50 cases of NSCLC reported in VAERS, nearly all of them are associated with the COVID shots.
So we really can’t rule out the possibility that Susan Wojcicki died as a result of side-effects of the vaccine she promoted on YouTube.
What do you think?
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
German Study Links Covid Shots to Surge in VITAL ORGAN DAMAGE among Children
A team of leading scientific researchers in Germany has just issued a warning to the public after finding direct links between Covid mRNA shots and vital organ damage among children.
A team of leading scientific researchers in Germany has just issued a warning to the public after finding direct links between Covid mRNA shots and vital organ damage among children.
Specifically, the researchers found that Pfizer’s mRNA injection is responsible for skyrocketing cases of Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) in children aged 5 to 11 years old.
IgG4-RD is a condition that causes inflammation inside the body and damages internal organs, according to Oxford University.
It can affect many different organs, meaning people can have wide-ranging symptoms.
The pancreas is most commonly affected, followed by the bile ducts in the liver, the salivary glands, and the kidneys.
It is difficult to diagnose as there is no single test so it can often go unrecorded.
Led by physician-investigator Dr. Robin Kobbe of the University Medical Center Hamburg, the study sought to identify the cause of a surge in IgG4-RD in children.
The study, published in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, found that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA shot caused the risk of IgG4-RD to spike one year after the second dose of the injection.
Kobbe and his team warn that the timespan between the injection and diagnoses may have previously made it difficult for doctors to link the shot to cases of IgG4-RD.
The German team is now raising the alarm about the importance of better understanding mRNA vaccine–specific IgG4 responses in all age groups.
They note that the anticipated growth in mRNA vaccines heading toward licensure is of grave concern.
While this German study finds a spike in organ damage in children 1 year after being injected with a Covid shot, comparable findings have been reported in adults.
The researchers warn that further investigations must be conducted to analyze the risks on a population level.
“IgG4 responses should gain more attention in health and disease, especially in the context of mRNA vaccination,” they assert.
“Understanding the unusual mechanism triggering IgG4 production is crucial, as more mRNA vaccines are currently under development and could hit the global market soon.”
This study comes amid mounting concerns about the risks to children, and adults, from the injections.
A growing number of experts and studies continue to provide evidence indicating a major health crisis among those who have received the shots.
As Slay News reported last week, a bombshell new study from top scientists at the prestigious Oxford University has raised fresh concerns about the dangers of injecting children with Covid mRNA shots.
The study uses official UK government data provided by the National Health Service (NHS) England.
NHS England granted the researchers access to the OpenSAFELY-TPP database to study the effect of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid mRNA shot on over one million children aged 5-15.
The results of the new Oxford University study were published in the MedRxiv journal.
The study found that there were zero deaths from COVID-19 in any of the groups studied.
No unvaccinated or vaccinated kids died of COVID-19.
The researchers note that this proves the Covid shots did not save any lives among the children analyzed.
Additionally, the study found that the shots made no difference to COVID-19 infection rates among children.
However, the study did find that large numbers of children suffered from heart damage after receiving the injection.
Meanwhile, leading pharmaceutical scientists in Japan have just exposed a staggering surge in the risk of heart failure for people of all ages who have been injected with a Covid mRNA shot, as Slay News reported.
According to a team of Japanese researchers from the Division of Pharmacodynamics at Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy and Yokohama General Hospital, the risk of heart failure surges by up to 4,900% after a person receives a Covid mRNA injection.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
More evidence that the COVID shots did NOT reduce mortality
The Lancet paper claimed 20M lives have been saved by the COVID shots. Two data sources (both in public view for years) show the shots were all downside risk.
Executive summary
Mainstream medicine, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and others believe that the COVID shots have saved 20M people from dying from COVID worldwide.
I’ve been looking for these 20M people and still haven’t found any.
But what I did find is two more authoritative gold-standard sources that confirm that the shots did not reduce COVID mortality.
Previous evidence
In the past, I’ve cited:
The US Nursing Home data as proof that the COVID shots didn’t reduce COVID death rates in nursing homes
The JAMA VA study as proof that COVID shots didn’t reduce the risk of hospitalization from COVID
The Cleveland Clinic study as proof that the COVID shots increased the risk of being infected with COVID
The lack of any success stories. I couldn’t find a single one.
The COVID shot failure anecdotes like Apple Valley Village where the all-cause death rate skyrocketed by 8x post shot (and the CFR went from 0% to over 30%) and Jay Bonnar.
Cases and deaths from OWID
We’ve always had the data proving the vaccines didn’t work. It was hiding in public view.
Yet despite the data availability, there wasn’t an epidemiologist in the world who would look at it!
What data am I talking about?
The case and death data from Our World in Data!
I extracted that data and plotted the case fatality rate:
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
