Re: Financial topics
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:44 am
In respect to the sectorial kuznet cycle I seen, and the GD two cylinder decadal modeling not enough sectors got repaired
between the ears quick enough which is evident. On the other hand they will comprise a normalcy bias as the economy shifted
from the seven sisters in relationship to the five pillars as we are which is the mainstay and reality of contextual fingerprints in this malady to date.
Anyway the paranoid and delusional of the rent seekers are infecting the conversation again with the thought the rentiers are the issue
and the data points are clearly of math point blank explain that anyways. Day by day the wasting appears to gain traction and as we know
the usual suspects in relationship to napoleonic as opposed common law.
Akhil Khanna notes "deflation is more likely because the world economy has been in an inflationary environment for last many decades and the probability of deflation is higher for the next no. of decades. Normal economic cycle. The credit outstanding in total is shrinking and the velocity of money changing hands is slowing down much faster than the central bankers are printing money. If only printing money led to inflation you would have already had hyperinflation in Japan which has being doing so since last more than two decades. The only thing they have to show after so many years is high debt and recessionary economy. What makes them think that more of the same treatment will give different results? Banks are evaluating the assets in their books on the basis of cost price (rather than on cost price or market price whichever is lower) which helps them to portray a much stronger balance sheet than actually is thus hiding losses.
Also he noted "All the money being printed by Central Bankers around the world is not causing inflation because it is not reaching the masses in the form of growth in the economy or loans to businesses. The money printed is sitting in the banks and is being either used to speculate in the commodity, currency and equity markets or being used to fund previously incurred losses."
I would also note how many no longer sleep with dirt floors as the first thing they step on in the morning.
I find it troublesome nets are installed in places of production as we seen and unaudited imported goods to even basic levels.
Nations choking in induced filth which is the handmaiden of avarice.
As we noted a few days ago Higg and conveyed Jevons paradox of doing more with less and the apparent sticky wage conversation since
the inception of 1993 forumed with the current new application of the same playbook is not trended properly to varying discussions
as formentioned with the current kuznet cycle for the simple sake of conveyance. Its there and plain to see even before Alfred Marshall
and David Hume to Mikolaj Kopernik writings on fiat.
The malady is the Cambridge Approach as it took a slightly different approach to the quantity theory, focusing on money demand instead of money supply. They argued that a certain portion of the money supply will not be used for transactions; instead, it will be held for the convenience and security of having cash on hand.
This covers the thesis plan from 1983 as forumed alredy. The inital annual liquidation rate of savers. No accidents, and they already knew from 1983 of the CCI program policy framework that existed and before also. As we noted very early and correctly here the LSE replacement announced recently.
Dr. Quigley knew this also as bubba was sent to be "confirmed". The Fabian simple resolve of over time...... As we also say they will be known by the fruit they bear
“social silences”
I have been watching the over compensation as a burn rate on a few funds so it will take longer to repair "to clear" and the wasting continues IMO......
The longer the spice flows the longer the wars will wait...
Step one. Turn off the TV. Indeed
between the ears quick enough which is evident. On the other hand they will comprise a normalcy bias as the economy shifted
from the seven sisters in relationship to the five pillars as we are which is the mainstay and reality of contextual fingerprints in this malady to date.
Anyway the paranoid and delusional of the rent seekers are infecting the conversation again with the thought the rentiers are the issue
and the data points are clearly of math point blank explain that anyways. Day by day the wasting appears to gain traction and as we know
the usual suspects in relationship to napoleonic as opposed common law.
Akhil Khanna notes "deflation is more likely because the world economy has been in an inflationary environment for last many decades and the probability of deflation is higher for the next no. of decades. Normal economic cycle. The credit outstanding in total is shrinking and the velocity of money changing hands is slowing down much faster than the central bankers are printing money. If only printing money led to inflation you would have already had hyperinflation in Japan which has being doing so since last more than two decades. The only thing they have to show after so many years is high debt and recessionary economy. What makes them think that more of the same treatment will give different results? Banks are evaluating the assets in their books on the basis of cost price (rather than on cost price or market price whichever is lower) which helps them to portray a much stronger balance sheet than actually is thus hiding losses.
Also he noted "All the money being printed by Central Bankers around the world is not causing inflation because it is not reaching the masses in the form of growth in the economy or loans to businesses. The money printed is sitting in the banks and is being either used to speculate in the commodity, currency and equity markets or being used to fund previously incurred losses."
I would also note how many no longer sleep with dirt floors as the first thing they step on in the morning.
I find it troublesome nets are installed in places of production as we seen and unaudited imported goods to even basic levels.
Nations choking in induced filth which is the handmaiden of avarice.
As we noted a few days ago Higg and conveyed Jevons paradox of doing more with less and the apparent sticky wage conversation since
the inception of 1993 forumed with the current new application of the same playbook is not trended properly to varying discussions
as formentioned with the current kuznet cycle for the simple sake of conveyance. Its there and plain to see even before Alfred Marshall
and David Hume to Mikolaj Kopernik writings on fiat.
The malady is the Cambridge Approach as it took a slightly different approach to the quantity theory, focusing on money demand instead of money supply. They argued that a certain portion of the money supply will not be used for transactions; instead, it will be held for the convenience and security of having cash on hand.
This covers the thesis plan from 1983 as forumed alredy. The inital annual liquidation rate of savers. No accidents, and they already knew from 1983 of the CCI program policy framework that existed and before also. As we noted very early and correctly here the LSE replacement announced recently.
Dr. Quigley knew this also as bubba was sent to be "confirmed". The Fabian simple resolve of over time...... As we also say they will be known by the fruit they bear
“social silences”
I have been watching the over compensation as a burn rate on a few funds so it will take longer to repair "to clear" and the wasting continues IMO......
The longer the spice flows the longer the wars will wait...
Step one. Turn off the TV. Indeed