FullMoon wrote: ↑Tue May 06, 2025 11:57 am
Navigator, in your book you outlined post-war chaos and eventual collapse into a second and worse war. Do you still follow this scenario? Wouldn't this make any 'victory' essentially a pyrrhic victory?
First some comments on the current overall situation:
1. India's strikes on Pakistan terrorist camps seems to be a very intelligently measured response. No direct attacks against Pakistani military targets, no violation of Pakistani airspace by Indian Air Force aircraft. Hopefully Pakistan will respond in kind at a lower level and thus it eventually de-escalates for the time being.
2. I do believe that Trump will (in conjunction with the Israelis) attack Iran by Air if the Iranians don't make a deal on their nuclear program. The Iranians are in a very difficult place right now, their economy is a disaster, they lost their significant allies in Syria and Lebanon. So maybe they make a short term deal.
If Trump does attack Iran, hopefully we get results akin to the Israelis in their response to Iran's missile attacks. We can easily "turn out the lights" for all of Iran (destroying what is left of their electrical grid). But then they might activate multiple sleeper cells in the US.
3. The situation in China is getting out of hand for the CCP. Demonstrations are growing, along with it anti-government sentiment.
Look at reports on YouTube by Laowhy86 or China Uncensored:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YaPgVomKhw&t=480s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slTe66qrZv8
Now to answer FullMoon's question - what would follow WW3?
I do believe that the US will come out of WW3 in a fashion very similar to how France and Great Britain came out of WW1. We win but the cost will be significant. We will lose our best and brightest, not to mention our most patriotic.
WW1 is generally viewed as a complete and senseless waste. But it wasn't. It had to be fought to destroy the absolute monarchies that started it, and their power. And WW1 did just that. But it also severely weakened those that bore the brunt of the fight against those monarchies.
I believe that similarly WW3 will need to be fought as giving in to Xi/Putin/Iranian Ayatollahs or allowing them to win would be an outright disaster for humanity. (As would have a post WW1 era led by a then insatiable Kaiser Wilhelm II). It would be much worse to roll over and give in to them as it would be to actually fight the conflict.
The weakened state of the US after WW3 would, unfortunately, greatly enable the deluded left. The country would be effectively bankrupt and the economic ruin worldwide would be devastating. In this situation, you would see things akin to post WW1 France/Great Britain in the US, and post WW1 Germany/Russia in the rest of the world. God alone knows what the left would do without the ability to fund its hare-brained schemes using debt financing, but rest assured that it will not be to the benefit of society at large.
The most probable outcome is the rise of a Mao/Stalin/Hitler type, along with a total collapse of Europe, and probably Japan. The US would stay stable for a little while, then unravel as it attempts unsuccessfully to return to a pre-war situation.