Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

CH86 wrote:
Even If the regime Falls, it would likely result in something similar to what happened after the USSR fell. A republic lead by people who were formerly bureaucrats under the Mullahs. The Shah is unlikely to ever return to Iran, just like the Romanovs did not return to Russia after collapse of the USSR.

CH86 wrote:

Lion and Sun wrote:

CH86 wrote:LOL, Actual Iranians want either the islamists to remain in power or a liberalization reform of the Islamic republic, no serious contenders for power in Iran or opponents of the regime either since 1980 as advocated a return of the Shah. Only Boomer ideologues in the west who regard alternative systems of government to liberal democracy within the west and alternative trade regimes other than open borders both inside and outside of the west, to be fundamentally illegitimate; are hoping for a return of the shah to Iran.

You are not Iranian. 'Actual Iranians' are fed up with corrupt mullahs and have been exhausted by decades of moving backwards, watching the Shah's hard work being completely destroyed. Young Iranians want progress. Only the Pahlavi's improved Iran. The Shah was a great man. History has proven that to everyone, even his detractors.

Rest in peace our beloved Shah.

Even If the regime Falls, it would likely result in something similar to what happened after the USSR fell. A republic lead by people who were formerly bureaucrats under the Mullahs. The Shah is unlikely to ever return to Iran, just like the Romanovs did not return to Russia after collapse of the USSR.

Lion and Sun wrote:

CH86 wrote:LOL, Actual Iranians want either the islamists to remain in power or a liberalization reform of the Islamic republic, no serious contenders for power in Iran or opponents of the regime either since 1980 as advocated a return of the Shah. Only Boomer ideologues in the west who regard alternative systems of government to liberal democracy within the west and alternative trade regimes other than open borders both inside and outside of the west, to be fundamentally illegitimate; are hoping for a return of the shah to Iran.

You are not Iranian. 'Actual Iranians' are fed up with corrupt mullahs and have been exhausted by decades of moving backwards, watching the Shah's hard work being completely destroyed. Young Iranians want progress. Only the Pahlavi's improved Iran. The Shah was a great man. History has proven that to everyone, even his detractors.

Rest in peace our beloved Shah.

CH86 wrote:LOL, Actual Iranians want either the islamists to remain in power or a liberalization reform of the Islamic republic, no serious contenders for power in Iran or opponents of the regime either since 1980 as advocated a return of the Shah. Only Boomer ideologues in the west who regard alternative systems of government to liberal democracy within the west and alternative trade regimes other than open borders both inside and outside of the west, to be fundamentally illegitimate; are hoping for a return of the shah to Iran.

Lion and Sun wrote: > A few days ago workmen in Tehran uncovered the mummified body of
> Reza Shah in the ruins of his mausoleum. The Islamic government
> has always claimed (and still does) that the Shah took his
> father's body with him into exile when he left Iran (something the
> Pahlavi family has always denied). This has generated a lot of
> excitement in Iran.

> Considering the mass protests that have occurred recently in Iran,
> what chance do you think a revolution could overthrow the Mullahs?
> And just as importantly, could the Shah be restored to power?
> Republican government is alien to Persians. Isn't it natural for
> Persians to have a Shah leading them? What do you think the
> chances are now of a counter revolution in Iran?

Tom Mazanec wrote:

John wrote:

Russian Troll wrote:Your idiotic and unresearched excuse for a blog post ignores several facts:

1) Syria has NEVER HAD chemical weapons ever.
2) Al Assad ALREADY handed of ALL of Syira's chemical weapons back when Obama demanded it.
3) There WAS NO chemical weapons attack in Duma. It never happened.
4) The chemical weapons attack in Duma was CONCLUSIVELY conducted by Al Qaeda, not the Syrian regime.
5) All 105 missiles of the coalition attack were SHOT DOWN causing no damage.
6) The facilities destroyed by the coalition had NOTHING TO DO WITH Syria's chemical weapons.
7) The US has NO RIGHT to interfere in the region of Damascus, which is part of the INDISPUTABLE SOVEREIGN TERRITORY OF CHINA!

Lol! I wasn't sure at first whether you were serious, as these are
all claims made by Russian officials and trolls on a regular basis.
It's only your last line that makes it clear that you're joking.
Thanks for the laugh!

I would have thought a Russian troll would say Damascus is part of Russia.

John wrote:

Russian Troll wrote:Your idiotic and unresearched excuse for a blog post ignores several facts:

1) Syria has NEVER HAD chemical weapons ever.
2) Al Assad ALREADY handed of ALL of Syira's chemical weapons back when Obama demanded it.
3) There WAS NO chemical weapons attack in Duma. It never happened.
4) The chemical weapons attack in Duma was CONCLUSIVELY conducted by Al Qaeda, not the Syrian regime.
5) All 105 missiles of the coalition attack were SHOT DOWN causing no damage.
6) The facilities destroyed by the coalition had NOTHING TO DO WITH Syria's chemical weapons.
7) The US has NO RIGHT to interfere in the region of Damascus, which is part of the INDISPUTABLE SOVEREIGN TERRITORY OF CHINA!

Lol! I wasn't sure at first whether you were serious, as these are
all claims made by Russian officials and trolls on a regular basis.
It's only your last line that makes it clear that you're joking.
Thanks for the laugh!