Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort Study Finds Vaccinated Children Sicker Across All 22 Chronic Disease Categories

Our reanalysis of the largest U.S. vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study ever conducted reveals 54% higher cancer rates and 549% higher autism-related disorders among vaccinated children.

Our newly published, peer-reviewed critique and independent reanalysis of the Henry Ford vaccinated–unvaccinated birth cohort study (Lamerato et al.) — revealed at the U.S. Senate Hearing on September 9, 2025 — shows that the original authors failed to analyze or disclose the dramatic proportional differences present in their own data.

Authored by John W. Oller, Jr., PhD; Daniel Broudy, PhD; and Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, this peer-review and reanalysis provides the first accurate proportional interpretation of the dataset.

The Lamerato et al. study of a total population of 18,468 individuals between birth and 18 years of age during the years from 2000 to 2016 — of which the 16,511 in the vaccinated cohort received a median of 18 vaccines, whereas the 1,957 in the unvaccinated cohort received none at all — probably represents the most comprehensive real-world comparison of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children ever conducted within a self-contained whole population in a full-service integrated health system in the US.

For context, we calculated that the current CDC childhood immunization schedule now contains at least 81 doses of vaccines by age 18 — more than four times higher than the median exposure in the Henry Ford cohort. This means that the dramatic disparities we uncovered in this dataset emerge even at a fraction of the full CDC schedule.

In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, December 1-December 8, 2025

Reality star Chad Spodick (42); dancers Donyelle Jones (46,C), Criscilla Anderson; movie exec Tammie Rosen (C); bassist Justin Baren (40); hoopster Elden Campbell; NASCAR's Michael Annett (39); & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Scott Adams' prostate cancer now in his bones; Denver LB Alex Singleton has testicular cancer; CA: Ottawa coach Carla McLeod has breast cancer UK: ex-PM David Cameron has prostate cancer

Utica coach Kevin Dineen has pancreatic cancer; JA: Miss Jamaica "isn't doing well" since her collapse on stage; NZ boxer David Nyika’s fiancée Lexy Thornberry has head/neck cancer; more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Scott Adams admits anti-vaxxers were right: ‘They Are the Winners’ in health outcomes

In a heartbreaking and brutally honest video statement, Dilbert series creator Scott Adams publicly admitted that those who refused COVID-19 vaccines made the right choice—while his own decision to take the shots may now cost him his life.

Adams, recently diagnosed with advanced-stage prostate cancer, acknowledged that anti-vaxxers—who distrusted government and corporate narratives—now enjoy better health, natural immunity, and peace of mind. His emotional admission underscores mounting evidence linking mRNA vaccines to turbo cancers, immune dysfunction, and other severe health risks.

"The Anti-Vaxxers Were Right"
In the video, Adams—once a vocal supporter of COVID-19 vaccines—conceded defeat:

"The anti-vaxxers appear to be right. Somebody who did not get vaccinated got a little Omicron or maybe even a worse one, but recovered—now you've got natural immunity and no vaccination in you. Can we all agree that was the winning path?"

He continued, "The smartest, happiest people are the ones who didn’t get the vaccination and are still alive... The anti-vaxxers clearly are the winners at this point. And I think it’ll probably stay that way."

Adams, known for his sharp wit and analytical mind, admitted that his own "fancy analytics" led him astray, while those who relied on simple distrust of authority came out ahead.

Turbo Cancers and the Cost of Compliance
Adams’ diagnosis aligns with a growing wave of "turbo cancers"—aggressive, fast-growing malignancies linked to mRNA vaccines. Health experts, including independent researchers like Mike Adams (no relation) of Brighteon Broadcast News, have long warned that the shots could trigger catastrophic immune suppression, spike protein toxicity, and DNA damage.

Mike Adams, who has extensively covered vaccine injuries, called Scott’s video "courageous" but tragic. "This is not the way we wanted to be right," he said. "People who took the jabs are now dying from turbo cancers. That’s not a victory—it’s a preventable tragedy."

CHD Asks FDA to Revoke COVID Vaccine Licenses, Calls on Public to Submit ‘Hundreds of Thousands’ of Comments

Children’s Health Defense filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA, urging the agency to revoke all existing licenses granted to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is asking the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to revoke the licenses for all Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

On Monday, CHD filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA and is urging the public, including healthcare workers, parents and military members, to submit comments on the petition.

“The FDA granted full licensure to these vaccines without requiring the manufacturers to meet the legal standards that typically govern licensed vaccines,” said CHD CEO Mary Holland, a co-author of the petition. “It’s critical that the FDA follow its own rules.”

Holland said CHD launched the petition after an investigation determined that under the Biden administration, the FDA “violated its own rules egregiously” by granting biologics licenses to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

“CHD is supporting the transparency and integrity at the FDA that the American people deserve, and that U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has promised,” she added.

The petition, based on research by pharmaceutical and medical device industry veteran Sasha Latypova, asks FDA Commissioner Martin A. Makary to determine that the two mRNA vaccines — Comirnaty and Spikevax — are misbranded and adulterated.

A Citizen Petition is a formal request to the agency to take regulatory action. Citizen Petitions, typically submitted by an organization, require extensive documentation of the issue and the legal basis for the claim.

In its petition, CHD outlines how the experimental vaccines passed through the regulatory process and were granted full Biologics License Application (BLA) approval without meeting the required standards for that approval.

Latypova was the first to break the story that the vaccines won BLA approval without meeting the proper licensing standards. She told The Defender:

“It is important to point out that this petition is not about science, safety or efficacy of these products. We focus on the law and pharmaceutical regulations, and we outline many severe violations of the BLA standards that require immediate action by the FDA.”

The petition calls on the FDA to properly designate the shots as emergency use authorization (EUA) shots for as long as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Declaration of Emergency, issued and repeatedly renewed under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act, remains in effect.

Currently, the emergency declaration is set to last until the end of 2029.

Read the full petition and cover letter here.

‘EUA vaccines cannot be merely marketed under a BLA label’

Both Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax were initially developed and deployed under EUA early in the COVID-19 emergency period.

Drugs made available under EUA don’t have to meet the same rigorous manufacturing, testing and clinical trial requirements mandatory for drugs that receive full BLA approval — the process the agency uses to license “biologics,” defined as medications created from living organisms. Vaccines fall under the FDA’s definition of a biologic.

The petition alleges the FDA allowed the vaccines to “jump tracks,” by transitioning them from EUA status to full licensure without requiring Pfizer or Moderna to perform the types of clinical investigation normally required for new, BLA-approved drugs.

“EUA vaccines cannot be merely marketed under a BLA label, however,” the petition states.”There are licensing standards that need to be met but are not.”

In the race to roll out the vaccines to the public during Operation Warp Speed, the FDA waived critical, legally required components of BLA compliance, the petition states. These critical components include Institutional Review Board (IRB) oversight, documented informed consent, validated manufacturing processes, good laboratory practice in preclinical testing and representative clinical trial data.

“The U.S. law permits EUA products to be adulterated and misbranded under the PREP Act declaration of public health emergency,” Latypova said. However, she added:

“Misbranding BLA products is a severe violation of the federal law. By claiming that these substandard, demonstrably misbranded and adulterated products are ‘BLA licensed vaccines,’ the FDA is abrogating its duty and continues to deteriorate what is left of the public trust in health regulations in the U.S.”

The petition notes that since the drugs first won BLA licensure, both Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax labels have had to be “substantially revised” with indication and usage restrictions, and the companies had to add warnings for myocarditis and pericarditis.

During the pandemic, the FDA authorized the vaccines for people ages 6 months and older. Today, they are licensed for more limited groups. Moderna’s Spikevax is licensed for adults age 65 and older, and for everyone 6 months to 64 years old who has at least one underlying condition that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19.

Pfizer’s shot is licensed for adults 65 and older, and people ages 5 through 64 with at least one underlying condition that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19.

FDA ‘failed to follow its own regulatory guidelines’

CHD’s petition alleges the FDA “failed to follow its own regulatory guidelines when it illegally granted BLAs to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.”

According to the petition, leaked European Medicines Agency (EMA) documents from late 2020 — documented by The BMJ — indicate that European regulators issued “three Quality Major Objections” to Pfizer’s manufacturing process, which made the vaccine maker out of compliance with existing regulations.

The leaked documents showed discrepancies between the material used to make the shots tested in the Phase 3 clinical trial and the final product intended for commercial distribution.

Email correspondence between EMA staff, senior agency executives and colleagues at the FDA revealed that U.K. regulators “were under massive political pressure to overlook all regulatory deficiencies,” and that concerns raised by staff reviewers were ignored or overlooked.

The CHD petition also alleges:

Pfizer’s trial data cannot lawfully serve as the basis for BLA labeling because clinical-trial batches were produced through a different process than those later used for the commercial batches, and because the clinical trials had large data gaps — they lacked clear efficacy endpoints and participants were unblinded.

Pfizer and Moderna initiated human testing before completing nonclinical assessments that, by law, must precede human dosing for novel biologics.

The toxicology and biodistribution studies for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines didn’t follow Good Laboratory Practices, and sometimes relied on surrogate mRNA constructs that were used as a stand-in for the final vaccine formulations.

Moderna’s only biodistribution study was conducted exclusively on male rats, but the vaccine is approved for use in all sexes. Those studies also found statistically significant skeletal abnormalities in the offspring of animals exposed to Moderna’s vaccine — findings that merit further investigation before licensure.

Because the vaccines were treated as EUA countermeasures rather than new products under investigation, the trials did not involve IRB oversight or the type of informed consent procedures required under U.S. law for a clinical investigation.

The petition cites public FDA advisory committee discussions and a declaration by former FDA official Dr. Peter Marks, in which officials explicitly stated that the vaccines would not use the typical investigational regulatory pathways, because they didn’t want Operation Warp Speed to be limited by the requirements of IRB and informed consent.

The vaccines — labeled today as fully licensed — are in fact EUA products “in disguise,” bearing BLA labels without satisfying the statutory standards those labels require.

An EUA product cannot be retroactively deemed BLA-compliant, so the FDA must withdraw all current licenses and take corrective action to bring the vaccines into alignment with federal law. The petition cites a history of federal court cases that have distinguished EUA and BLA products.

According to the petition, the American public assumes that licensed vaccines satisfy strict manufacturing, testing and disclosure standards, and that the FDA’s actions during the pandemic compromised these expectations.

“Reversing these licensures or granting EUA status is imperative,” the petition states. “Acting on this Citizen Petition will enhance the FDA’s credibility with the public. Given the obvious safety, effectiveness, labeling, and branding concerns over mRNA COVID-19 vaccines detailed above along with anticipated comments on this docket, we respectfully appeal to the FDA to implement the actions requested in this Citizen Petition.”

FDA Expands Probe Into COVID Vaccine-Related Deaths to Include Adults

The FDA is expanding its investigation into reports of deaths following COVID-19 vaccines to include adults, after initially looking into the deaths of children who received the vaccine.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is expanding its probe into COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths to adults, after initially confirming that the agency was investigating the deaths of 10 children who died after receiving the shot.

The “FDA is doing a thorough investigation, across multiple age groups, of deaths potentially related to COVID vaccines,” a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) spokesperson told The Defender today. HHS provided no further details.

Bloomberg is credited with first reporting on the expanded inquiry.

In September, the FDA initiated an “intense investigation” into the deaths of children who received the COVID-19 vaccine, drawing on reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a surveillance system jointly run by the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As of press time, the FDA had not issued a statement explaining why it is expanding its investigation into COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths.

As of Aug. 28, there were 38,773 reports of deaths filed in VAERS among all age groups, according to the OpenVAERS Project. More recent numbers are not publicly available.

However, the actual number of deaths is likely much higher, since VAERS has historically been shown to report less than 1% of all adverse events.

A 2022 audit by React19, an organization advocating on behalf of COVID-19 vaccine injury victims and their families, found that 1 in 3 COVID-19 vaccine adverse event reports in VAERS were not posted publicly or were deleted.

Leaked memo confirmed ‘at least’ 10 kids died from COVID vaccine

The FDA’s expanded inquiry into COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths comes roughly two weeks after an internal analysis outlined in a leaked memo to staff revealed that “at least” 10 children died from the COVID-19 vaccine.

In the memo, obtained by The Washington Post, the agency’s top vaccine regulator said the agency will make changes to how it approves all vaccines.

Dr. Vinay Prasad, who heads up the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said a recent review of 96 deaths among children ages 7 to 16 concluded that “no fewer than 10” were related to the shot. The deaths were reported to VAERS between 2021 and 2024.

According to the memo, the estimated 10 deaths is “certainly an underestimate due to underreporting, and inherent bias in attribution.”

Prasad implied that the deaths were linked to myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle.

“This is a profound revelation,” Prasad wrote. “For the first time, the US FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children.”

EXCLUSIVE: Internal documents show Paul Offit made false claims on CNN

Newly obtained emails contradict key claims made by the high-profile vaccine commentator.

When Paul Offit appeared on CNN last Friday to discuss the CDC’s contentious hepatitis B meeting, he spoke with the certainty that has made him one of legacy media’s go-to commentators on vaccines.

Offit told viewers he had not been invited to speak at the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP) meeting that was unfolding in Atlanta that very day.

That claim was false.

CDC officials had contacted him repeatedly — via emails, phone calls and a speaker-request form — inviting him to present at the upcoming meeting.

Offit acknowledged receiving a request, but then told the audience he was not invited to attend.

From there, the misinformation only escalated.

He warned viewers that “millions” of Americans were silently carrying hepatitis B, claimed that “50% of people in this country” were chronically infected without knowing it, and suggested newborns were at risk through everyday contact with nannies, daycare workers and family members.

None of those claims were true.

But the CNN host did not challenge him. No fact-checker intervened. And once again, a highly amplified “expert” delivered a series of false statements that left the public with a distorted picture of the facts.

Offit’s false account of the ACIP invitation
Offit began by correcting the anchor’s introduction. She noted that he had been invited to present at ACIP and had declined. He promptly replied:

“I actually wasn’t invited to present at today’s meeting. I was invited back in October to come speak about vaccines to this group.”

The host sought clarity:

“So just to be clear, you were invited back in October to speak, and you declined that.”

Offit replied:

“It was a vague recommendation to come speak to us… The way that it was framed today that I was asked to come speak today about this subject, that’s not true.”

But emails obtained exclusively by MD Reports tell a different story.

On 23 October, a CDC official emailed Offit with the subject line “Speaker Invitation – ACIP meeting.” The message was explicit: “I am reaching out to invite you as a speaker to an upcoming ACIP meeting and would appreciate the opportunity to connect…”

When that email bounced, the CDC re-sent it to Offit’s University of Pennsylvania address— the one his own institution had confirmed as correct. A CDC staffer also phoned him and left a voicemail.

This interview was recorded approximately a year ago, but nearly every word remains valuable. Since then, the predictions made have proven disturbingly accurate. Ozempic has been approved for expanded use and is now widely reimbursed by insurance companies.

The pharmaceutical industry has created a system where every major institution—medical schools, research organizations, professional societies, media, and even civil rights groups—profits when Americans get sick and stay sick. These companies pay doctors directly to prescribe their products, fund the research that claims their drugs work, control the medical education that teaches doctors what to prescribe, and buy off the news media that should be investigating these practices.

The result is that 80 percent of American adults are overweight or obese, rates of diabetes and prediabetes continue to climb, and the proposed solution is a drug that costs $20,000 per year, must be taken for life, causes severe gastrointestinal problems in many patients, and doesn’t address the root cause of the problem. The fact that this drug was fast-tracked for government funding while metabolic disease continues to worsen reveals the moral bankruptcy of the system.

With grateful thanks to Tucker Carlson and Mr. Means, here is their interview. It was edited for readability.

Obesity is not an Ozempic deficiency. This simple fact exposes the fundamental corruption at the heart of the pharmaceutical industry’s latest blockbuster drug. When 80 percent of American adults are overweight or obese due to environmental factors—subsidized junk food, corrupted dietary guidelines, and a food system designed to addict—the answer is not a $20,000-per-year injectable drug that must be taken for life.

Yet that is precisely the solution the pharmaceutical industry has sold to America. Through systematic manipulation of medical research, regulatory capture, and direct payments to doctors and institutions, drug manufacturers have positioned Ozempic and similar GLP-1 drugs to become the most expensive medical intervention in U.S. history. The predictions made when this strategy began have proven disturbingly accurate. The drug received expanded approval, widespread insurance reimbursement, and government funding. Lawsuits over severe side effects have materialized. The corruption has continued. And obesity rates keep climbing—because the system profits from managing disease, not curing it.

If you clean a dirty fish tank, you clean the tank—you don’t drug the fish. In America, the tank is filthy. Fifty percent of teens and 80 percent of adults are overweight. This happened in one generation. Americans didn’t systematically become lazier over the past 40 years. Something in the environment changed.

Invalid Study from French National Agency Falsely Claims COVID-19 Vaccines Do Not Increase Mortality

Misclassification of vaccine exposure, incomplete death data, healthy vaccinee bias, fake vaccine cards over 4 years leading to false conclusions

STUDY: Common Vaccines Linked to 38-50% Increased Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer’s

The single largest vaccine–dementia study ever conducted (n=13.3 million) finds risk intensifies with more doses, remains elevated for a full decade, and is strongest after flu and pneumococcal shots.

The single largest and most rigorous study ever conducted on vaccines and dementia — spanning 13.3 million UK adults — has uncovered a deeply troubling pattern: those who received common adult vaccines faced a significantly higher risk of both dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.

The risk intensifies with more doses, remains elevated for a full decade, and is strongest after influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. With each layer of statistical adjustment, the signal doesn’t fade — it becomes sharper, more consistent, and increasingly difficult to explain away.

A Signal in the German Data?

This analysis is based solely on publicly available mortality data and official labels, which may be incomplete or imprecise. Interpretations reflect statistical patterns, not causal conclusions.

10. Conclusion: a signal, not a verdict

The German state‑level data from 2020–2023 contain a clear structural pattern: by the third pandemic year, higher‑vaccination states experienced larger increases in all‑cause excess mortality, and that pattern is not well accounted for by COVID‑labelled deaths, infections, age structure, economic indicators, or a simple East/West split.

Within the limits of this dataset and this design, that pattern is statistically robust. Its cause is unknown.

The appropriate response is neither denial nor premature certainty. It is to:

Treat the association as a hypothesis‑generating signal.

Be explicit about the limitations (small N, ecological design, measurement assumptions).

Encourage open, transparent follow‑up work with richer data.

Science cannot promise comforting answers, but it can insist on honesty about the structure of the evidence. Here, the evidence suggests that something in Germany’s late‑pandemic mortality landscape does not fit comfortably inside the official narratives.