Religion and Vaccine Arguments

As requested, this sub-forum is for partying, fun, gossip, conundrums, flirting, comedy, tragedy, or whatever.
tim
Posts: 1688
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://supersally.substack.com/p/phili ... istics-544
Philippines 2024 Vital Statistics Full Release Gives Evidence of Failing Population Health! Births down 6.2%. Deaths up 1%. Infant Mortality up, Fetal Death Rate up, Maternal Mortality up.

Leading causes of death are circulatory (37.9%) including cardiovascular (19.1%) and cerebrovascular (9.8%), respiratory diseases (11.4%) of which pneumonia 6.7%, neoplasms 11%, and diabetes (6.3%).
The Philippines has released its official 2024 marriage (25Nov2025), birth (22Dec2025), and death (30Jan2026) reports. Key overall findings are presented in this article for information and reference. I will prepare some breakdown analyses of regional and cause of death data for publication in coming weeks.

2024 Population Births and Deaths

Compared to 2023, 2024 registered births fell by 6.2% while deaths rose by 1%.

There were 705,714 (51.9%) male births and 653,275 (48.1%) female births. The drop in female births between 2023 and 2024 was 6.03%, while the drop in male births was 6.3%. Total loss of births since 2012, the Philippines peak birth year, is 24.1%. The majority of this loss (18.8%) occurred between 2019 and 2025. Such a rapid loss in births is historically unprecedented, particularly considering the young population of the Philippines (median age around 26).
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1688
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://gillianjamieson.substack.com/p/ ... e-mevissen
The WHO interferes in the EMF scientific review process reveals Meike Mevissen

As published in the Daily Sceptic on 5th February 2026
Your smartphone, your Wi-Fi, your smart meter, your iPad and much else all use radio-frequency radiation (RFR), but do you know what physical effect this is having on your and your family’s health? Where will you find the truth? Although we only ever hear publicly that RFR “should” be safe, a glimpse behind the scenes reveals a raging battle amongst scientists in an attempt to control the narrative.

This struggle comes at a time when the governments of the world are awaiting the forthcoming WHO Environmental Health Criteria monograph, which will pronounce on the health risks or otherwise of exposure to electromagnetic fields including RFR. Even more critical is the upcoming possible reclassification of RFR as a probable cancer risk by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The stakes could not be higher.

At the centre of this battle are Meike Mevissen on one side and Ken Karipidis on the other. They are the lead authors of two of the 12 systematic reviews commissioned by the WHO EMF Project on the health effects of radio-frequency radiation (RFR). Only one of these 12 reviews was considered by experts from the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) to be well-executed, and this was the one by Mevissen et al., which concluded that there is high certainty evidence that RF-EMF exposure increases the incidence of malignant schwannomas (heart tumours) and gliomas (brain tumours) in rats, with moderate certainty evidence of an increased risk of rare tumours in the adrenal glands and in the liver. This RF-EMF is just the same type of radiation that is emitted by your phone and that you hold to your head and keep in your pocket, and that is constantly by your side.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1688
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/ep ... rength-the
The FDA greenlit a human trial of an "immortality elixir" containing SV40!

I wish I were making this up, but I am not that creative.
Yes, cancer cells are technically immortal. Also, for this elixir to “work”, a continuous regimen of antibiotics and steroids needs to be taken indefinitely!

On January 27, the press brought this great news for the immortality seekers: “In major test for longevity field, FDA greenlights study on a ‘near total reset’ of cells”.

Life Biosciences, a biotech startup co-founded by Harvard biologist David Sinclair, got the FDA’s permission to begin a clinical study of its gene therapy designed to rewind the clock on dying cells.

Life Bio calls its approach partial epigenetic reprogramming, and its clinical trial will be the first to test the concept in humans. It falls under the broader umbrella of experimental therapies known as cellular rejuvenation, which is a major focus of several well-funded startups backed by tech executives.

Ok, right away, we see the usual made-up meaningless jargon: epigenetics (a narrative rescue device for failure of 97% of genome to “code” for anything) and calling the toxic gene therapy class “cellular rejuvenation”. Of course it is…
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1688
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/the-forg ... ne-history
Polio didn’t disappear the way you think it did.

Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.


But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.

First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.

What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”

Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”

Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.

But it gets worse.

The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”

So what about the virus?

Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”

When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”

Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”

Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.

And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about?
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Oh wee oh

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Oh wee oh »

Oh wee oh poooooooolio

Yes, it was already gone by the time the eugenics Dr. (Salk - go read his eugenics books Survival of the Wisest) came up with the "vaccine".

The whole thing is a joke. We figured out hygiene/sewage. Vax due very little to nothing.

Now they majorly harm. But $$$ yearly is good (for pharma)
Guest

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Guest »

https://curioushumanproductions.substac ... a-molecule
The Kory Scale: A Brilliant Analytical Framework

One of the most original contributions of this book is what Dr. Kory calls the “Kory Scale,” a proposed metric to judge the safety and efficacy of therapies based on the intensity of suppression they receive from the medical establishment. The concept is elegantly simple: the more viciously a cheap, unpatentable therapy is attacked by the FDA, NIH, AMA, media, and government agencies, the more likely it actually works. He calculates the Kory Scale score for ivermectin at roughly 100 to 150 points, while chlorine dioxide scores over 500 points, a staggering indictment of the coordinated persecution this compound and its advocates have endured.
A Spy Novel Hidden Inside a Medical Book

What sets this book apart from most alternative medicine literature is that it genuinely reads like a geopolitical thriller. Dr. Kory’s anonymous source, referred to only as “Count Mondragon,” is an 85-year-old retired applied scientist with high-level security clearances who provides a jaw-dropping account of how chlorine dioxide was known to bioweapons researchers decades before Jim Humble ever set foot in Guyana. The Soviet defector and bioweapons expert Vladimir Pasechnik reportedly described chlorine dioxide in 1985 as “the ultimate antidote to all bioweapons” and was later found dead under deeply suspicious circumstances. His colleague David Kelly, one of the UN’s chief weapons inspectors, was similarly “suicided” after working on chlorine dioxide research. These are not conspiracy theories. Dr. Kory presents them as documented, sourced accounts with sobering implications.
tim
Posts: 1688
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/massiv ... ine-injury
MASSIVE EPIDEMIC OF VACCINE INJURY: Overwhelming Evidence Reaches Washington, D.C.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher presents evidence at the MAHA Institute Round Table on mass casualties linked to childhood vaccines and COVID-19 mRNA injections.
All 13 Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Studies Found the Same Pattern

To determine whether vaccines improve health outcomes, the proper comparison is vaccinated children vs. completely unvaccinated children. There are now 13 studies making this comparison.

All show the same pattern: vaccinated children are significantly sicker across all health outcomes.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1688
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/we-are-th ... -americans
WE ARE THE MAJORITY: 56% of Americans Believe COVID Shots Caused Mass Deaths

The public is waking up—and it cannot be stopped.
Image
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1688
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

This book was published in 1988 and foreshadows much of whats coming out today.

https://archive.org/stream/murder-by-in ... s_djvu.txt
MURDER BY INJECTION

The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America

By EUSTACE MULLINS

1988
Yet one physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee,
of Norfolk, Virginia, has publicly stated, "My honest opinion is that
vaccine is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I
could name. I believe that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold
sores and many other disease conditions are the direct results of
vaccination.
From London comes an alarming observation from a
practitioner of excellent reputation and long experience. Dr. Herbert
Snow, senior surgeon at the Cancer Hospital of London, voiced his
concern, "In recent years many men and women in the prime of life
have dropped dead suddenly, often after attending a feast or a
banquet. I am convinced that some eighty per cent of these deaths
are caused by the inoculation or vaccination they have undergone.
They are well known to cause grave and permanent disease to the
heart. The coroner always hushes it up as 'natural causes.' "
Another practitioner, Dr. W. B. Clarke of Indiana, finds that
"Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with
cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with a
least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer
in an unvaccinated person."

At last, we have the breakthrough for which the American
Cancer Society has been searching, at such great expense, and for so
many years. Dr. Clarke has never seen a case of cancer in an
unvaccinated person. Is not this a lead which should be explored?
With such an impetus, the ACS could once again get the telephone
banks ringing in the fund-raising drives, to initiate positive research
as to the possible connection between vaccination and the incidence
of cancer. Somehow, we suspect that ACS will not follow this lead.
It would also look well etched in stone above the imposing entrance
to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, "I never saw a case
of cancer in an unvaccinated person." However, it is unlikely that
the High Priests of Modern Medicine will be able to give up one of
the Four Commandments. It will be necessary for an outraged public
to bring pressure to bear to abandon the modern ritual of sacrificing
our children to Baal in a five thousand year old ritual called, in its
modem version, "compulsory immunization."
Edward Jenner (1796-1839) "discovered" that cowpox vaccine
would supposedly inoculate persons against the eighteenth century
scourge of smallpox. In fact, smallpox was already on the wane, and
some authorities believe it would have vanished by the end of the
century, due to a number of contributing factors. After the use of
cowpox vaccine became widespread in England, a smallpox
epidemic broke out which killed 22,081 people. The smallpox
epidemics became worse each year that the vaccine was used. In
1872, 44,480 people were killed by it. England finally banned the
vaccine in 1948, despite the fact that it was one of the most widely
heralded "contributions" which that country had made to modem
medicine. This action came after many years of compulsory
vaccination, during which period those who refused to submit to its
dangers were hurried off to jail.

Japan initiated compulsory vaccine in 1872. In 1892, there were
165,774 cases of smallpox there, which resulted in 29,979 deaths.
Japan still enforces compulsory vaccination; however, since it is a
militarily occupied nation, its present government can hardly be
blamed for submitting to the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly.
Germany also instituted compulsory vaccination. In 1939 (this
during the Nazi regime), the diptheria rate increased astronomically
to 150,000 cases. Norway, which never instituted compulsory
vaccination, had only fifty cases during the same period.
Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant
conclusion that the great flu "epidemic" of 1918 was solely
attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in
which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston
Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by
vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were
filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of
the vaccine. The epidemic was called "the Spanish Influenza," a
deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal
its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those
who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In
recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu are called "the
Russian Flu." For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps
because the Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down
the party line.

The perils of vaccination were already known. Plain Talk
magazine notes that "during the Franco-Prussian War, every
German soldier was vaccinated. The result was that 53,288
otherwise healthy men developed smallpox. The death rate was
high."
At the annual ACS Science Writers Seminar, Dr. Robert W.
Simpson, of Rutgers University, warned that "immunization
programs against flu, measles, mumps and polio may actually be
seeding humans with RNA to form proviruses which will then
become latent cells throughout the body . . . they can then become
activated as a variety of diseases including lupus, cancer,
rheumatism and arthritis."

This was a remarkable verification of the earlier warning
delivered by Dr. Herbert Snow of London more than fifty years
earlier. He had observed that the long-term effects of the vaccine,
lodging in the heart or other parts of the body, would eventually
result in fatal damage to the heart. The vaccine becomes a time
bomb in the system, festering as what are known as "slow viruses,"
which may take ten to thirty years to become virulent. When that
time arrives, the victim is felled by a fatal onslaught, often with no
prior warning, whether it is a heart attack or some other disease.
Health Freedom News, in its July/August 1986 issue, noted that
"Vaccine is linked to brain damage. 150 lawsuits pending against
DPT vaccine manufacturers, seeking $1.5 billion damages."
Last edited by tim on Fri Mar 13, 2026 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1688
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ddenly-0f4
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, March 2-9, 2026

Actors Jennifer Corman (C), Corey Parker (C, Will & Grace), Stephen Hibbert, Annabel Schofield (C), Maria O’Brien; TV producers Bob Rosenfarb; blues singer John Hammond; rocker Tommy DeCarlo; & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests