by NoOneImportant » Tue Sep 03, 2013 11:29 pm
Military strikes against Syria, to what end? What is the objective? I see no manner that strategic Obama or U.S. interests are served by any military strike, as they are advertised, in advance, as abbreviated, limited in scope, and without corresponding infantry action. Any abbreviated strike only serves to open hostilities that cannot be controlled.
War is about winning, it's about killing the adversary; it is not about steeling his will against you. War is not about school yard antics - "...we'll show those guys...." It is about removing his ability to carry on hostile actions by killing him, or incarcerating him. The proposed antics in Syria do noting to remove Assad's ability to continue to carry out offensive operations. For example: post any U.S. strike, what is to prevent Assad from dispatching agents world wide to conduct covert terror operations - perhaps to drop commercial airlines at any commercial airport in the world, or perhaps to disable crude oil refineries world wide - both eminently soft targets, of which there are literally hundreds?
There are things larger than self worth the supreme sacrifice of self, Obama's diarrhea of the mouth is not one of them. This is an inept chief executive who can't keep his mouth shut who is way beyond his capability, messing with things that are way beyond his understanding - may God save us all. When merit is reviled, incompetence reigns supreme.
Military strikes against Syria, to what end? What is the objective? I see no manner that strategic Obama or U.S. interests are served by any military strike, as they are advertised, in advance, as abbreviated, limited in scope, and without corresponding infantry action. Any abbreviated strike only serves to open hostilities that cannot be controlled.
War is about winning, it's about killing the adversary; it is not about steeling his will against you. War is not about school yard antics - "...we'll show those guys...." It is about removing his ability to carry on hostile actions by killing him, or incarcerating him. The proposed antics in Syria do noting to remove Assad's ability to continue to carry out offensive operations. For example: post any U.S. strike, what is to prevent Assad from dispatching agents world wide to conduct covert terror operations - perhaps to drop commercial airlines at any commercial airport in the world, or perhaps to disable crude oil refineries world wide - both eminently soft targets, of which there are literally hundreds?
There are things larger than self worth the supreme sacrifice of self, Obama's diarrhea of the mouth is not one of them. This is an inept chief executive who can't keep his mouth shut who is way beyond his capability, messing with things that are way beyond his understanding - may God save us all. When merit is reviled, incompetence reigns supreme.