You seem to be focusing on the event. Who was behind the Kirk assassination, why whoever was behind it wanted him dead. etc. Then you cited two events: The Iraq War, and COVID where you say it's important to understand who was behind it and why (at least that's my interpretation of what you are saying).FullMoon wrote: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:51 pmThere's plenty of people who wanted to silence the man. Not just Leftists. The whole thing is rather a sham if you look into it and the details. And we still don't know really what's going on. Unless you believe the line we're being fed. Hook line and sinker. I remember clearly the WMD hoax nd haven't trusted them since. And how about that COVID. People are falling for the most obvious dupes because it gets their emotions up. They forget how reason clearly and figure out the truth for themselves rather than just believe what they're told to believe.These leftist fools wanted a fight? Like the man said, congratulations, they got one. These fools have given him a free ticket.
Regarding the Kirk assassination, people get murdered every day. The United Health CEO was murdered. The reaction was sort of ho hum. Did Mangione do it? Or was it orchestrated from a different level? Probably doesn't matter too much as the reaction was ho hum.
Sometimes really important people get murdered. JFK, RFK, MLK. Who was behind those matters a lot more. Charlie Kirk? Not so much. He doesn't fit into that category of important player. The United Health CEO? Not so much. Archduke Ferdinand? Not so much.
But what is important in those "not so much" cases is the reaction to the event. That's what I'm solely focusing on. Once Charlie Kirk's wife measured the reaction, she spoke, and what she said was noteworthy. Noteworthy enough that I went to the video and posted it word for word. Also noteworthy was the reaction of the leftists on social media and, maybe more important, the reaction of the right to their reaction. Taken together, these reactions appear to be enough to touch off revenge killings or outright revolution.
Also, what we are seeing is the type of thing that happens in dark ages. I can't say we're far enough along in this dark age that this type of violence becomes predominant (versus nation state versus nation state violence) but I think it's a possibility. I talked about revenge killings early on in this dark age hovel, on page 1 or 2.