Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

[Higgenbotham]

These leftist fools wanted a fight? Like the man said, congratulations, they got one. These fools have given him a free ticket.

There's plenty of people who wanted to silence the man. Not just Leftists. The whole thing is rather a sham if you look into it and the details. And we still don't know really what's going on. Unless you believe the line we're being fed. Hook line and sinker. I remember clearly the WMD hoax nd haven't trusted them since. And how about that COVID. People are falling for the most obvious dupes because it gets their emotions up. They forget how reason clearly and figure out the truth for themselves rather than just believe what they're told to believe.

You seem to be focusing on the event. Who was behind the Kirk assassination, why whoever was behind it wanted him dead. etc. Then you cited two events: The Iraq War, and COVID where you say it's important to understand who was behind it and why (at least that's my interpretation of what you are saying).

Regarding the Kirk assassination, people get murdered every day. The United Health CEO was murdered. The reaction was sort of ho hum. Did Mangione do it? Or was it orchestrated from a different level? Probably doesn't matter too much as the reaction was ho hum.

Sometimes really important people get murdered. JFK, RFK, MLK. Who was behind those matters a lot more. Charlie Kirk? Not so much. He doesn't fit into that category of important player. The United Health CEO? Not so much. Archduke Ferdinand? Not so much.

But what is important in those "not so much" cases is the reaction to the event. That's what I'm solely focusing on. Once Charlie Kirk's wife measured the reaction, she spoke, and what she said was noteworthy. Noteworthy enough that I went to the video and posted it word for word. Also noteworthy was the reaction of the leftists on social media and, maybe more important, the reaction of the right to their reaction. Taken together, these reactions appear to be enough to touch off revenge killings or outright revolution.

Also, what we are seeing is the type of thing that happens in dark ages. I can't say we're far enough along in this dark age that this type of violence becomes predominant (versus nation state versus nation state violence) but I think it's a possibility. I talked about revenge killings early on in this dark age hovel, on page 1 or 2.

[FullMoon]

Taken together, these reactions appear to be enough to touch off revenge killings or outright revolution.

It's definitely a tinder box. And has been for a while. The whole world is on edge and violence is increasing rapidly. We know that and prepare accordingly. But it's not fun or easy to see it falling apart in real time as you as everyone here haa discussed since it seemed a somewhat distant event which is now very close.

[Higgenbotham]

We're used to mostly seeing nation state versus nation state war. The main issue with it is that it's really hard to organize and sustain when the world is on the downslope. They're slugging it out in the Ukraine and every mile is painful. I don't keep up with it very much. Granted, they can let the nukes fly and just see where the dust settles. But I get the feeling that Civil War would be easy at this point. Maybe China really will do something soon. But after doing nothing last year it feels to me like their opportunity slipping away.

[FullMoon]

China is in full war mode but they don't want to use military means because it's too risky. Having us destroy ourselves is much easier. we also know that there's organized groups trying to do NWO stuff and whatnot. But collapse should be swift and remarkably damaging so that everyone ends up with less. Those preparing at whatever level just want to have that they need. We peasants hope for food and water but those pesky domineering types probably want to keep their fortunes somehow.

[tim]

We're used to mostly seeing nation state versus nation state war. The main issue with it is that it's really hard to organize and sustain when the world is on the downslope. They're slugging it out in the Ukraine and every mile is painful. I don't keep up with it very much. Granted, they can let the nukes fly and just see where the dust settles. But I get the feeling that Civil War would be easy at this point. Maybe China really will do something soon. But after doing nothing last year it feels to me like their opportunity slipping away.

I have come to view world events through the lens of China conducting asymmetrical warfare on its enemies. Everything from the mRNA shots, to the social media movements dividing this country, to the fentanyl drug crisis when viewed as weapons of war makes sense to me.

The statistics of all of these are leading to a decrease in China's future enemies. Push global warming theory on your enemies and get your enemies to deindustrialize and thats less future enemy infrastructure that will have to be destroyed in a kinetic war. Push far left ideological ideas on your enemies youth to confuse them, get them unable to understand gender in a time when they are vulnerable and you decrease your future enemy population. For every less child born because of far left ideology whether that be feminism, transgenderism, etc. is one less future enemy soldier that China will have to fight one day. If in the process China was able to instigate a civil war in its enemies homeland, so much the better.

The fentanyl drug crisis is really just China doing to the U.S. what the Western world did to China during the Opium Wars.

https://supersally.substack.com/p/macau ... -latest-vs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrestricted_Warfare

Unrestricted Warfare: Two Air Force Senior Colonels on Scenarios for War and the Operational Art in an Era of Globalization[1] (simplified Chinese: 超限战; traditional Chinese: 超限戰; lit. 'warfare beyond bounds') is a book on military strategy written in 1999 by two colonels in the People's Liberation Army (PLA), Qiao Liang (乔良) and Wang Xiangsui (王湘穗).[2] Its primary concern is how a nation such as China can defeat a technologically superior opponent (such as the United States) through a variety of means.[3] Rather than focusing on direct military confrontation, this book instead examines a variety of other means, such as political warfare.[4][5][6][7] Such means include using legal tools (see lawfare) and economic means as leverage over one's opponent and circumventing the need for direct military action.[8][9][10][11]

[FullMoon]

https://youtube.com/shorts/LZcnmrk3wYs? ... cuQQ703TlY

For anyone who hasn't seen some of Charlie's worthwhile exchanges on his tour.
He was a remarkable person and his works and reasons for death are worth considering. For he seemed to want to live as Christ taught. And because of doing so apparently had a change of heart about his affiliations. He had spoken about his fears of getting killed. I won't mention the name but the guilty are apparently known.

[FullMoon]

I have come to view world events through the lens of China conducting asymmetrical warfare on its enemies.

For sure they're doing as much as they can. But probably so is Russia and everyone else including guess who, yes it's us. They don't have so much money and personnel to do nothing. Undermining the enemy is perhaps very much in their line of work. Both adversaries like to paint themselves as the aggrieved within their own countries. And paint the opposing side as the aggressor. We consider their aggression as disproportionate to our own. And it is but they have much greater stressors towards their existential survival. Ours are more superficial.

[FullMoon]

This is why male fertility is falling. And why young men often look and behave in a more feminine way than their fathers.

https://open.substack.com/pub/drvernonc ... d&r=4d4v0u

Here's a potential explanation for the above contained quote. It can't be ruled out and the issue is still a mystery.

[Higgenbotham]

FullMoon and tim, you are both right in saying that we have been and are at war with China, and it's been going on for a long time. A couple related thoughts that come to mind. We're used to discussing the four horsemen as if they are separate things - war, pestilence, famine, death. What's different now is that governments have the ability to inflict pestilence and famine through deliberate actions rather than nature being the means of unleashing it. So to discuss pestilence and famine or even weather changes as if they are always acts of nature and never acts of war isn't correct. Some people seem to be stuck in the mindset that, for example, the Wuhan virus originated from a bat when it's pretty obvious that it originated from a lab. Also, that China (or any nation state) could inflict a thousand cuts through asymmetric war and, after doing that, try to knock us out through direct war, either conventional or nuclear. Even people who recognized the thousand cuts strategy fully expected direct war. But as decline accelerates and things become more unstable, that might not be necessary, or even possible.

[Higgenbotham]

This is why male fertility is falling. And why young men often look and behave in a more feminine way than their fathers.

https://open.substack.com/pub/drvernonc ... d&r=4d4v0u

Here's a potential explanation for the above contained quote. It can't be ruled out and the issue is still a mystery.

To me, it's not that mysterious, except we don't know what percentage of the problem comes from where. Drug residues might be responsible for 2 percent of testosterone decline or 98 percent, we don't know. I'm exaggerating because it almost certainly has to be much more than 2 and much less than 98. But it's not insignificant. He says drug residues can't be filtered out. Any organic chemical can be removed to below detection limits with the right kind of filter. It was initially thought that there weren't filters that could remove PFAS but it's been shown that there are. The cheap filters can remove some but not enough to be effective. If they are drinking bottled spring water as they say, they should be drinking it out of glass bottles. The micro and nano plastics in plastic bottles might be as bad as the drug residues. There really is no escape, just reduction.