
I sometimes find it hard to see how things could get worse in Washington, but those people never cease to amaze me, and I'm confident they'll find a way to surpass my expectations once again. That's about the only thing they're good at.
Ok. I count a temporary deflation before hyperinflation like the tide going out before a tsunami comes in. To me it is not really a separate phenomenon but part of the hyperinflation process.Higgenbotham wrote: Vince, seriously, this brought something to mind. I posted some information about the Weimar hyperinflation where it said there was a 50% deflation before the hyperinflation. After that, you said that there has never been a deflation in a fiat currency except for Japan, which has had a mild deflation. Also, about a year ago, I posted some information about a 20-30% deflation in England that occurred while England was off the gold standard in the early 1800s, along with links to the Bank of England web site and a book that had a chart of the deflation.
I would. Wording it that way opens up the possibility for the 30% deflation in this crisis period that John has predicted, so I don't see a huge conflict there. I believe that in order to get to hyperinflation quickly, the US would need to see a severe deflation like the one that occurred in Weimar. All fiat currencies have historically led to hyperinflation and you know I've said that's one of the only things I can state with 100% certainty; the only question is when. The US is something like 98 years into that process or, if someone prefers, 78 years or 40 years.vincecate wrote:So let me try to be more precise. I don't think there is any historical double digit deflation that was not part of attempting to return to a gold standard or leading up to hyperinflation. Would you agree with me if I word it this way?
While I agree that there is the possibility of temporary deflation just before the hyperinflation, I am not a short term trader and would never try to time it even if I thought the odds of it happening were much better than I do. If Weimar had maybe a year of deflation the US dollar might only get a few weeks. Maybe what we have right now is as good as it gets for the dollar. I think things will happen far faster this time because information flows far faster now. Hyperinflation is the period after inflation gets to over 5% per month and before the currency is completely destroyed and nobody uses it any more. In Weimar people did not understand what was going on for years. People will not stay so clueless so long this time. This time before we even get to 5% per month the news sources and blogs will be buzzing about hyperinflation trying to explain it, everyone will read up on hyperinflation. As they do they will bail out of the dollar right away. It won't take so many years for the dollar to get destroyed.Higgenbotham wrote:I would. Wording it that way opens up the possibility for the 30% deflation in this crisis period that John has predicted, so I don't see a huge conflict there. I believe that in order to get to hyperinflation quickly, the US would need to see a severe deflation like the one that occurred in Weimar. All fiat currencies have historically led to hyperinflation and you know I've said that's one of the only things I can state with 100% certainty; the only question is when. The US is something like 98 years into that process or, if someone prefers, 78 years or 40 years.vincecate wrote:So let me try to be more precise. I don't think there is any historical double digit deflation that was not part of attempting to return to a gold standard or leading up to hyperinflation. Would you agree with me if I word it this way?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests