No clue on what percentage are even allowed to understand what the reality they are not even allowed to see G. Around here we agree to think about what we can do and watch the narrative unfold on how they cannot fund and still want more of the same. Like we noted correctly half of the numbers are not even supposed to be here but they will keep them voting for them for 200 years. Simple ingrediant for what we trend and others do abuse.
http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/index.shtml
From that link provided it is not that hard to deconstruct the majority of economic papers. I have a friend with a good sense of humor who I directed to a link and I botched the URL so it sent him to a unsavoury site. I laughed and he was nervous but I think He seen the intent was a simple error. Like we noted many cannot even undestand why or how as we are to date. As we are locally we are trying to recover from the locust mentality since business is defined by law and there attack is pure intent and
no accident on what is and ought since we can forward the logic on that topic also. If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, then we do not know how we are helping to implement the vision. When we remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot see out of the box. Hegel's dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship. If you properly discern Sismondi’s Nouveaux principes d’ economie politique you will see influence by both Smith and Rousseau and Marx who included it into his work and the Political reality.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... tic#p18285
As for current investing I look at it as the plague in a few sectors with fleas that carry desease and try to drill down on free cash flow and what the so called analyst screw up on since if you look as a few GOOD Compantys that are walking in a new and better frame of tech and servives. Like I warned some did a warn reboot for many reasons beyond this note. I still think look outside your own front door and keep there feet to the fire since we can give twenty five reasons why they get pissed off and they cannot and will not.
The last five to ten years have been a real #24 on a few topics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.
Bonhoeffer was right on more things than a few will consider and wish I had read him earlier. For the paranoid and deluded it is not about removal of one
but the facts on the many who watched.
Check for youself that modern history teaches beyond question that the biggest danger of unnatural death is democide; death by government.
According to R. J. Rummel, author of Statistics of Democide, between the years 1900 to 1999, at least 262 million people have been killed by governments. This does NOT include people killed in war.
Locally three have been shot. A few days ago four maniancs broke into a home and the home owner defended himself and one was shot while the rest fled.
The other was a veteran and we are still desparately looking for that bad actor. The third was open homocide and I cannot comment on it since a friend new the victom.