Russia demands ALL the Geneva agreement be implemented

[Reality Check]

.
.
On the day after signing an international agreement saying it would not use violence in Ukraine, the Kiev government announced it would use armed force to remove anti-Kiev militias from buildings in eastern Ukraine. http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2525

The Obama administration on the same day, one day after signing a peace agreement with Russia, threatened Russia with immediate new sanctions if Russia does not assist in immediately implementing the portions of the Geneva agreement that Obama believes are most urgent. http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2531

Russia pushed back hard, pointed to the Russian invasion force surrounding Ukraine, and strongly implied that Russia would invade immediately if the U.S. abandoned the Geneva peace agreement and instead implemented new sanctions. http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2529

Kiev government has now apparently backed down, and suspended indefinitely it's "active implementation" of the Anti-Terrorism plan, citing as one of the reasons the Geneva Agreement. http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2530

Russia is now promising, in a more conciliatory statement, to help the Ukrainian people implement those parts of the agreement the Kiev government is responsible for peacefully implementing, but first the U.S., E.U., and Russia must agree on the terms of the OSCE monitoring mission, so Russia will have sufficient military officers on the ground in Ukraine, as OSCE monitors, to allow Russia to assist the Ukrainian people in stabilizing the country. As Russia keeps telling everyone, over and over again, Russia has never claimed to have any presence in Eastern Ukraine that would allow it to influence the anti-Kiev militias that are in control of cities, or portions of cities, in eastern Ukraine. http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2532

Russia is, quite reasonably, from a third party observer stand point, insisting that all the requirements of the Geneva joint statement agreement need to be implemented, not just the ones the United States and the E.U. believe are the most urgent. A deal is a deal. Even if the U.S., E.U., and the Kiev government agreed in writing to a bad deal ( bad from the standpoint of the Kiev government, and the West ).

[Reality Check]

The above post summarizes what has happened in the two days since the Kiev government, Russia, the United States and the European Union signed an agreement in Geneva.

The individual subjects being summarized can be found:

http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2525

http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2531

http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2529

http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2530

http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2532

Russia is, quite reasonably, from a third party observer stand point, insisting that all the requirements of the Geneva joint statement agreement need to be implemented, not just the ones the United States and the E.U. believe are the most urgent. A deal is a deal. Even if the U.S., E.U., and the Kiev government agreed in writing to a bad deal ( bad from the standpoint of the Kiev government, and the West ).