John J. Xenakis wrote:
> But I really think that you can figure it out if you read (or
> reread) this:
>
** The bubble that broke the world
> ** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/cgi ... rett071009
> Take a look at what happened in 1931, and see how the US, Britain
> and France did everything they could to save the German currency.
> At that time, Germany was a debtor nation and the US was a
> creditor nation.
> Now move foward to the present day, and replace 1931 US with
> China today, and 1931 Germany with the US today.
> You'll understand why it's in the interest of China (and Japan
> and Europe and the Mideast) to do everything possible to save the
> dollar. My expectation, as I've said many times, is that China and
> Japan and others will cancel America's debt, for two reasons: (1)
> The strength of their own economies will depend on the strength of
> the American economy; and (2) They'll realize that the debts will
> never be repaid anyway.
> So take a look at The Bubble that Broke the World, and think
> about how it applies to today.
JLak wrote:
> That is quite a statement. Last week an old lady shot herself and
> was relieved of her debt. Will the world community be so
> understanding of Uncle Sam's affliction?
The world community will not be particularly understanding; they'll
mostly be extremely contemptuous and hate-filled, and this will
lead to a world war.
In the meantime, however, countries around the world will take any
desperate measure they can to keep the world from sliding further and
further into total chaos.
One of the totally desperate measures that was taken in 1931 was to
forgive Germany's debt, and my expectation is that some similar
totally desperate measure will be taken today.
JLak wrote:
> Also, why are you picking 1931 Germany? At that point the currency
> was on a gold standard. Admittedly, I don't know of the history
> that you mention (US, FR and GB trying to save the currency).
This "gold standard" concept is TOTALLY MEANINGLESS. It makes no
sense whatsoever. It makes no more sense to talk about a "gold
standard" then it would to talk about a "chrysanthemum standard" or a
"water standard."
Money today is not created by printing presses. The whole concept of
"printing money" is also TOTALLY MEANINGLESS. Money today is created
through debt. If you borrow $1000 from a bank, then you've created
$1000, because you have $1000 in your pocket, and the bank has $1000
in assets on its books.
Nobody ran any printing presses to create the current bubble. The
creation of worthless mortgage-backed securities, credit default
swaps, and other credit derivatives added hundreds of trillions of
dollars to the world, without a single dollar bill being printed.
As the credit bubble bursts, and the world heads into a massive
deflationary spiral, all those hundreds of trillions of dollars are
disappearing, without a single dollar bill being burned in an
incinerator.
Exactly the same thing happened in the 1920s, though to a much
smaller extent. Stocks were purchased on margin, investment trusts
were early forms of hedge funds, and there was a big real estate
bubble, all of which created huge amounts of money without a single
dollar bill being printed, even though there was theoretically a
"gold standard." The crash reversed all that, as is happening now.
The "gold standard" concept may have made sense centuries ago, but
in the last century it's had no meaning whatsoever.
malleni wrote:
> So please, if we trying to find a connection between that Germany
> and today USA - it can be only on facts. 1. - The one of these
> facts is that both countries had (US still have) - huge
> (disproportional) military complex, with military industries and
> expense. 2. - Germany, lose the war and was not allowed to rebuild
> this industry, and on the another side Germany was in lack of
> money. - US does not lose a big war, but losing at least two
> smaller one and military industry (if it is not outsourced) - has
> no money since the state has no money.
This is fatuous political nonsense which is also completely
irrelevant in every possible way. You're focusing on tiny political
details which are irrelevant to the big picture -- namely that in
1931 the entire world was sliding into chaos, just as is happening
today.
And when the world is sliding into chaos, the political details and
bickering are put aside, and desperate measures are taken, and that's
what's happening today, and will happen more and more in the next
year.
Sincerely,
John
John J. Xenakis
E-mail:
john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site:
http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum:
http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com/forum