3-May-18 World View -- Israel reveals intelligence coup on Iran's nuclear weapons program

[Trevor]

Yeah, I remember how many people who are now screaming it was the greatest mistake in the history of humanity were pushing for an invasion back in 2002. Certainly it wasn't universal, but it was the majority.

Worst case scenario is that Iran would have a nuclear weapon right now. And once they built one, the other Middle Eastern powers would soon follow.

John, would you expect the war to begin with nuclear weapons or would you expect them to be used a bit later, likely by whoever is losing the fight?

[Guest]

This just proves once again how evil Israel is. Israel has a long history of such things: like bombing innocent civilians in Syria or kidnapping members of other countries' militaries or firebombing other countries embassies. Decent countries like Iran would NEVER do such things.

And now Israel is admitting to breaking and entering, burglary, theft, and espionage -- all on Iran's sovereign territory! Just criminal, absolutely criminal. And all of these horrendous crimes for what? Some measly nuclear weapons that never did anyone any harm? This is WAY our of proportion.

Wasn't it Iran that held those American soldiers hostage during the Carter days.

[John]

> Yeah, I remember how many people who are now screaming it was the
> greatest mistake in the history of humanity were pushing for an
> invasion back in 2002. Certainly it wasn't universal, but it was
> the majority.

That's true. I'll bet Shoshin was leading the pack demanding war
against Saddam.

> Worst case scenario is that Iran would have a nuclear weapon right
> now. And once they built one, the other Middle Eastern powers
> would soon follow.

> John, would you expect the war to begin with nuclear weapons or
> would you expect them to be used a bit later, likely by whoever is
> losing the fight?

There are lots of scenarios. It might be a "Pearl Harbor" type
attack with nuclear weapons. Or it might be a ground war in
Kashmir that gradually builds until one side or the other decides
to use a tactical nuclear weapon.

[Guest]

There are lots of scenarios. It might be a "Pearl Harbor" type
attack with nuclear weapons. Or it might be a ground war in
Kashmir that gradually builds until one side or the other decides
to use a tactical nuclear weapon.

I think the type of attack is different in different eras.
In an awakening era, I would expect that attacks would have limited scope with an immediate goal in mind.
In an unravelling era, I would expect gradual escalation would be more common.
I would expect that a full unreserved assault beginning with nuclear weapons, would be more common in a crisis era.

[John]

> Interesting though disappointing comments. Having been a Military
> Case Worker during Gulf 1, I witnessed yet another American
> globalist unfinished war. We peasants eternally pay for those and
> the ensuing Marshal Plans. Despite his pretense, Saddam
> understood and spoke English quite well. He confided to his
> pre-hanging American physician that he regretted nothing but being
> caught. To believe that Iranian leaders were and are less
> psychopathic is foolishness. Criticism of Israel is ludicrous as
> they have now surpassed any nation in education, innovation,
> military strategy, leadership and raw courage. I doubt John's
> post will make Breibart, and that is a loss to us all. Bravo,
> John, and a braced salute.

You're right that they refused to post this article on Breitbart.
This is the third time my article was censored in the last month or
so. To fight this kind of censorship is one of the reasons why Andrew
Breitbart started the web site in the first place.