Financial topics

Investments, gold, currencies, surviving after a financial meltdown
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Financial topics

Post by John »

Dear Higgie,
Higgenbotham wrote: > The Gallup daily spending patterns for November show reversion
> back to the lower levels earlier this year among high income
> earners. Lots of interesting graphs.

> http://www.gallup.com/poll/124634/Upper ... ormal.aspx
So as I understand it, retailers are claiming that sales increased in
November, but according to the Discover study and the Gallup survey,
people are reporting that they're spending 15-20% less.

So what the hell is going on? Are the retailers lying?

John
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

That had to be what Citigroup, with its firsthand expertise with bailouts, must have been thinking when it lent $8 billion to Dubai last year. Oh, and here’s an interesting fact: Citigroup made the loan to Dubai on Dec. 14, 2008. Take a look at the calendar — that’s after it received tens of billions in TARP funds. Citigroup’s chairman, Win Bischoff, said at the time, “This is in line with our commitment to the U.A.E. market in general, and reflects our positive outlook on Dubai in particular.” Good call.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/busin ... odayspaper

Now I'm starting to get angry! Where is the oversight? Bailout money goes down the rathole in Dubai. Where does this end?
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

John wrote:Dear Higgie,
Higgenbotham wrote: > The Gallup daily spending patterns for November show reversion
> back to the lower levels earlier this year among high income
> earners. Lots of interesting graphs.

> http://www.gallup.com/poll/124634/Upper ... ormal.aspx
So as I understand it, retailers are claiming that sales increased in
November, but according to the Discover study and the Gallup survey,
people are reporting that they're spending 15-20% less.

So what the hell is going on? Are the retailers lying?

John
Here are the additional items I read earlier this week that made the government's number seem doubtful.

Discover Card did a Christmas spending survey and the results show that consumers intend to spend an average 15% less this year:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/12/ ... ll-15.html
Apparently, this survey was suppressed in the media.

Next, I saw on CNET that unit sales of electronic equipment were up this season, but revenue was down due to price cuts:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-10412 ... 7-1_3-0-20
However, I have not seen similar data for overall retail sales for the week of Black Friday.

And it seems I read earlier that anecdotal reports indicated Black Friday retail sales were slow as indicated by a number of department store retailers, but the following Monday's Internet sales were pretty good.

A few reports have indicated the over half of the purported 1.3% increase in retail sales reported by the Commerce Department was due to an increase in gasoline sales. The Commerce Department changed how the survey was done last month, but the mainstream seems to be accepting the figure at face value.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Financial topics

Post by John »

Dear Higgie,
Higgenbotham wrote:
That had to be what Citigroup, with
its firsthand expertise with bailouts, must have been thinking
when it lent $8 billion to Dubai last year. Oh, and here’s an
interesting fact: Citigroup made the loan to Dubai on Dec. 14,
2008. Take a look at the calendar — that’s after it received tens
of billions in TARP funds. Citigroup’s chairman, Win Bischoff,
said at the time, “This is in line with our commitment to the
U.A.E. market in general, and reflects our positive outlook on
Dubai in particular.” Good call.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/busin ... odayspaper

Now I'm starting to get angry! Where is the oversight? Bailout
money goes down the rathole in Dubai. Where does this
end?
Not sure why you're just getting angry now -- I've been furious and
disgusted for a long time. And the end is nowhere in sight.

I've referred to the Dubai development as the most extravagant real
estate project since the ancient Pyramids.

I wonder how many Pharoahs went bankrupt building the Pyramids? There
were tens of thousands of laborers, who all had to be housed and fed.
Many of the laborers would have to have been "borrowed" from other
regions of Egypt, and so there were enormous prices that had to be
paid in one way or another. With all those huge amounts of resources
sloshing around, the level of corruption must have been enormous. I
wonder if some kind of ancient credit bubble was created by the Nomad
generation of the time, possibly involving some kind of ancient
securities market. I wonder what happened when the market crashed?

Or maybe the Pyramids were built by Martians. Gerald?
http://www.outerworlds.com/likeness/aliens/aliens.html

John
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

Very realistic and up to date summary here:

http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/bu ... t=&sid=101
Recent efforts to gauge activity have been mixed. The Commerce Department said yesterday that retail sales rose 1.3 percent in November, a report that was contradicted by ShopperTrak, which said retail sales slipped 0.1 percent for the month. Additionally, ShopperTrak said retail sales for the week ending Dec. 5 fell 0.3 percent compared with the same period last year.
These estimates from ShopperTrak seem consistent with what I'd been reading prior to the release of the (phony) government report. When will the lies stop? Yes, I am angry!

Well, my overall conclusion as of now is that the herd can ignore the facts for another week and drive the market to new highs. I'd guess the odds are 50/50. The Dubai and associated problems can be put on the back burner until after the December 21 meeting, the rise in the dollar can be ignored for awhile longer if it doesn't shoot much higher from here, 30 year bonds haven't broken down to the downside quite yet, and the herd seems quite insistent that retail sales are fine and there is no reason to think that delusion will be shattered before Christmas is over and the facts are immutable.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

A couple charts I drew tonight. They show that the market is at a critical juncture.

First chart is long term and shows the stock market has broken out above a large descending wedge pattern which apexed in October, yet remains inside of a smaller ascending wedge pattern which seems due to resolve very soon. Second chart shows the smaller ascending wedge pattern in detail along with the broken uptrend line (not shown on the long term chart) and the lower boundary of the wedge.

http://i49.tinypic.com/s3244w.gif
http://i48.tinypic.com/dgoqwz.gif
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

John wrote:Dear Higgie,
Higgenbotham wrote:
That had to be what Citigroup, with
its firsthand expertise with bailouts, must have been thinking
when it lent $8 billion to Dubai last year. Oh, and here’s an
interesting fact: Citigroup made the loan to Dubai on Dec. 14,
2008. Take a look at the calendar — that’s after it received tens
of billions in TARP funds. Citigroup’s chairman, Win Bischoff,
said at the time, “This is in line with our commitment to the
U.A.E. market in general, and reflects our positive outlook on
Dubai in particular.” Good call.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/busin ... odayspaper

Now I'm starting to get angry! Where is the oversight? Bailout
money goes down the rathole in Dubai. Where does this
end?
Not sure why you're just getting angry now -- I've been furious and
disgusted for a long time. And the end is nowhere in sight.

John
John, it's one thing for a crooked operation like Citibank to take the money of those who voluntarily give it to them, play around with it, and then reach the point of implosion. But it's quite another once the implosion point is reached for politicians and bureaucrats to give them another chance by taking money from those who would not give it voluntarily and then (here is the worst part) do nothing while Citibank then throws that money into a black hole like Dubai. Granted, we all have our level of tolerance, but this crew of idiots has got to be taken away from the levers before they destroy Western Civilization and we go into Dark Age II. After reading this, I'm pretty well convinced none of this other nonsense I'm talking about really matters and that is where we are headed. As you like to say, with absolute certainty.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
thrive
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:33 am

Re: Bears

Post by thrive »

John wrote:Dear Higgie,

We are in a deflationary spiral, and it is 100% certain that there
will be a major correction -- probably 30-40% to begin and then,
following the 1929-32 pattern, a further plunge to Dow 1500 or so over
the next few years. The shock will be much greater than it would have
been if the crash had been allowed to happen earlier.

John
Hi, John -

It would be interesting to hear your feedback and that of others here on the forum about Charles Nenner's comments on CNBC.

http://charlesnenner.com

If you go to Nenner's Sept 9, 2009 video clip you can see his latest thoughts on future market performance.

Nenner charts the current markets side by side with the markets of the 1930s, with the premise (as I see it) that the timing of peaks and valleys are similar.

For over a year I've been visiting GenerationalDynamics.com and this forum -- I appreciate the many insights.
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

Greenspan's comments this morning on Meet the Press. More comments from him at the link. I was actually shocked to see "Easy Al " basically say it's time to withdraw the stimulus. It wouldn't surprise me to see the stock market down tomorrow on these comments.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34380027/ns ... ss/page/5/
MR. GREGORY: Let me turn to another question about the role of government, and that is the role of the Federal Reserve. Dr. Greenspan, Paul Krugman, liberal economic economist for The New York Times columnist, wrote this this week about what the Fed ought to do: "There's also," he wrote, "I believe, a question of priorities. The Fed sprang into action when faced with the prospect of wrecked banks; it doesn't seem equally concerned about the prospect of wrecked lives. And that is what we're talking about here. The kind of sustained high unemployment envisaged in the Fed's own forecast is a recipe for immense human suffering--millions of families losing their savings and their homes, millions of young Americans never getting their working lives properly started because there are no jobs available when they graduate. If we don't get unemployment down soon, we'll be paying a price for a generation." Does the Fed have more to do?

DR. GREENSPAN: I think the Fed has done an extraordinary job, and it's done a huge amount. There's just so much monetary policy and the central bank can do, and I think they've gone to their limits at this particular stage. And you cannot ask them to create more than is physically possible. They, they stopped what essentially was a major financial collapse by interposing sovereign credit for private credit for commercial paper, for essentially blocking a number of problems which emerged especially, incidentally, in conjunction with the Treasury, the so-called TARP program, where they put capital into banks.

MR. GREGORY: Mm-hmm.

DR. GREENSPAN: I thought at that point was essential. The difficulty is there is a limit. And if the Federal Reserve does not, in fact, pull in all of the stimulus it's put into the economy, then down the road is inflation. It's a long way down the road and it's not immediate. But the question is, you cannot ask a, a central bank to do more than it is capable of doing without very dire consequences.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Bears

Post by Higgenbotham »

thrive wrote:Hi, John -

It would be interesting to hear your feedback and that of others here on the forum about Charles Nenner's comments on CNBC.

http://charlesnenner.com

If you go to Nenner's Sept 9, 2009 video clip you can see his latest thoughts on future market performance.

Nenner charts the current markets side by side with the markets of the 1930s, with the premise (as I see it) that the timing of peaks and valleys are similar.
The clip from September 9 is on youtube and it was interesting. He showed a comparison with the 1938 Dow, then showed his Nenner Cycle. The Nenner Cycle projected a high in the market in October and the 1938 comparison projected a high in December. Since my August projection was blown out, I've been thinking December but it's sure been bumpy. I had thought the December 3 reversal was the end of it, but the market is still at about the midpoint of where it traded that day. If we are to believe this is still a bear market rally and believe in charting, this chart I posted yesterday would seem to confirm the view that the market has either made its last gasp or is about to. As late as early September, I could never have imagined a scenario where it would have gotten to this point.

http://i49.tinypic.com/s3244w.gif

Today I also found some September comments from another prominent bear, Bob Janjuan from the Royal Bank of Scotland, who offered the opinion that further stimulus will be counterproductive (if I remember right, his stated price target in those September notes for the end of this rally was 1100-1120). That appears (the comment about the stimulus) to be essentially what Greenspan said this morning.
Last edited by Higgenbotham on Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests