Generational Dynamics World View News

[CH86]

On a separate note what is Xenakis and others on this forum's opinion on the crisis in Venezuela? Venezuela left the OAS the other day and, Russia, China and Iran are making noise about it at the UN?

[Cynic Hero 86]

Finally most of the posters here are overestimating both China and Russia's capabilities. A china war would take the form of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan because that is the only option that is currently feasible to them. China currently has no ability to defeat the US IN THE US. Regarding the Nuclear option the US still has a 5 to 1 superiority in strategic nukes vs China. Regarding Russia deploying in Venezuela, this is just a bluff if Russia was unwilling to go to full scale war over Ukraine which directly borders Russia they would not go to war over Venezuela which is in America's security zone and nowhere near the Russian sphere of influence. Not only that but Russia has no official treaty with Venezuela either neither does china: and before anyone mentions a direct clash that reportedly has already occurred in Syria when several hundred Russian mercenaries were reportedly wiped out attacking an allied position.

Both China and Russia DO want to drive out US influence out of their near abroads via military conquest if possible. As in any war there is the possibility of defeat, but a worst case scenario here (if we lose) is the US being forced out of eastern Europe, Southeast Asia and the western pacific, not foreign annexation of the US.

[Cynic Hero 86]

John,

Here is an article which supports your theory that China is one day going to use backdoor technology to attack the U.S.

https://arstechnica.com/information-tec ... o-hackers/

China can use huawei to attack countries, but they won't use them to attack the US because the US does not use Huawei tech. John says that China would use Huawei tech as a weapon but how is that a danger to the United states when the United States does not use Huawei manufactured products and is hostile to Huawei being allowed to do business in the US. Huawei backdoors even if John is right about them wouldn't be used against the west because Most western countries aren't using Huawei made systems. The opportunity to use them just isn't there against western countries. Such backdoors would be far more useful against third world and Asian countries that import them because their relative cheapness compared to western made products.

[Xeraphim1]

** 11-Apr-2019 Regeneracy

One thing that I agree with in the preceding comments is that
separatists such as "Aztlán separatist" Mexicans in southwestern US
may take advantage of the war to try to form a separate Aztec-based or
Mexican-based nation.

Possibly, but the attempt would be squashed ruthlessly. During an existential war niceties like due process would be dispensed with.

[John]

** 11-Apr-2019 Japan casus belli

> Without Taiwan, there is no Casus Belli between china and
> america. The main reason the US and China are enemies is because
> of the dispute over the Taiwan issue. Without it relations would
> be much better.

As I've researched and described in detail in my book, the crucible
of the coming war is the mutual hatred of the Chinese and Japanese
people for each other. At the same time, China will be invading
Taiwan, and China will be at war with America because America
will be defending Japan and Taiwan.

[John]

** 11-Apr-2019 World View: War by China against Japan and Taiwan

I've rewritten sections of my book's introductory section to
make it much more explicity clear that China is planning war
with both Japan and Taiwan.

The following text is from my book:

The 20th century was not unique. In every century for millennia,
there have been massive wars on every continent in every region, such
as China's Taiping rebellion, Africa's Mfecane, India's sepoy
rebellion, the 30 years war, the 100 years war, the Punic wars in
ancient Rome, and so forth.

It's 100% certain that there will be massive wars, including one or
two world wars in this century. So the world war with China that this
book is about is actually quite likely. The only thing that can't be
predicted is the exact timing or the precise scenario. But there
will be a world war pitting America and China against each other.

However, my research also reveals that the Chinese have no desire for
war against America. For the most part, the Chinese actually like
Americans -- as well they should -- and have no desire for war.

But my research has also revealed that the Chinese have a vitriolic
hatred for the Japanese, and are thirsting for a war in revenge for
the atrocities committed by the Japanese during World War II.

The Chinese government -- though not the Chinese people as far as I
can tell -- is also thirsting for a war to invade Taiwan and annex it
by force to China.

And China's government are well aware that a war with Japan and Taiwan
will mean war with America, since America will defend Japan and
Taiwan. That's where the world is headed.

It's a cruel irony of the current situation that American and Chinese
people greatly like other, but are going to war anyway because China's
incompetent government is determined to go to war with Japan and
Taiwan.

[FishbellykanakaDude]

The United States will not unify on a grand scale, if and when ...

Gotta love them racists! <chuckle!>

You are completely out of touch with ...

You hate them. They hate you. The rest of us hate you all, because you're the same scum in different shades.

Please do keep up your reputation by continuing to blither and spew. We appreciate your self-destruction immensely.

Thanks again!

[FishbellykanakaDude]

America is overrun with third world barbarians. American is not a sleeping giant; it's sliding into a coma.

If you think immigration is the main reason for America's woes, you are completely uneducated about what immigrants are really like. Although, I do concede that illegal immigration is very bad for the US, and that immigration is the main problem hurting Western Europe.

In the US, most legal immigrants are hard-working and industrious. I've noticed that most of the best research professors are immigrants from China or Europe. Most of the best students are immigrants from China or India, or they're children of immigrants from those countries.

As a Gen Z (Gen Zer?) I think the biggest problem in the US is the moral decay of the youth.

(My opinion, of course!):
A large part of a groups MORALITY is their EXPERIENCE, and that experience is a product of their "parents" (elders) WISDOM in imparting that/their wisdom to their children.

Gen-Zers are a severely unwise, and therefore inexperienced, and therefore "immoral", group of people. They are that way because of the arguably even more unwise group we know of as their parents.

Everywhere I look, I see that personal and social morals have diminished. As morals diminish, so does the regard for the rights of others. I believe this is why the youth is turning to socialism; it is an immoral system that does not respect the rights of the individual.

Still, at least they're willing to fight for something. I could see them unifying against a common enemy. All hope is not lost!

The "cure" to unwise immorality is experience of reality, and it doesn't get much more real than nukes.

The "regeneracy" will be fast and fierce, and the manpower behind it will be the suddenly "experienced" youth.

They still won't be as wise as they need to be to resist the overextension-of-force into genocidal behavior, but that wisdom will come AFTER the genocide, and that is the alchemy transmuting their "lead (Pb) bullet" generation into the "golden (Au) heroes" that will try to hold off the next round of the cycle of genocide.

..they won't be successful, but hey, let's see what happens. Maybe it'll be something "weird"...

[CH86]

Fishdude You're problem is that everyone younger than boomers HATES the boomer morality, they DESPISE it. The boomers like xenakis claiming that the US will wage a "restrained" total war like we did in WW2 is wishful thinking. The scenario of a "restrained" total war where the total war objective is the destruction the of the Chinese or Russian regime but not the Nations themselves (although we might use carpet bombing against civilians potentially in order to break down the enemy regime) with a democratic government being established with no lineage to the wartime government in the enemy nations after the war which Xenakis states as somehow being the certain outcome is nonsense. Thousands of wars have been fought between Nations, hundreds in not thousands of those war being crisis war yet Xenakis only uses the outcome of WW2 as his guide. LOL, He cites the one outcome out of hundreds of potential outcomes that allows boomers "human right-ism" to remain the dominant belief system in the west, as being inevitable.

Not only that what I had stated in the above paragraph, but this is contradicted by the existing doctrines of the Major nuclear powers. US nuclear doctrine has always been a massive "nation-destroying" retaliatory strike in the event of an enemy nuclear attack, although the specific option whether we are to strike first or wait for the enemy to launch first tends to shift depending on what administration is in Power, but the US doctrine in both potential scenarios has always been the same; a Massive retaliatory "nation-destroying" strike on the aggressor nation, this has been the case since the 1950s. Your scenario of the US using mainly tactical nukes against china or Russia primarily against regime targets even when the other side used strategic nukes first could never happen because such directly contradicts 70 years of US doctrine on these matters.

[John]

> The boomers like xenakis claiming that the US will wage a
> "restrained" total war like we did in WW2 is wishful
> thinking.

As usual, what you've written is total gibberish.