I actually agree with the inevitable break up of various countries. Most countries of the world, in fact, will break up into more representative "new countries", in my opinion.eeee wrote:Italy will only survive if it breaks up. Parts of the country are already lost.Not all of Western Europe, the UK, France and Germany might be suicidal but Italy via Salvini is showing a will to survive and tell the Camp of the Saints "You Shall Not Pass!".
I think devolution is the wave of the future. Countries are going to break up and the migrants will live in urban slums and the whites with a backbone will start new countries. Look at the Northern League and the moves for Venetian independence. Also, Spain is breaking apart too. Succession is the only hope.
But it wont happen until AFTER the crisis war AFTER the next crisis war. In other words, not until approximately 4 or 5 generations from now, which would be about 22x4.5=99 years from now (plus-or-minus 16.5 years [(22/2)+(11/2)]),.. so somewhere around 2102 to 2134.
People who "look forward to" these things REALLY hate to hear that.
But that's the way it'll turn out (with minor exceptions) because the next crisis war will usher in the era of the "surveillance state", some states will choose a positive way and most will choose a negative way. The crisis war after that (which I think will be the last crisis war per se) will usher in the era of the "always remembering" state, where there will still be ubiquitous surveillance of the masses, but those "governing" will also be ubiquitously surveilled by "the masses".
In these states (which will be veritably every state) the "masses" will, via "their lifestyle" (entertainment/educational life), be constantly "reminded" (exactly as if it was "their living memory") of the atrocities of ALL past crisis wars so that they (all generations alive) will behave as if they are members of the "post war world rebuilders", such that they will do their damnedest to "counter" the "urge to genocide".
We first have to learn (as a species, as it were) how to handle "ubiquitous surveillance" in a positive humane way, then we have to learn how to build systems that imbue all people with both "benign nationalism" and "utter disgust with genocidal war" via a governmental mechanism that is utterly "open source" and "controlled for humanity (as opposed to controlling humanity)".
How to do that? Beats the crap outta me, but that's what's gotta happen, or we just keep spinning around this genocidal cycle until we do learn.
I'm probably many generational 4-generation cycles away from reality in my "prediction", as I'm a ludicrously optimistic person, but being two cycles out is the minimum time frame as I see it. We're obviously not going to solve this problem after the next rebuild, as we have a HUGE hurdle just figuring out how to deal with "machines" (the technology of surveillance and communication) as tools of government, which will consume at least one cycle.
And it IS likely that a few states (nations) will break up into more sensible "population collections", but most "attempted breakups" will be the "experimental labs" from which we learn how mostly NOT to do "mechanized surveillance and control of population". Most of these "experiments" will use brutal repression, which is what will fuel the next genocidal war cycle.
But I'll be long dead, and I'm sensible enough to realize and accept that "saving mankind" is not my job, and must be handled by generations to come in ways that will be truly fascinating,.. and which I won't witness.
I'm hopeful that our offspring will wise up. That's the best I can do. Terribly sorry if that's not good enough for you.
...good luck, my young and vibrant nephews and nieces and your nephews and nieces in turn,.. do whatcha gotta do, but if you know about "The Cycle" you also know you need to do a few things differently than your less wise ancestors.
Aloha gangies!
<shaka nui!>
Wrong.
