Financial topics

[Higgenbotham]

If there's a runaway down day probably I will peck out a piece on the short side and step aside, then bottom fish small at the usual dead cat bounce locations. If I'd been building capital the past 2 years probably I would take a longer term swing at the short side because I think we're close. It's going to be months to the top at the most in my opinion, not years (provided the top was not last week, of course).

[aeden]

https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com ... 0-billion/

We opened a few energy positions. Very modest from the poker chips on daily sweeps as you know well H.

Remember when Trump wrote the order that those who sell out their stocks (short selling) cannot buy back in later?
There was a reason he did this. Now you are seeing why he did it in real time. d

Emg Utica Offshore Co-Investment Lp
Pembina Pipeline Corp
Enbridge Inc
Williams Companies Inc
Enterprise Products Partners LP
Keyera Corp
Plains GP Holdings LP Class A
NextEra Energy Partners LP
TC Energy Corp
Equitrans Midstream Corp

[Cool Breeze]

If I could follow your posts, perhaps I'd respond. Maybe that's mission accomplished for you, but do take note that either your layout, thoughts, or style there is scatterbrained to say the least. I wish you the best, always.

Go buy a mutual fund your simply lost.

You clearly haven't read my posts. Ask others if they can follow your stream of consciousness, Oracle.

It's quite amusing, though, I will say.

[Cool Breeze]

If there's a runaway down day probably I will peck out a piece on the short side and step aside, then bottom fish small at the usual dead cat bounce locations. If I'd been building capital the past 2 years probably I would take a longer term swing at the short side because I think we're close. It's going to be months to the top at the most in my opinion, not years (provided the top was not last week, of course).

I agree with this, the markets are showing how tenuous they are with all the derivative action exposing the illiquidity of everything (see Van Metre once again).

Saylor is an MIT guy, but he must be stupid like me, since he's in BTC towards a billion.

[Higgenbotham]

WH Ignores Question About Yellen Taking $800k In Speaking Fees From Firm That Bailed Out Loser Hedge Fund In Gamestop Affair

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date January 28, 2021

White House press secretary Jen Psaki avoided answering a question during Thursday's briefing about whether newly confirmed Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen should recuse herself from advising the president on issues related to the developing Gamestop/Robinhood/Reddit stock trading scandal.

Citadel, the firm that bailed out the first hedge fund to be bankrupted by the crowd-sourced stock-buying bonanza this week, has paid Yellen more than $800,000 in speaking fees in recent years.

After it was reported that Yellen was on the phone all day Wednesday talking to key players involved in all aspects of the scandal, most commercial trading platforms stopped the buying of more stocks involved in the ruckus on Thursday morning.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... tadel.html

I believe most of my trading volume is sold to Citadel. I need Citadel sometimes because when I want to dump a position "right now" Citadel is there to take the other side of the trade. Citadel takes risk off my hands that I don't want.

[Higgenbotham]

If there's a runaway down day probably I will peck out a piece on the short side and step aside, then bottom fish small at the usual dead cat bounce locations. If I'd been building capital the past 2 years probably I would take a longer term swing at the short side because I think we're close. It's going to be months to the top at the most in my opinion, not years (provided the top was not last week, of course).

I agree with this, the markets are showing how tenuous they are with all the derivative action exposing the illiquidity of everything (see Van Metre once again).

Saylor is an MIT guy, but he must be stupid like me, since he's in BTC towards a billion.

So Saylor is an MIT guy. I got accepted to CalTech for graduate school. Would you like to see the letter?

And I just read that Stanford is the most selective school in the US. I was accepted there for graduate school too, if you'd like to see that letter. I actually thought the most selective school was CalTech.

Top 100 - Lowest Acceptance Rates

Many students aim for admission to a prestigious college or university, but the supply of open seats often does not meet the demand from applicants. Earning admission to the schools on this list can be especially difficult. With the lowest acceptance rates among all undergraduate institutions that U.S. News surveyed, regardless of ranking category, the 100 colleges and universities listed here are among the most selective, based on the fall 2019 entering class.

SCHOOL LOCATION FALL 2019 ACCEPTANCE RATE
Stanford University Stanford, CA 4%
Columbia University New York, NY 5%
Curtis Institute of Music Philadelphia, PA 5%
Harvard University Cambridge, MA 5%
California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 6%
Princeton University Princeton, NJ 6%
University of Chicago Chicago, IL 6%
Yale University New Haven, CT 6%
Alice Lloyd College Pippa Passes, KY 7%
Brown University Providence, RI 7%
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 7%

I also got accepted to Princeton if you'd like to see that letter.

I didn't apply to MIT. I never really cared for their approach to engineering.

By the way, John graduated from MIT and he's not in bitcoin.

Any more shit you want to try to throw at the wall?

[Higgenbotham]

If I could follow your posts, perhaps I'd respond. Maybe that's mission accomplished for you, but do take note that either your layout, thoughts, or style there is scatterbrained to say the least. I wish you the best, always.

Go buy a mutual fund your simply lost.

You clearly haven't read my posts. Ask others if they can follow your stream of consciousness, Oracle.

It's quite amusing, though, I will say.

We simply pointed out recently at the end of the day do not leave it on the table.
We simply pointed out recently at the end of the day do not leave it to children controlled by demons with flashlights
who we knew used unix with a hairpin code and we knew a proper tally to accountability was impossible in this hour.
We simply pointed to a letter and the book also.

Translation: we were catastrophically wrong about everything, so after you are done calculating your losses for listening to us and shorting the 30Y, here are all our reports on the topic which, you guessed it, were dead wrong too.
You can use them for kindling in case you can't afford to heat your house next winter.

Actually, I got a kick out of this. It's genius.

[John]

** 30-Jan-2021 World View: Stock Market Crash to begin on February 5

Here's an article predicting that the stock market crash
will begin next week, on Friday, February 5:

> "Markowski: S&P At 3rd Perilous High Since 1871

> Recently concluded research of 150 years of empirical data
> revealed that 1929 and 2000 were the first-ever perilous highs for
> the S&P 500 since its inception. The research findings also led to
> the development of the Extreme Analytics (EA) algorithm which
> identifies perilous highs for stock markets and indices. The Bull
> Vix, another algorithm that identifies Bullish Sentiment Anomalies
> (BSA), which has been integrated into the EA, is projecting a
> double-digit correction to begin by February 5, 2021. The Bull
> Vix is projecting that Subsequent to the double-digit correction,
> the S&P 500 will fail to recover back to new highs and will
> instead decline 50% to 80% by 2023."

> https://realinvestmentadvice.com/markow ... ince-1871/

The prediction is based on P/E ratios:

• Price Earnings ratios, 1871 to 2021

He used an algorithm he developed to arrive at the February 5 date.
We'll see.

However, just looking at his graph above seems to imply that the P/E
ratio still has a way to go.

[aeden]

Spain - currency problems - April window maybe March. T
We stick to the it will be evident by April. Caution since no one really knows.
No we are not in control and everyone knows this but the demsheviks.
The rest we do not know as timing into Ezekiel's format upcoming.

[Cool Breeze]

I don't appeal to credentials, I only mentioned Saylor as MIT because John was.

I have as high of credentials as anyone, but I don't need to post them.

aeden says I need to buy a mutual fund

which made me wonder if he could read