Financial topics

[aeden]

As far as long term bears, they don't exist anymore so we can't read their opinions.

True as I watched a podcast from the Islands so we are on to not worried about the Gartman and Dent indicators
and no we are picking on any indicator.
I thought of that in a back corner as the critics thought April that slipped into June from the podcast I took the time
to listen to from Stansbury with Dent collapse early in the rear as the today retards use rule 5 like the plucked Stalin's chickens
as we try to form a view from history some are unaware. The point H is we lost more money than they will make bitching about quantity
and are still up overall. They can piss and moan as we Python modules. We know the numbers as they fall as we linger in direct cash flow.
They are pissing and moaning no hat or cattle effects since we watch and owned the 400 acre and watched the to 4000 acre transformation
periods since the life boat ethics white paper as the 40000 collapsed and why with how in regional affairs.
Like you said they are cheeseheads for a reason you had to survive.

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/mor ... ing-office
Did not see that one coming.
Capex AI as we noted will increase and for our sample view 250 years of experience retiring in to the 2024 pivot.
I reviewed nine reason how they are going to screw the Americans public but that is another study.

[PedroG05]

Hace un mes estuve hablando de la situación económica con mi mamá. Le dije que creo que nos dirigimos a otra gran depresión y ella negó que tal depresión pudiera ocurrir alguna vez, adoptando una visión más optimista de que no empeoraríamos nada que una recesión promedio como muchas otras que Estados Unidos ha tenido.

[aeden]

Há um mês eu estava conversando sobre a situação econômica com minha mãe. Eu disse a ela que acho que estamos caminhando para outra grande depressão e ela negou que tal depressão pudesse ocorrer, assumindo uma visão mais otimista de que não teríamos nada pior do que uma recessão média como muitas outras que a América já teve.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/i ... -illinois/

[aeden]

APMEX had a tube of 20 2021 ASE's for $900 today ($45 a pop). bop

[aeden]

Some genius on the Potomac will tell the flyover retards will just get over the Ferals in the swamp.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=MIR+payment+s ... ave&ia=web
The payment system makes use of several security protocols.

This Administration really has no f#cking clue.

As it was said the level of prog stupidity has reached a point no one ever thought possible.
Yuri told you also what was already here and you simply are that stupid.

[aeden]

The West will have to rely on 'hostile regimes' for its supply".
Fixed it as they get confused lacking butt hurt reports.
What Senate are we talking about.

[aeden]

ETF of semiconductor companies throughout Asia.
Retards here have 10,000,000 ready to evict and nope the money did not get to Decatur
Illinois blue serfs. Burn loot murder was on a shopping spree like the other left tards
that offshored millions when they got called out.
The other cult bugged light bulbs and toaster on there own trading partners.
Ever since Barkey and before we knew it was really clear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_87AoQaKNw

[aeden]

TYLER DURDEN
THURSDAY, JUN 03, 2021 - 08:06 AM
Futures were already looking a shaky when they took a hit lower after news that Russia would cut the dollar from its sovereign wealth fund, shifting to euros, yuan and gold instead in an attempt to reduce exposure to U.S. assets amid threats of sanctions. . They then slumped even more on the perfectly predictable news that AMC would offer 11.55mm shares in an At The Market offering, with the Emini sliding 0.6% to 4,175 after trading around 4,210 for much of the overnight session. Nasdaq futures were hit even harder, dropping 1% even though the broader risk-off mood did not help TSY yields which rose modestly, while the dollar barely dipped from its upward trajectory even as Bitcoin rose again, approaching $40,000.

[Higgenbotham]

As far as long term bears, they don't exist anymore so we can't read their opinions.

True as I watched a podcast from the Islands so we are on to not worried about the Gartman and Dent indicators
and no we are picking on any indicator.
I thought of that in a back corner as the critics thought April that slipped into June from the podcast I took the time
to listen to from Stansbury with Dent collapse early in the rear as the today retards use rule 5 like the plucked Stalin's chickens
as we try to form a view from history some are unaware. The point H is we lost more money than they will make bitching about quantity
and are still up overall. They can piss and moan as we Python modules. We know the numbers as they fall as we linger in direct cash flow.
They are pissing and moaning no hat or cattle effects since we watch and owned the 400 acre and watched the to 4000 acre transformation
periods since the life boat ethics white paper as the 40000 collapsed and why with how in regional affairs.
Like you said they are cheeseheads for a reason you had to survive.

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/mor ... ing-office
Did not see that one coming.
Capex AI as we noted will increase and for our sample view 250 years of experience retiring in to the 2024 pivot.
I reviewed nine reason how they are going to screw the Americans public but that is another study.

After I posted that, I found a writeup in the Financial Times by Hussman from about 2 weeks ago. There were 153 comments on the article and I read them all. Financial Times is British and I noticed in the comments section that UK based commenters spent a lot of time pointing out that UK stocks are at reasonable valuations relative to US stocks. The bulls had the microphone and hammered on Hussman's terrible track record on his funds and his apparent ego problem. That's true enough but it doesn't pertain to the issue, which is whether this thing is truly overvalued or not according to his models and by how much. A minority of the bulls made some apparent valid points in that regard. One of them was that the market cap to GDP indicator is flawed because S&P 500 companies sell internationally and it's not just US GDP that makes up their market anymore. They didn't mention that our S&P 500 companies don't have a monopoly on our market either and by approximately what factor the market cap divided by GDP indicator should be adjusted. I think this point has in fact been valid looking into the rear view mirror, but the real question is what happens if/when globalization reverses due to any number of factors and how much is US GDP truly when consumers are being handed trillions, etc., and is that sustainable. No mention of that and there were no rebuttals from bears, as bears no longer exist as we said. Others made the point that margin adjusted indicators are flawed. I disagree and your link above from zero hedge is one reason. They made some other related points in a similar vein, essentially that the valuation indicators that have been tried and true overstate the overvaluation in the market.

[aeden]

I consider the transition error noise is the informal economy to the root issue wanted to be seen that does not exist.
The report from transitory survival is not happening as we enter the demographics worker replacement peak into 2024.
The fact you pointed was at the current rate of change we seen from the American equity ratio to European bond transitions.
I consider the z score to pin a result as we watch the passive funds incremental gain.

The 21 percent error of the AI audit model will simply be replaced if/then ignored anyways.
We had to consider it was feature to inflict the commodity pain it was meant to do.
Two sides of the trade and since Ireland stood firm on its Domicile rate the math indicated
the correction to say flaw in the logic unfolded they used.
As we adjusted last time the effective tax rate is the factor as it will be going forward.
Just me but the logic of your criticism rings true as we do not fight the tape.

https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inli ... k=OnAhJwY8
Taxes matter and data fragility rules as before to pragmatic policy to retain effective decisions.
It is hard to accept that taxes are paid by consumer prices longer than any one can stay solvent also.

As you noted .
They made some other related points in a similar vein, essentially that the valuation indicators that have been tried and true overstate the overvaluation in the market.

https://smithonstocks.com/part-8-illega ... of-stocks/
https://smithonstocks.com/part-7-illega ... -shorting/

They pay me for the spread when they short. Sometimes I short other z scores other than my positions. Not today and hope you caught the brief air pocket sentiment interlude until the facts assert themselves as the effective tax rate and the collapse of those civilizations who resist its iron law.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOEwwWKaMTQ