Generational Dynamics World View News

Discussion of Web Log and Analysis topics from the Generational Dynamics web site.
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by John »

** 11-Dec-2021 World View: Democrat party attitudes towards Latinos and blacks

The Biden administration are purposely keeping the Southern border
open, and are doing as much as they can to insert hundreds of
thousands or millions of illegal immigrants into enclaves in cities
across the nation. We can be pretty sure that this is being done
under the assumption that they will all become citizens and vote for
Democrats.

This is combined with a strategy by the KKK Democrats to kill off as
many blacks as possible in Democrat-run cities, following the goals of
the Democrat KKK in the last century. It now appears that a part of
that strategy is to kill as many blacks as possible through illegal
opioids coming through the Southern border.

Here's a recent statement from a Biden administration web site that
describes what's happening:
> "Non-Hispanic Black individuals in four U.S. states
> experienced a 38% increase in the rate of opioid overdose deaths
> from 2018 to 2019, while the rates for other race and ethnicity
> groups held steady or decreased, according to a new study by the
> National Institutes of Health published in the American Journal of
> Public Health. These alarming data are in line with other research
> documenting a widening of disparities in overdose deaths in Black
> communities in recent years, largely driven by heroin and illicit
> fentanyl. The research emphasizes the need for equitable,
> data-driven, community-based interventions that address these
> disparities."
This study produces data that it claims is "alarming," but we know
that the Biden administration is purposely keeping the Southern border
open to illegal immigrants, human traffickers, and drug cartels, and
we have to assume that the Biden administration is doing this on
purpose, and therefore is purposely poisoning people, especially
targeting blacks, with opioids. If this weren't true, then they'd do
something about it. So yes, this study is "alarming," but so are the
massacres of blacks in Democrat-run cities. Everything the Biden
administration does is "alarming."

I've never bought the claim that Latinos are automatically going to
vote for Democrats. For one thing, I've read articles in the past
about how 2nd and 3rd generation Latinos are strongly opposed to
illegal immigration of more Latinos, since all Latinos compete for the
same jobs and resources. Second, it's been clear for a long time that
blacks and Latinos don't like each other very much, because they
compete for the same jobs and resources.

In fact, we've discussed the hostility between blacks and Latinos in
this forum -- not recently, but in the past.

The Democrats are counting on new Latino citizens voting for
Democrats, but I've always doubted that, and a posting by blogger Ann
Althouse discusses this.

What I found most interesting about her blog posts is the comments
that followed it. I'm taking the liberty of copying a number of these
comments:
> "So, if Asians aren't 'people of color' (just ask
> anyone doing college admissions, or talking about the "lack of
> diversity" at major tech firms), and Hispanics aren't 'people of
> color', what, exactly, is the difference between 'people of color'
> and the infamous old term 'colored people'?"
> "Our cleaning lady came from El Salvador in the
> eighties. She drives a brand new Toyota Highlander, she and her
> husband own a home, and both of her children are professionals,
> married with children. She is a big Trumpster. She is not a fan of
> illegal immigration, because the kind of people they wanted to get
> away from are streaming into the country in droves."
> "This follows from the Democratic Party's wishful
> thinking of a "permanent majority" circa the Reagan
> Administration's immigration policy changes of the 1980s. At that
> point the US was 80% to 90% White, and non-White groups of that
> era voted very heavily for Democrats. Those advocating looser
> immigration and open borders saw a larger non-White population as
> a way to build and keep an edge over Republican conservatives --
> as historically mostly White.

> Miscalculations:

> 1. People in Latin America do vote for conservatives and Latin
> American countries often have conservative governments. E.g.,
> Catholics with historically large families. Therefore, when the
> non-White population reaches a critical mass its ideological
> orientation stands to revert to the mean/average.

> 2. The "Hispanic" category is extremely dated per pre-1960s race
> concepts and Hispanic is not a unified thing. Hispanic includes
> everything from Spanish-speaking but WHITE urban sophisticates
> from large cities, to native/tribal populations, to the multi-race
> offspring of former African slaves. So, one actually gets a broad
> cut of broad views and ideologies.

> As a result, we now have a perverse PUMPING UP of racial divisions
> by the party that once sought to eliminate them. As recently as
> the 1990s some on the left said "Race is only a social construct
> and it does not actually exist." But, it existed again as soon as
> needed for political purposes.

> Wait for irreversible and shocking political splits that were once
> unthinkable."
> "If Hispanics turn Republican by, say, a two-to-one
> margin, Democratic elites will sound like Donald Trump begging for
> a border wall."
> "Small sample size to be sure, but none of the
> Hispanics (both legal immigrants and those born here) I know are
> in favor of unlimited immigration. When it comes to racism, the
> way they talk about blacks would put the biggest white bigot on
> earth to shame. And Hispanics are nowhere near PC enough to
> GAF. If blacks think that how whites treat them is a problem,
> they've got another think coming."
> "When my family immigrated from Venezuela to the US in
> 1980, it was to leave corruption in the oil industry and poor
> educational opportunities for women behind. My dad refused to
> purchase cheap or refurbished equipment with funds allocated for
> quality parts so that he could make money under the table to
> divide with supervisors and other department heads. And he wanted
> his daughters to be educated well, graduate from college, and be
> established in successful careers.

> Since we left, Venezuela descended into chaos. Many of our family
> members left the rampant crime and the repression and scarcity of
> communism (in everything but name) for Florida, Spain, and other
> places. They say that they do not want the kind of people and
> mentality they left to follow them here. Many support the Wall to
> keep out the riff-raff along with the crime, drugs, and guns that
> pour over the unregulated border.

> A few years ago, Mickey Kaus made the point that the poor are most
> hurt by those who come in and undercut their wages. That may also
> be driving the desire to shut the door behind you, so to speak.

> One of the ladies who worked at the school I was at a few years
> ago was very anti-Trump because her brother was deported after
> being rear-ended. He was not at fault, but the accident exposed
> his immigration status. 2 years later when I came to buy pupusas
> at her dad's church, her brothers told me that many businesses
> being destroyed in the BLM riots were Hispanic-owned. They had
> family suffering great financial losses.

> Another friend who had come into this country illegally told me
> that she and her husband (who is now a master plumber) were
> supporters of the wall. She had become a citizen in 2019 and voted
> for Trump. They are solidly middle-class and their children are in
> GT classes. They only allow Spanish at home, but want their kids
> learning English at school so that they will be successful. She
> told me that the school she attended in her mountain village in
> Mexico is now surrounded by high concrete walls because of the
> bullets that whizzed through the playground during a drug gang
> shootout. She was alarmed at the recent surge in crime in our
> cities."
> "In most cases, Hispanic is a euphemism for
> Mestizo. An actual European Spaniard doesn't
> qualify."
> ""Three-fifths of Latinos in the national exit poll
> said they believed life would be better for the next generation of
> Americans. They are also patriotic . . . this constituency does
> not harbor particularly radical views on the nature of American
> society and its supposed intrinsic racism and white supremacy."

> Telling, isn't it, that believing in a better life, being
> patriotic, and not being radical about racism is not just bad, but
> "worse" for Dems. The Dem party, the Dem commentator implies, is
> for people who are not patriotic, do not believe in a better
> future, but do hate Amerikkka."
> "The problem for Democrats is that they see groups
> through the filter of their own expectations. After all, it's
> worked pretty well for them with Black's for generations.

> But Hispanics are different. For one thing, they are not a
> homogenous group. A Mexican is different than a Cuban. Further,
> they are not united by a history of slavery as Blacks are. And
> virtually all came here voluntarily (and I might add legally)
> because they saw something here that they liked. It's called
> opportunity.

> The Democrats screwed the pooch when they went all in on open
> borders. This has never been popular with Hispanics. Add in the
> Democrat's soft on crime policies and ambivalence towards free
> enterprise and you have a perfect trifecta."
> "Years ago I attended a lecture by a distinguished
> sociologist. The lecture was on a different subject but he
> observed in passing that the Hispanic "minority" was created
> entirely for political reasons. Politics aside, there is no
> sociological reason to treat Hispanics as a minority any more than
> we treat Greek-Americans or Irish-Americans as one: no distinct
> religion, no distinct language for people born in this country,
> they marry freely outside the group, etc."
> "Democrats are nuts. Just look at Crazy Nancy Pelosi,
> lying Shifty Schiff, Fang Banger Swalwell, Chuckie the Clown
> Schumer...not to mention the hateful bigoted Squad who are taking
> over the party."
> "An Asian woman I know told me her employer forced
> everyone into a diversity training run by some tranny earlier this
> year and she was called a POC. She's said she's never been so
> insulted in her life and she's been called straight up racist
> names in the street by strangers. She's never considered herself a
> POC as she just doesn't think in racial terms. She's gotten where
> she has in her career through her own hard work and determination.

> It's also not surprising that most Hispanics similarly don't
> really think of themselves as POCs (or Lah-tinks or some other
> made up label) and they like this country and think it offers them
> quite a bit of opportunity to make a good life for themselves.

> It seems the left and much of the Democrat Party wants to undo
> America solely for the benefit of blacks. They try to include
> non-blacks and gays, but they do so half-heartedly. Their
> preferred solution is to eliminate standards of
> accountability. They just don't think blacks can measure up, so
> they want to get rid of all the measures. They want to eliminate
> standards in schools, make crime legal, get rid of police,
> eliminate Civil Rights and due process, censor speech, and hand
> out free money - all as some sort of reparations for something
> they believe can never be repaired. All of these, of course, hurts
> everyone, including Hispanics.

> It's as if the Left's view of blacks is "life is harder for THOSE
> PEOPLE, so we need to make it easy for them." You see it with
> vaccine hesitancy. White vaccine hesitant folks are smeared as
> nothing backwards ass MAGA-hat wearing bigots who need to be
> forced or die, but when it comes to black folks who feel the same
> way, the attitude shifts to "THOSE PEOPLE just don't know any
> better." WTF?

> It's no wonder that Hispanics or Asians (not to mention Irish,
> Jewish, and Italians) - particularly folks whos ancestors came to
> America post-Civil War and faced numerous racial obstacles of
> their own - don't feel like they owe some fucking moral debt to
> this one single group of people who, according to the very folks
> pushing this agenda, can't get their shit together."
> "My Italian grandparents came here nothing. Italians
> and Hispanics have so many similarities. Italians were Dems for a
> generation or 2, then many went Rep. Hispanics are transitioning
> more quickly."
> "Our next door neighbor is Spanish. He has the
> American and Texas flags flying outside his house. He works, as
> does his wife, and kids go to school. NOT ONE WIT DIFFERENT THAN
> US OR OTHER NEIGHBORS.

> Now I've worked at a Catholic charity that gives cloths free to
> the needy. Spanish come there and they get just a few
> items... they don't want handouts.. blacks come there and get
> things by the shopping cart.

> Very different mindsets.

> So which way do you think they vote?

> Once the Democrats start realizing this they will shut down the
> border faster than you can sneeze."
> "I don’t imagine it helped when Pelosi publicly
> embraced MS-13. MS-13 preferentially preys upon Hispanics and are
> not well liked by citizens of Hispanic descent."
> "I predicted 20 years ago that this would happen,
> because hispanics are the third culturally Roman Catholic group to
> arrive in the US in great numbers, along with the Irish (mid-19th
> C) and Italians (early-20th C). Nearly all immigrant groups will
> start out voting Democrat, but it's what happens in later
> generations that matters.

> The Irish, a Gaelic culture, remained loyal Democrats. The
> Italians, a Latin culture, became deeply Republican. It was
> logical that hispanics, also a Latin culture, would behave much
> more like Italians than Irish, which is what we're now
> seeing."
> "My SIL is Hispanic and we talk about this during our
> weekly Sunday morning breakfast. He says the Hispanic community
> (not the activist talking heads and politicos) are very upset
> about illegal immigration. His immigrant father is particularly
> vocal, he says. They all feel the impact on their struggling
> businesses when they have to compete against illegal day
> labor. Cesar Chavez knew this and was virulently anti illegal
> immigration. Any open border politician should be hounded away
> from any celebration of Chavez."
> "Again, I had to go to college to learn that most of
> the "Hispanics" I grew up with, played with, worked with, and
> studied with weren't white. I imagine a lot of them were surprised
> to learn they weren't white, too!"
> "News flash--try as they do, Democrats also make
> mistakes lumping all "Hispanics" in one group. Ditto "Asians and
> Pacific Islanders." Ditto "Blacks." Ditto "Whites." Ditto "Native
> Americans."

> To think a Cuban whose parents fled Castro has a lot in common
> with a Mexican who left Zacateca or a Hispanic whose ancestors
> owned property in California at the time of the Treaty of
> Guadalupe-Hidalgo, is the height of arrogance. And what does a
> poor Afghan have in common with an engineer from Bangalore with
> the grandchild of a Hmong whofled the Communists in 1975, with a
> Chinese child of privilege enrolled at Stanford, with a Japanese
> whose ancestors came ver in the 1890s, with the descendant of the
> cHinese brought over to build railroads in the 1880s, with an
> Indonesian or a Filipino? A descendant of slaves witha Nigerian
> doctor who just arrived, voluntarily? A WASP decsendant from
> Massachusetts Bay Colony, with dec]scendants of Irish who came
> over to avoid the Potato Famine, a German Jew fleeing the defeat
> of 1848, or a Russian Jew fleeing pogroms in 1907, or...

> It is all insane and deeply insulting and dehumanizing. And as
> hard as the politicians and media and faux academics and allied
> groups work at creating these false ethnicities, reality has a way
> of eventualy shining a light on things they would prefer remain in
> the shadow."
**** Sources:

-- [Democrats lumping Lations and blacks together]
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2021/12/i ... -that.html
(Ann Althouse, 9-Dec-2021)

-- Disparities in opioid overdose deaths continue to worsen for Black
people, study suggests
https://www.drugabuse.gov/news-events/n ... y-suggests
(DrugAbuse.gov, 9-Sep-2021)


**** Related article:

** 25-Nov-21 World View -- Ahmaud Arberry verdict and the KKK Democrats
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ ... tm#e211125

Guest

Re: Russia as modern Habsburg Empire

Post by Guest »

Navigator wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:14 pm
FullMoon wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:55 pm
Navigator wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 12:56 pm


I should have written "keep us busy" instead of "occupy" I certainly did not mean take over the USA.
Thanks for the clarification. You mentioned finishing preparations. What timeline are you looking at going forward and at what point will preparations turn into something we either have or don't have?
I think the Russians will move vs Ukraine in January, early Feb at the latest.

I think the Chinese will move vs Taiwan in April, but they may postpone till October at the latest.

Their intel services will be telling them they need to be done before the US 2022 elections.
Having commanded the US 3rd Army into Germany, General Patton said: “We have defeated the wrong enemy”.

Patton was clearly talking about the Soviets or Russians. Here are some of his quotes about the Soviets:

“We promised the Europeans freedom. It would be worse than dishonorable not to see they have it. This might mean war with the Russians, but what of it? They have no Air Force anymore ,their gasoline and ammunition supplies are low .I've seen their miserable supply trains; mostly wagons drawn by beaten up old hoses or oxen. I'll say this; the Third Army alone with very little help and with damned few casualties, could lick what is left of the Russians in six weeks. You mark my words. Don't ever forget them. Someday we will have to fight them and it will take six years and cost us six million lives.”

“There are all kins of low class slime who are trying and will continue to try to wreck this country from the inside. Most of them don't know it, but they are actually working for the Russians. Some of them do know it, though. It doesn't matter whether they call themselves communists, socialists, or just plain liberals. That is what they are doing.”

“We have destroyed what could have been a good race of people [Germans] and we are about to replace them with mongolian savages and all of Europe with communism”

“General Anders of the Polish 2nd corps told me that if his corps got between a German Army and a Russian Army, he would have trouble deciding which direction to fight.”

“The one thing which I could not say then, and cannot yet say, is that my chief interest in establishing order in Germany was to prevent Germany from going communist. I am afraid that our foolish and utterly stupid policy regard to Germany will certainly cause them to join the Russians, and there by insure communistic state throughout western Europe”

“If it should be necessary for us fight the Russians. the sooner we do it, the better. If we have to fight them , now is the time. From now on, we will get weaker and they will get stronger.”

“It is said that for the first week after the Russians took berlin, all woman who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken Berlin if I had been allowed.”

“I believe that Germany should not be destroyed, but rather should be rebuilt as a buffer against the real danger, which is Russia and it's bolshevism.”

“Russia knows what it wants: world domination, and she is laying her plans accordingly. We on the other hand, and England, and France to a lesser extent, don't know what we want and get less than nothing as the result.”

"Let's keep our boots polished bayonets sharpened, and present a picture of force and strength to the Russians. This is the only language that they understand and respect. If you fail to do this, then I would like to say that we have had a victory over the Germans and have disarmed them, but we have lost the war."

guest

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by guest »

Burner Prime wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:30 am


There's so much garbage written here, trying to unpack it is like trying to sift through a truckload of rotten putrid sewage.

The project-syndicate article is so tired and lame, I lost interest after the first sentence, "threat to world peace..." LOL why not just say, "dangerous to our damocrassah..." It could have written by a bot programmed by Neo-Con Incorporated.

A summary is just boilerplate "wag the dog": Start a war to hide problems at home. Oh, the West never did such a thing...LOL. Don't worry though, no one is going to war.

Navigator is right that Biden and Europe will do nothing about Putin's moves. You all don't remember how often Russia made moves against her satellites in the past and the West did nothing. That's because they don't pose an existential threat. Pat Buchanan has repeatedly written at length about this. Navigator is also careful to say Russia wants the 'industrial areas' of Ukraine - not to take it over. What is pretty clear is that Russia does not intend to take it all the way to Kiev.

What's really going on is that for decades Russia has protested against NATO expansion to her doorstep, but have been ignored by an emboldened West who took full advantage of the fall of the Soviet Empire. Now she is fed up and will not allow Ukraine to become a NATO member. They are proving how serious they are by their current military preparations.

Despite what Psaki and Europeans say publicly about it, expect that some agreement will be made, in effect a guarantee that Ukraine will not be made a member. We won't find out about the secret agreement for 20-30 yrs.

There is absolutely no indication that Europeans are itching for a full-blown war against Russia and are willing to die to protect Eastern Ukraine "for our damocrassah...". They are just as fat, lazy, and entitled as Americans and want to enjoy sunny vacations in the Mediterranean and get all kinds of free stuff from the Money Printers. They have no taste of hardship and aren't going to leave their spas and warm living rooms to "save our damocrassah.. LOL".

Russia has already moved tanks into Donbas and will occupy it for a long time. They probably hope the de-facto occupation will become permanent, like the Israelis do for the West Bank. The West will run their mouths and issue some sanctions.

As for the "illegal annexation" of Crimea, that is a total joke. Crimea was fake-gifted to Ukraine in 1954 while still a Soviet state and the thinking was they'd always be part of the Soviet Union and under Russian control. You could just as well call the entire European occupation of North America as an "illegal annexation", so using terms like that is strictly for the gullible normies. Use your propaganda as you like. It's all BS.

All that other BS, like commenting on how weak the Russian military is, is just to whip up the proles against the Russians and pick a fight. A tired old Neo-Con exercise. You could say the same about N Korea, but no one tangles with them. The West won't tangle with Russia as well. And they probably aren't as easy pickings as you think, especially with those S-500s. The West is only effective when they have heavy air support, otherwise ground forces tend to hunker down and shelter in place.

Have you seen the vids where Russians run US vehicles off the road in Syria? Russians are not afraid to mix it up with Americans who are more concerned with a gender fluid military that martial prowess.

Finally anyone who cites what Biden says or "thinks" is nothing but an idiot and fool and is to be totally ignored. Biden has no mental faculties and simply reads off policies handed to him by people like Blinken and other handlers. He couldn't even say one word about the Omicron variant when asked by a reporter, until he got to the WH and received orders and prepared statements from his handling team. His main concern is ice cream and Teen Magazine. The whole world knows this including Russia and China of course.
Putin looks good in comparison to western psychopaths but he's still just the best horse in the glue factory. Ron Paul he ain't.

ItsOKtobWht

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by ItsOKtobWht »

Putin is ex-KGB. He looks good because the 'leaders' in the West are so appallingly awful.

El Cid M

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by El Cid M »

With Biden now in charge--kind of--America was supposed to be all unicorns and rainbows. Only the unicorns are covered in tats and the rainbows are stuck on car bumpers, flags, and t-shirts.

America is over.

Guest

Re: Russia as modern Habsburg Empire

Post by Guest »

Navigator wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:14 pm
FullMoon wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:55 pm
Navigator wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 12:56 pm


I should have written "keep us busy" instead of "occupy" I certainly did not mean take over the USA.
Thanks for the clarification. You mentioned finishing preparations. What timeline are you looking at going forward and at what point will preparations turn into something we either have or don't have?
I think the Russians will move vs Ukraine in January, early Feb at the latest.

I think the Chinese will move vs Taiwan in April, but they may postpone till October at the latest.

Their intel services will be telling them they need to be done before the US 2022 elections.
Russia edges closer to war as new arms arrive on Ukraine’s border
A recent sighting of Putin’s notorious Buk missiles on their way to the frontline does not bode well for talks
“Even if Putin gets something from the west, serious talks or discussions about guarantees – will that be enough for Putin?” said Tatiana Stanovaya, founder of the political analysis firm R.Politik. “We are witnessing the dawn of a new geopolitical adventurism from Russia.”

Despite the Putin-Biden talks, the crisis is growing deeper.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... k-missiles

Burner Prime

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by Burner Prime »

Guest wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 6:12 am
As for the "illegal annexation" of Crimea, that is a total joke. Crimea was fake-gifted to Ukraine in 1954 while still a Soviet state and the thinking was they'd always be part of the Soviet Union and under Russian control. You could just as well call the entire European occupation of North America as an "illegal annexation", so using terms like that is strictly for the gullible normies. Use your propaganda as you like. It's all BS.
Crimea has been the homeland of the Krim Tatars for over 1000 years, not Russian. They took it over in the late 1700s. That's not ancient history. The Tatars, like the Chechens, were evicted by the Soviets and returned to their homelands decades later. That doesn't make Chechnya and the Crimea "Russian".
Have you seen the vids where Russians run US vehicles off the road in Syria? Russians are not afraid to mix it up with Americans who are more concerned with a gender fluid military that martial prowess.
The last time the Russians clashed with US forces in Syria they suffered hundreds of combat deaths--hundreds. I don't think the American Special Forces suffered a single wounded. Where do you get your information from, RT television?

You are, BP, are an one of Putin's useless idiots.

You are the one posting garbage.
I normally don't respond to the peanut gallery, but this post by an anon "Guest" deserves it to illustrate how liars and phonies operate. In short they obfuscate facts and change the parameters of the argument making a counterargument that doesn't address the initial claim - think 'straw man'.

First, at least cite your story or sources. Since you're too lazy, I'll do it for you. You are referencing the Battle of Khasham:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khasham

Like you say: "Where do you get your information from, Neo-Con News? "

Your first lie omits the fact that the "hundreds" were a combined Syrian and Russian (Wagner group) contractors, not Russian regular forces. You lie.

The casualty reports vary a lot, but through the noise, possibly around 80-100 Russian contractors were killed.

The facts surrounding the battle paint the picture that your lies don't. One is that if Russia had reported their troops being in the area, the US would not have authorized a strike. Instead they said no troops were there.
You lie.

Your second lie does the sleight-of-hand many liars and phonies use, that is ignoring the original premise and moving goal posts. The Syrian force had no air cover. As I clearly pointed out but you ignored, the West is only effective when they have air superiority. That is exactly what transpired: Bombers came in and laid waste, then helicopter gun ships finished them off. This is not any kind of Russian vs US head-to-head combat operation.
You lie.

If Russians had regular Russian troops in the area supported by air cover, the results would not have been anything like what happened, that is if the US even would engage (they would not have engaged). You also cite US special forces, who didn't do much except call in air strikes.
You lie. And you make my point that the US is only effective when they use air power, or engage a vastly weaker enemy.

The example I cite is of Regular Russian combat troops harassing regular US combat forces, racing and running their MRAPs off the road. That is a head-to-head confrontation that I am talking about, not Special Forces engaging a mix of volunteers, and using overwhelming superior air power.

I will ask one thing open to all: Cite one example since WWII where the US military went head to head against a comparable adversary and handily won. I'll wait... and that will be a long time because it never happened. I will cite one example, that is the Koran War when China got involved. We lost and probably only would have won if we followed MacArthur's insane advice and nuked China.

Guest

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by Guest »

No. I am not lying. I don't look to Wikipedia (which is usually grossly inaccurate) for my information. You are an idiot.

I read around 400 killed in much more credible news reports than...Wikipedia.

BP, you are truly stupid. And now that you have revealed that your source of information is Wikipedia and the Russian media, it shows you in a true light.

You are a fool. Not only to you trust Putin, but you look to the heavily manipulated Wikipedia for information.

BP, you a Russian stooge. Nothing more. And probably a lot less.

Guest

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by Guest »

Burner Prime wrote:
Sun Dec 12, 2021 9:50 pm
Guest wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 6:12 am
As for the "illegal annexation" of Crimea, that is a total joke. Crimea was fake-gifted to Ukraine in 1954 while still a Soviet state and the thinking was they'd always be part of the Soviet Union and under Russian control. You could just as well call the entire European occupation of North America as an "illegal annexation", so using terms like that is strictly for the gullible normies. Use your propaganda as you like. It's all BS.
Crimea has been the homeland of the Krim Tatars for over 1000 years, not Russian. They took it over in the late 1700s. That's not ancient history. The Tatars, like the Chechens, were evicted by the Soviets and returned to their homelands decades later. That doesn't make Chechnya and the Crimea "Russian".
Have you seen the vids where Russians run US vehicles off the road in Syria? Russians are not afraid to mix it up with Americans who are more concerned with a gender fluid military that martial prowess.
The last time the Russians clashed with US forces in Syria they suffered hundreds of combat deaths--hundreds. I don't think the American Special Forces suffered a single wounded. Where do you get your information from, RT television?

You are, BP, are an one of Putin's useless idiots.

You are the one posting garbage.
I normally don't respond to the peanut gallery, but this post by an anon "Guest" deserves it to illustrate how liars and phonies operate. In short they obfuscate facts and change the parameters of the argument making a counterargument that doesn't address the initial claim - think 'straw man'.

First, at least cite your story or sources. Since you're too lazy, I'll do it for you. You are referencing the Battle of Khasham:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khasham

Like you say: "Where do you get your information from, Neo-Con News? "

Your first lie omits the fact that the "hundreds" were a combined Syrian and Russian (Wagner group) contractors, not Russian regular forces. You lie.

The casualty reports vary a lot, but through the noise, possibly around 80-100 Russian contractors were killed.

The facts surrounding the battle paint the picture that your lies don't. One is that if Russia had reported their troops being in the area, the US would not have authorized a strike. Instead they said no troops were there.
You lie.

Your second lie does the sleight-of-hand many liars and phonies use, that is ignoring the original premise and moving goal posts. The Syrian force had no air cover. As I clearly pointed out but you ignored, the West is only effective when they have air superiority. That is exactly what transpired: Bombers came in and laid waste, then helicopter gun ships finished them off. This is not any kind of Russian vs US head-to-head combat operation.
You lie.

If Russians had regular Russian troops in the area supported by air cover, the results would not have been anything like what happened, that is if the US even would engage (they would not have engaged). You also cite US special forces, who didn't do much except call in air strikes.
You lie. And you make my point that the US is only effective when they use air power, or engage a vastly weaker enemy.

The example I cite is of Regular Russian combat troops harassing regular US combat forces, racing and running their MRAPs off the road. That is a head-to-head confrontation that I am talking about, not Special Forces engaging a mix of volunteers, and using overwhelming superior air power.

I will ask one thing open to all: Cite one example since WWII where the US military went head to head against a comparable adversary and handily won. I'll wait... and that will be a long time because it never happened. I will cite one example, that is the Koran War when China got involved. We lost and probably only would have won if we followed MacArthur's insane advice and nuked China.
Are here is why the alt-right will fail: The continuing belief that the Russians will save them. Burner Prime and his kind have no idea what Russia and Putin really represent. Do they really want to save Europe? If so, why do they flood Europe with Middle Eastern refugees? Why have they facilitated their arrival?

Putin doesn't respect the rights of other Russians. Russian jails are filled with people who spoke out against him and his massive theft of state funds and have paid dearly for it. Do you want to live like that in America? In Russia, there is no freedom of speech. Political Correctness is currently robbing us of free speech on many levels, but inviting Russia to conquer us will NOT bring it back. BP's mother and sister will end up as sex slaves to Russian soldiers and BP will die in an open pit mine. Maybe that should be Burner Prime's fate?

Burner Prime should take a break from the video games long enough to research Putin beyond RT television.

UNLESS BP is Russian. Is that it? Are you just a Russian troll? Then your stupidity would make sense.

John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by John »

** 13-Dec-2021 World View: Israel and UAE leaders have 'historic' meeting in Abu Dhabi

On Saturday, Israel's prime minister Naftali Bennett met with UAE
Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed (known as MBZ) in Abu
Dhabi, the capital city of United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The meeting is the most recent result of the Abraham Accords were
announced on August 13, 2020, and signed by the participants in
September. The Accords were negotiated by Donald Trump's
administration between Israel and UAE, later joined by Bahrain,
Morocco and Sudan. The Accords were considered historic because they
were the first public normalization of relations between Israel and an
Arab country since the agreement with Jordan in 1994 and the agreement
with Egypt in 1979. However, the Trump administration was frustrated
because while the Saudis were supportive of the Accords, Saudi Arabia
never formally joined the Accords.

The new meeting between Bennett and MBZ is being described as "very
warm," which is not surprising since they are aligned against Iran,
especially as Iran is in the final stages of developing a nuclear
weapon. The two leaders will certainly also discuss trade.

The Palestinians have condemned the Abraham Accords, seeing them as a
betrayal of the Palestinians, and will certainly condemn the
Israel-UAE meeting, since they violate a 2002 agreement among the Arab
nations to remain united against Israel until there is a Palestinian
state.

**** Sources

-- Israeli leader begins first visit to UAE as Iran tensions surge
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-ea ... 021-12-12/
(Reuters, 12-Dec-2021)

-- Israel’s PM Naftali Bennett to visit UAE to discuss deepening ties
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... -uae-visit
(Guardian, 13-Dec-2021)

-- Bennett to meet with UAE Crown Prince in historic first
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/ben ... uae-688512
(JerusalemPost, 12-Dec-2021)

**** Related articles

** 12-Nov-21 World View -- Israel holds joint naval exercises with UAE, Bahrain, affirming Abraham Accords
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ ... tm#e211112



** 6-Feb-20 World View -- Israeli diplomat reveals Israel's startling new 'pragmatic' foreign policy
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ ... tm#e200206

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 176 guests