And yes, that is true. ZOG hates him, though, for obvious reasons (cleaned them up and out).Guest wrote: ↑Sun Feb 06, 2022 9:10 amSpoke to someone who finally got their Visa to visit their Russian homeland. The "peasants" view Putin as a strong leader who cleaned up corruption. (First time poster, long time reader).This. Putin doesn't survive without the support of 1. the security services and 2. the oligarchs.
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
-
- Posts: 3040
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
-
- Posts: 3040
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
Oh look, BTC is up big again
And trolls don't post all of a sudden
See you at the ATH, trollskys
And trolls don't post all of a sudden
See you at the ATH, trollskys
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
You're the same troll who said you weren't worried about a grand or two on the way down because you have a tiny position in BTC anyway...Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:02 pmOh look, BTC is up big again
And trolls don't post all of a sudden
See you at the ATH, trollskys
due to that, I didn't think this little blip up was all that important.
-
- Posts: 3040
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
What's so hard about understanding I'm not worried at all, then or now, because I'm holding long term and this is a pristine asset.
Oh by the way, KPMG bought ... another large institution to get in. But hey, what do they (and I) know, right?
Right?
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
If you have the stones I do, and aren't a twat who worries about volatility because you understand the underlying asset class, you get rewarded.
BIGLY
Oh by the way, KPMG bought ... another large institution to get in. But hey, what do they (and I) know, right?
Right?
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
If you have the stones I do, and aren't a twat who worries about volatility because you understand the underlying asset class, you get rewarded.
BIGLY
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:59 pmIf you can't see the global signs of the times, the lies, the power mongering, and the insistence in hurting people and making trillions, how can you predict a war well? These are honest questions dealing with reality.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:06 pmJohn's war prediction has been trending true ever since it was made.
Guest wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 6:59 pmWhy don't you go argue with the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists about that one.Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:59 amHow do you tend true for a binary event? LOL, you really are a retard.
Last year they moved their nuclear war Doomsday Clock to 100 seconds to midnight, the closest it's ever been. Decades ago it was as far as 21 minutes to midnight.
They have moved their clock because the likelihood of war has been increasing for years and everybody has been acknowledging that. The only question being asked is, "How much closer are we?" That's the question the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists tries to answer.
Still at 100 seconds to midnight. This year's update:
At doom’s doorstep:
It is 100 seconds to midnight
2022 Doomsday Clock Statement
Science and Security Board
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Editor, John Mecklin
bulletin of atomic scientists 2020 doomsday clock 100 seconds to midnight
It is 100 seconds to midnight
Editor’s note: Founded in 1945 by Albert Einstein and University of Chicago scientists who helped develop the first atomic weapons in the Manhattan Project, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists created the Doomsday Clock two years later, using the imagery of apocalypse (midnight) and the contemporary idiom of nuclear explosion (countdown to zero) to convey threats to humanity and the planet. The Doomsday Clock is set every year by the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board in consultation with its Board of Sponsors, which includes 11 Nobel laureates. The Clock has become a universally recognized indicator of the world’s vulnerability to catastrophe from nuclear weapons, climate change, and disruptive technologies in other domains.
To: Leaders and citizens of the world
Re: At doom’s doorstep: It is 100 seconds to midnight
Date: January 20, 2022
https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/US relations with Russia and China remain tense, with all three countries engaged in an array of nuclear modernization and expansion efforts—including China’s apparent large-scale program to increase its deployment of silo-based long-range nuclear missiles; the push by Russia, China, and the United States to develop hypersonic missiles; and the continued testing of anti-satellite weapons by many nations. If not restrained, these efforts could mark the start of a dangerous new nuclear arms race. Other nuclear concerns, including North Korea’s unconstrained nuclear and missile expansion and the (as yet) unsuccessful attempts to revive the Iran nuclear deal contribute to growing dangers. Ukraine remains a potential flashpoint, and Russian troop deployments to the Ukrainian border heighten day-to-day tensions.
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists doomsday clock. Trending toward midnight for the past decade.


-
- Posts: 3040
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
"Climate Change?"
A smart or wise person when he sees that doesn't take such a thing seriously. Pathetic.
A smart or wise person when he sees that doesn't take such a thing seriously. Pathetic.
- Tom Mazanec
- Posts: 4199
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
When I see that comment, I know not to take you seriously.Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 1:20 pm"Climate Change?"
A smart or wise person when he sees that doesn't take such a thing seriously. Pathetic.
https://www.edf.org/climate/9-ways-we-k ... ate-change
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, Those Who Remain
― G. Michael Hopf, Those Who Remain
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests