Correction: The virus is the pathogen. The spike protein is what makes the virus pathogenic.
Sorry, I was drunk when I wrote that. I like to have a good stiff drink before reading your posts.
Correction: The virus is the pathogen. The spike protein is what makes the virus pathogenic.
Thanks for confirming that you have no idea how to use biological or medical terms. Just as I suspected...Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:48 amAre you injecting the virus?
Again, I'm right, you're wrong. Thanks for confirming it yet again.
The generally accepted figure is about 5% of Russians are actually religious. A large number say that they are Orthodox, but that us more of a general feeling of historical Russian-ness rather than any actual religious belief. You haven't seen any such claim from a US president because thus far none og them have been Orthodox. Note the capital "O".Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 7:30 pm
Whether he is a christian, only God knows, but he has been to Mt Athos and publicly states he is an orthodox christian. I haven't seen that from a US president for years, nor any other supporting measure to back it. They don't allow degenerates to parade in their streets and corrupt the society and youth - very wise and also christian. He is for the sovereignty of his country, he disallowed the selling off of many capital and business functions of the former soviet states to outsiders (harvard boys do russia) which is largely why jews and thus the US don't like him, etc.
He is a great leader, regardless of what you say, and I just gave several reasons why. Think again.
The US imposes strict impositions and sanctions on the Russian Federation because it isn't part of globohomo. Nice calling me names, as if "antisemitism" means anything, or I even care. None of the people causing the problems are semitic, by the way, moron. Get a clue and do some historical research.Xeraphim1 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:55 pmAnd no, he isn't a "great leader". Look at the conditions of Russians in the years since 2014 which was the last Russian invasion of a neighboring state. GDP growth has stagnated or fallen; average income is down; the ruble has depreciated against other currencies; FDI is very low and really only comes from China which is not a good sign; and corruption is higher. In fact, Ukraine, long a poster child for corruption, is less corrupt that Russia (122 vs 136.)
And your antisemitism is noted.
The difference is that Chang has done the research, and I've done theCool Breeze wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 5:31 pm> Chang has always seemed like a nice/good guy, but he's been
> calling for the implosion of China for almost 20 years.
> He reminds me of Jim Rickards, Kyle Bass and Peter Schiff. Except
> he didn't event get lucky on a call yet.
> Yawn.
Research is only part of the process. If you're wrong about every prediction, no one cares how hard you "tried."John wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 11:29 pm** 18-Feb-2022 World View: Research
The difference is that Chang has done the research, and I've done theCool Breeze wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 5:31 pm> Chang has always seemed like a nice/good guy, but he's been
> calling for the implosion of China for almost 20 years.
> He reminds me of Jim Rickards, Kyle Bass and Peter Schiff. Except
> he didn't event get lucky on a call yet.
> Yawn.
research, while you're talking out of your ass.
Dude, you don't even know how to use the word "Pathogen" correctly. Coming from someone who said you are a "physician" that is pretty rich. Care to discuss that some more?Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 2:12 pmResearch is only part of the process. If you're wrong about every prediction, no one cares how hard you "tried."John wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 11:29 pm** 18-Feb-2022 World View: Research
The difference is that Chang has done the research, and I've done theCool Breeze wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 5:31 pm> Chang has always seemed like a nice/good guy, but he's been
> calling for the implosion of China for almost 20 years.
> He reminds me of Jim Rickards, Kyle Bass and Peter Schiff. Except
> he didn't event get lucky on a call yet.
> Yawn.
research, while you're talking out of your ass.
So sorry to break that to you again.
I've made hundreds of Generational Dynamics predictions in 20 years,Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 2:12 pm> Research is only part of the process. If you're wrong about every
> prediction, no one cares how hard you "tried."
> So sorry to break that to you again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests