Generational Dynamics World View News

[Tom Mazanec]

Why is there so much public discussion on China invading Taiwan "before the end of the year" ? Do the PTB know something that we don't?

Wouldn't that have to be "before the end of next month"? Isn't it true that the weather requires the invasion to be in autumn or spring?

[Guest]

Why is there so much public discussion on China invading Taiwan "before the end of the year" ? Do the PTB know something that we don't?

Wouldn't that have to be "before the end of next month"? Isn't it true that the weather requires the invasion to be in autumn or spring?

The Red Chinese don't seem to be very clever, and with clueless Xi in charge, who knows?

[Bob Butler]

[ Pretending loyalty to Trump is understandable if you have racist tendencies or have strong religious or moral views that you wish to impose on others, but it leaves one in space sometimes.

"Declaring some loyalty to Trump is understandable if you wish to secure the border, want America to be respected internationally, want the Constitution to be followed by law enforcement, want America to be energy self-sufficient and thriving economically, want to control what happens to your minor children, and otherwise generally don't want to F*** with anyone else or be F***** with."

Bob, the reason you get slammed so often on this board is your inability to use reason and logic. Hence Spotty's reply.,, (Snip.)

Granted, there may be other reasons to favor Trump, but to do so requires being blind to his rather blatant faults. You have to buy into them, which is not an act of reason, logic or morality.

The primary idea here, at the core of Generational Dynamics, is that if you learn to hate other groups - often ethnic - you have an advantage in using force. You become immune to morality and love. I oft argue that force is no longer advantageous. Whether you are trying to profit from war or maintain domestic racial superiority, pursuing violence is not from my perspective advantageous. Thus, the central idea behind Generational Dynamics is racist and flawed. Trying to present violence as cool requires acceptance of equally flawed ideas.

This does not mean am a stranger to logic and fact. Did my comment on Trumps behaviors breach logic or fact? Did he violate the constitution, break up families, F*** around, act criminally, or do the rest? When you gloss over these flaws, are you not glossing over logic, fact and truth?

My difference is in saying there are two different worldviews, and if you but into one you end up buying into the whole package, including the parts that are In no way pardonable.

I agree, the Ten Commandments include one culture’s way of expressing certain near universal concepts that are endorsed and included by many going on all cultures. Yet hating Jews is also embraced by a lot of cultures. (That dates back to their viewing usury differently from Christians at the time, thus some Jewish bankers provided loan service no others chose to provide. This evolved into a hatred of the entire Jewish culture, even after providing loans became acceptable.) Not stealing, not murdering, respecting family and showing love are common values given lip service by many cultures. Stealing, murdering, tearing apart families and hate are common too. One still comes back to hating the other and seeking superiority and control. One shouldn’t. One should not wage wars such as Putin’s. One should not provoke insurrections like Trump. One should not tear children from parents. One should not F*** around without consent and respect.

While there are some conservative ideas that can be defended or even embraced, the current MAGA crowd is not focused there.

[tim]

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new- ... retty-much

A new study shows that nearly everyone getting the mRNA COVID vaccines are experiencing some amount of heart damage.

A new study out of Switzerland shows that vaccinated people have uniformly higher troponin levels than their unvaccinated peers.

In the graph shown at 6:21, we see that the 777 people who got the booster in this study have uniformly higher troponin levels than their matched unvaccinated peers. That is not supposed to happen. If the vaccines are safe, the troponin levels should be nearly identical between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.

Here are Professor Prasad’s exact words:

It's not just the tip of the distribution that has elevated high sensitivity troponin, it's that the entire distribution is right shifted. Everybody's having a little bit of elevation in high sensitivity troponin. That's what this graph would have you infer.

You get a troponin elevation when there is damage to your heart:

Troponin is a type of protein found in the muscles of your heart. Troponin isn't normally found in the blood. When heart muscles become damaged, troponin is sent into the bloodstream. As heart damage increases, greater amounts of troponin are released in the blood

What the study shows is that nearly everyone is getting a little heart damage when they get the COVID vaccine, some get a lot more damage than others.

[Navigator]

I don't know if people have seen this yet, but Dictator Xi just had the previous CCP ruler, Hu Jintao, FORCEABLY REMOVED from the stand during the ongoing CCP congress.

The message seems pretty clear. "No-one is immune. No-one is untouchable. I wield life/death power over ALL in China."

This article has video of it happening:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -seat.html

[Cool Breeze]

Thanks, Navigator.
I have been trying to tell that to BB but it is like talking to a brick wall.

It's worse, and that's why it is useless. But people who employ logic cannot understand the rebellion and spiritual disease of those who refuse to use it, so they keep presuming these same people will all of a sudden understand its use and its application to the realities of the world. As Bish has demonstrated, proving my point, it is impossible. Unless a 180 and repentance occurs. But then, he'd be by definition a conservative, the thing he claims is bad and all the names he calls - sorta funny how that is.

The lefties act like they don't apply "religion" on other people, which is hysterical in its nature. They use political power and the force of others (courts, "law' and LEOs) to demand all sorts of things, mandate others, and even groom or publicly display sexual degeneracy. People with love of human beings and the rights and freedoms of others would never do this. Yet the Bishes of the world believe they don't do exact what they accuse others of. Why? Their belief system is a lie and the founder of it, the Father of Lies. Notice that they have to use others (typically conservative people) as the strongmen to enforce their fraudulent system, since they themselves are weaklings and can't hack it in the "real world." Ironic how these things work.

[Bob Butler]

The lefties act like they don't apply "religion" on other people, which is hysterical in its nature...

This is of course a gross and deliberate misunderstanding of the progressive position. If you can’t comprehend or criticize another person’s worldview, you make something up and present it as belonging to others. All I can say is swing and a miss.

It is possible to have a conservative view which clings to older values which have proven useful over the years. Such can be respected, but it assumes there is nothing new under the sun. There is a 'new birth of freedom' that occurs with every crisis. Equality, freedom and containment are among the important values introduced.

But you have to reject the flaws, a new set of them every crisis. Trump has a lot of flaws, including insurrection, criminality, autocracy, violence, F***ing around, etc…. If you decline to reject the flaws, you have bought them. It would be easy to reject them, but people here would seemingly rather ignore Trump’s ill behavior. It is more common to see respectable jews, blacks, latinos, asians or other non whites rejected while obvious serious immorality is accepted.

But progressives (or myself at least) do distinguish between religion and government. I would rather the two not be confused, that neither force one person’s culture on another with either government or religion, and one is free to practice one’s own culture or religion period. The exceptions would be variation of some of the basic Ten Commandments: thou shalt not murder, lie, steal, etc…. In Trumps case, he would have to give up insurrections, speaking and doing business.

And, no, the system does not depend on the Father of Lies, conservatives, autocrats or frauds. Those are religious or conservative habits. It is hardly surprising you are familiar with them.

[FullMoon]

I don't know if people have seen this yet, but Dictator Xi just had the previous CCP ruler, Hu Jintao, FORCEABLY REMOVED from the stand during the ongoing CCP congress.

The message seems pretty clear. "No-one is immune. No-one is untouchable. I wield life/death power over ALL in China."

This article has video of it happening:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -seat.html

It was very unusual, for sure. Just as the foreign press began filming this happened. Then it was blocked in mainland China and they don't know about it. Also, Jiang Zemin, Hu's predecessor and known to have yielded power through Hu, was NOT invited to the meeting, which is a big deal in and of itself. The manner in which it was performed does indicate your conclusion as the probable motive. No report of it leaves it up for interpretation and maybe that was the intended purpose?

[Guest]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX-2JgEsSA8&t=111s[/youtube]

[Navigator]

I don't know if people have seen this yet, but Dictator Xi just had the previous CCP ruler, Hu Jintao, FORCEABLY REMOVED from the stand during the ongoing CCP congress.

The message seems pretty clear. "No-one is immune. No-one is untouchable. I wield life/death power over ALL in China."

This article has video of it happening:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -seat.html

It was very unusual, for sure. Just as the foreign press began filming this happened. Then it was blocked in mainland China and they don't know about it. Also, Jiang Zemin, Hu's predecessor and known to have yielded power through Hu, was NOT invited to the meeting, which is a big deal in and of itself. The manner in which it was performed does indicate your conclusion as the probable motive. No report of it leaves it up for interpretation and maybe that was the intended purpose?

The empty chair next to Xi the rest of the day probably spoke for itself in China.