Higgenbotham wrote: ↑Mon Mar 06, 2023 10:18 am
Higgenbotham wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 12:28 pm
True competence in America matters not a whit. It's all about waddling up to the window for a bailout.
Higgenbotham wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:14 pm
Technical competence doesn't matter in this society - that's why Obama got elected.
It's all about the waddle. Can the tech companies do the waddle this weekend? It's not about technical competence, even at tech companies. Anybody with any brains at all would not have had their money in that bank. Right here, right now, this weekend, it all comes down to how well they can waddle up to the window for their bailout. Can the lords of tech waddle like the lords of finance?
Bailout talk roils Washington after Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse
Story by Jeff Stein, Tony Romm • 1h ago
Federal officials faced growing pressure Saturday to bail out even the biggest customers of the collapsed Silicon Valley Bank, igniting a ferocious political debate over Washington’s role in tamping down potential threats to the broader U.S. financial sector.
Bailout talk roils Washington after Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse
Tech executives, former government officials and at least two Democratic lawmakers called for safeguarding depositors with money at stake in the collapse if a buyer for the bank’s assets isn’t found by Monday, arguing that it’s the only way to limit a cascade of bigger problems.
Companies that did business with Silicon Valley Bank are already warning that the bank’s failure may force thousands of layoffs or furloughs, and prevent many workers from receiving their next paycheck.
Some experts worry that large numbers of companies could move to transfer their money from regional banks similar to SVB to safer giant commercial banks Monday, leading to a fresh round of destabilization.
A move to make Silicon Valley Bank’s depositors whole without a buyer would probably require Congress to pass legislation drawing on an insurance fund paid into by all banks and backed by U.S. taxpayers — a fund that typically only covers deposits up to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s limit of $250,000. But more than 90 percent of SVB’s accounts were over that limit. Critics of using the fund to help larger depositors argue that it would establish a troubling precedent, leading other banks in similar circumstances to expect federal authorities to swoop in and save them as well.
That could lead to a backlash, in an echo of the fury directed at government rescue measures for Wall Street during the 2008 financial crisis. But this time taxpayers would be bailing out the would-be lords of tech rather than the lords of finance.
Another possibility is that larger Wall Street banks, fearing wider contagion, acquire what’s left of SVB and make all of its depositors whole. That could be a tricky bet, however, and bigger banks might ask for the federal government’s help before agreeing to a potentially unprofitable purchase.
“All the choices are bad choices,” said Simon Johnson, an economist at MIT who previously served as chief economist of the International Monetary Fund. “You don’t want to extend this kind of bailout to people. But if you aren’t doing that, you face a run of really big — and really hard to predict — proportions.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compani ... a38d&ei=25
Higgenbotham wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 7:00 pm
aeden wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 1:24 pm
Closed all shorts today and will go nappy time as 32.4% in 90 day tbills as the sweeps continue.
I also have no positions as of today's close.
Right, because I knew they would get themselves in a position to waddle, eventually, but, once in their waddling position, it's too hard to know what happens. It's a lottery economy, after all.
But 89% of the bank's $175 billion in deposits were uninsured as the end of 2022, according to the FDIC, and their fate remains to be determined.
https://www.reuters.com/business/financ ... 023-03-10/
Their fate gets determined by the waddle in the lottery economy. Hell of a way to run a country (into the ground).
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.