Religion and Vaccine Arguments

[tim]

https://americanmilitarynews.com/2023/0 ... -practice/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/more-s ... r-AA1fK372

https://www.thesun.ie/sport/football/11 ... -suddenly/

https://advocate-la.newsmemory.com/?pub ... 5e_134acc8

https://trmlx.com/student-pilot-goes-in ... elicopter/

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/buckland- ... MYKPSVD7M/

https://english.mathrubhumi.com/news/nr ... -1.8839926

https://www.wiltshirelive.co.uk/news/wi ... an-8691243

https://www.oneindia.com/bengaluru/week ... 12261.html

[tim]

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/the-covenant-of-death

We learned in DailyClout’s Report 69 that Pfizer knew that they were killing babies in utero and that they knew they were making nursing newborns, born to vaccinated moms, severely ill. And they proceeded to urge this mRNA injection on pregnant women. As did The New York Times (which, I gather, is running a hit piece on me shortly, surely coincidentally). As did Dr Rochelle Walensky, who told all the pregnant women in America to get an mRNA injection three days after Pfizer concluded that it was a factor in the aborting of two babies.

The first tranche of the Moderna papers came out in July, due to another successful lawsuit by hero/lawyer Aaron Siri. And we learned that Moderna, too, had been experimenting on destroying the fertility cycles of female mammals.

So the goal – at least one primary goal – of all of this madness and evil of the past three years, whatever brand you chose, was to ruin women’s menses and to damage human reproduction at a global level. Team Pfizer or Team Moderna? A distinction without a difference.

And now the PR campaign for “the new variant” is on – predictably, as the advisory group for the FDA recommended in advance of their even existing, that future boosters for variants should be approved – and the AI that now rules journalism, is pushing out scary stories on schools that are sending kids home, on universities such as Rutgers that won’t allow students back on campus unless they are injected with this new formulation with its lack of longterm double-blind safety data – on the return of masks. All of this is entirely connected to the 89% drop in manufacturing demand that Pfizer reported and the tanking of Moderna’s share values.[1] Why pause the gravy train? Dead babies be damned.

I also needed a brief rest because I had to process what Dr James Thorp told me: doctors who treat the most vulnerable population in the world – pregnant women and their unborn babies – were – are – coerced to lie by organizations that oversee these doctors, that were paid to lie.

I interviewed fetal-maternal medicine specialist Dr James Thorp recently; he has been one of the very few medical providers for pregnant women and babies, to have raised the alarm about massive damage to women and babies via the mRNA injection. The interview, in a transcript below that I have edited for clarity, is one of the most important exchanges of our time.

In this interview, Dr Thorp describes how he was unceremoniously if not injuriously fired by his health system employer - though he was among the most published of his colleagues. He described the results of a FOIA launched by his wife, attorney Maggie Thorp, and himself, that revealed $13 billion in funding to “influencers” to promote the mRNA injections, including surfacing a contract with a for-profit OB/GYN NGO that oversees tens of thousands of obstetricians and gynecologists on two continents. The contract that the Thorps’ FOIA disclosed, provides for the return of the money if medical organizations do not adhere to the “safe and effective” for pregnant women and new moms script presented to them by HHS. Dt Thorp independently confirms the WarRoom/DailyClout’s findings now from three other independent sources: that placentas, fetuses and newborns are being damaged by the mRNA injection. All four sources confirm the same kinds of damage: fibrins, blood clots, “small for dates” restricted growth and weight of the placentas, and calcifications. Meaning that babies of vaccinated moms in utero may not be getting enough food, and they may lack the room to grow normally.

Dr Thorp ends with the damning but unforgettable conclusion that every OB/GYN should have known in advance that this injection would cause massive damage to women and babies, because inflammation has been known to OB/GYNs for decades to be catastrophic to pregnancy.

Please read, and widely share, this interview that discloses an existential threat to the future of humanity:

“Dr. Naomi Wolf:

Hey everyone. It's Dr. Naomi Wolf. I'm here with one of my personal heroes, Dr. James Thorp. Welcome Dr. Thorp.

Dr James Thorp:

Thank you, Dr. Wolf. It's an honor and a privilege to work with you.

Dr. Wolf:

Thank you. Dr. Thorp is a distinguished, board-certified obstetrician gynecologist and maternal-fetal medicine physician. He has over 44 years of obstetrical experience while serving as a very busy clinician his whole career. He's also been very active in clinical research. This just goes to show that the people who are the bravest dissidents are some of the most credentialed.

Dr. Thorp has 224 publications, including 28 on COVID 19. He has seen over 27,500 high risk pregnancies in the last 4.5 years, served as a reviewer for major medical journals, and served on the board of directors for the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine for three years. He also served as an examiner for the American Board of OB/GYN. He served in the US Air Force. Thank you for your service.

Dr. Thorp testified in the US Senate under the Bush Administration in 2003 on treating the fetus with in-utero therapies. He testified in the Senate more recently with Senator Ron Johnson and others. Dr. Thorpe has focused his research efforts on the Covid 19 pandemic and published over 32 scientific publications, and a book documenting the dangers of the mRNA vaccine to women of reproductive age and to pregnancy.

Dr. Thorp, given all the credentials that I've just shared, there's no way anyone can call you a marginal person in the world of maternal-fetal medicine. You're a peer reviewer. You've overseen thousands of high-risk pregnancies. You've also been way out front as the first obstetrician-gynecologist to raise an alarm about the harms to women and babies from the mRNA vaccines. You've been relentless.

Also, you've been in the news recently for having been punished for your courage and your accuracy. Please share with us what the latest is.

Dr Thorp:

Sure. I was recently fired. All of the patients in my prior service area were under the Sisters of St. Mary's Health System, one of the largest Catholic health systems in the country. They're based in St. Louis, as well as in service areas in five different states. I worked in two different states for them: Missouri and Illinois. What I want to say to your listeners and to my former patients – to all patients globally -- is this: the most important question you need to ask your nurse or your doctor, whether it's in a hospital or in an office, is: Nurse, Doctor, are you willing to lose your job to save my life?

And they must answer that. Because I'm telling you that 95% of the physicians and nurses are captured by their paycheck.

What happened at S S M Health? I was a model physician there, as described by the CEO who fired me. I got a call from Mr. Kevin Elledge, a CEO at SSM. (NW: SSM’s motto is:
“Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of God.”)

He scheduled a call with me, allegedly just to meet me. I was very suspicious of this. So, of course, I had an attorney. I took copious notes. The conversation was on June 29th at 1:05 pm.

The conversation lasted 45 minutes. For 30 minutes, Mr. Elledge honored me: called me a model physician for the system, didn't quite understand why they were having to fire me, except they were having financial difficulties. But multiple sources in the system tell me that I was the number one money producer for the system in the department.

Several have told me that I'm the number one researcher and publisher in the department and have published more than most of the rest of the department combined.

[Mr Elledge] honored me as being of unparalleled ethical, moral, and intellectual integrity. These are words that that he used. And after 30 minutes of this, he said, “We need to terminate you. And we're invoking the no cause termination, which is in your original contract. So we'll give you 120 days. You can continue to work and wind down your practice, but you need to take this large sum of money and sign the documents that I'm going to send you.”

I didn't even see the documents. I said, “Obviously I want you to continue your mission. I don't want your money. I don't need your money, so please just keep it and try to make ends meet and try to take care of my patients as best you can. “

He got progressively threatened as he kept trying to force me to sign that document, which he hadn't even sent me yet. I was very kind and respectful to him and just said, “No, I'm not [signing it]. I don't want your money. I don't need the money.”

He said, “Just look at it. You have the option of working for another 120 days.” That conversation ended at 1:57 PM.

He sent out an email to the entire system firing me, saying, Dr. Thorp is, effective, immediately, not seeing patients.

Which is really a slam. And very injurious. It's libel, because that [implies] that I'm a horrible person – that I did something horrible to one of my patients or to one of the staff, and everybody knows that's not the case.

Were flabbergasted. And I'm locked out of the system. And that's behind me.

You know as a woman of faith, that when Yahweh closes one door, he's got much bigger plans for you.

[In terms of SSM], I think they mean well, but I think they're captured by the system. The people up there love me. I don't think that it was their decision. In my opinion, somebody came in, -- from the swamp in DC or from one of the medical boards or one of the organizations that I've been attacking -- and said, “Thorp's got to go. He's getting too loud.”

Dr. Wolf:

I may be cynical, but I'm hearing that that call began in a friendly and flattering way, because the goal of the institution was to get you to sign a non-disclosure agreement, which I'm guessing is the unseen document that they never bothered to send you because you said you wouldn't accept it.

Dr Thorp:

They ended up sending it to me. My wife's an attorney. Maggie [Thorp] looked at it, and she's never seen such an extensive non-disclosure agreement. it went not only to the effect of non-disparagement, but [also stated that] I would've been responsible for any other independent source -- like you, or somebody on Twitter -- that was disparaging them for what they did, and [it would have] held me responsible for that.

Dr. Wolf:

So, thank God for Maggie Thorp. This is just one more piece in the puzzle of trying to criminalize the speech of people like you and me, or to entangle us in lawfare if we tell people the truth. The other piece of this story that I find super concerning is that they were trying to buy your silence.

You don't have to disparage your former employers, but I will. As a woman and as a mom, I'm just thinking of all the women who were your patients who suddenly got an email saying their doctor is gone, or who were informed by whoever took your place, that their doctor is gone.

If you have any patients who are pregnant, it would be incredibly concerning to be left in the middle of one’s pregnancy without an obstetrician. I do agree with you that it's libelous or defamatory that this email went out, because it does appear to smear your reputation. Dr Peter McCullough has also had to fight legal battles. Dr Sherri Tenpenny’s license was suspended. One of our Pfizer documents analysis volunteers, Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan in Australia, was also threatened by a licensing board there. Doctors who tell the public the truth are being menaced with “lawfare” or threats of losing their licenses.

Dr Thorp:

Dr Renata Moon was just fired too. Dr. Moon had an academic appointment and was a very valuable employee. What they did to her was worse. They drummed up totally fraudulent allegations and fired her for cause. They smeared her.[2]

Many if not most of the hospitals are doing that. Dr. Rennie Moon is an incredible pediatrician and has testified in the Senate with me and with Dr. McCullough and many others. She has a very prominent voice. Pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology are the most brainwashed, targeted groups of all of medicine.

Dr. Wolf:

Let me go to why you're such a threat. You were early on confirming what we [the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers] were also finding at the same time: damage to women's reproductive systems, reproductive cycles, damage to babies in utero, and damage to the placenta via the mRNA injections.

I want you to talk about the calcified placentas that you were seeing.[3] Is there anything new or different in the kinds of pregnancies, you were seeing, anything new regarding placentas or the babies themselves, any change in outcomes regarding deaths of mothers in childbirth [which are up post-years of mrna vaccination by 30%, per CDC], that you've seen?[4]

Dr Thorp:

You're a hundred percent right. This entire vaccine went after women. It went after women's health. for two reasons.

Number one: Every man and woman in medicine knows women make all the healthcare decisions for all members of the family. So that if they could capture the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and 60,000 obstetricians, and then they got all the women, they captured the population.

The second issue is more ominous if they can fraudulently - and make no doubt about it, this was fraud, right? Conspiracy, this was collusion -- a RICO violation. The second reason that they targeted women is this: if they can prove that the vaccine is safe, effective, and necessary in the most vulnerable population, which is pregnant women, pre-borns and newborns by vertical transmission -- then every other human being on earth needs to be vaccinated.

Number one, women make the healthcare decisions. Number two, if we can convince the world that it's safe, effective, and necessary in pregnancy, they've won the entire game for vaccinating the entire human population on the planet. And that's what they did.

Maggie [Thorp], as I mentioned, is an attorney. She has a keen eye for sniffing out fraud in larger corporations, which she’s done in other industries successfully.

So, we launched a FOIA. We strongly suspected that this vaccine, just like I got done saying, was a fait accompli. It was always pre-planned. Prior to 2020, it was pre-planned to target women.

And we proved that this was the case.

We submitted an airtight Freedom of Information Act to HHS, the CDC, and the American College of OB/GYN, and ACOG.

ACOG and the American College of OB/GYN allege themselves to be the preeminent organization for women in the world. Nothing could be more opposite to the truth.

On February 28th, 2021, the Pfizer 5.3 0.6 post-marketing data was public. It was devastating. It was proven to be, according to Pfizer, the deadliest drug ever rolled out to the human public. I've been saying that. And for two and a half years, not one person has challenged me. 1,223 dead within 10 weeks, and then horrible obstetrical data.

Mark Weber, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs/Human Services at U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, tried to hide that damning data for 75 years. What did he do? Rolled out a $13 billion PSYOPs campaign to the entire United States of America, about 300 major organizations in influencers, including synagogues and churches, and many others, to convince the United States and the entire world that this deadly shot was safe, effective, and necessary in the most vulnerable population, pregnant women.[5]

They rolled that $13 billion out while suppressing the damning data from Pfizer.

Those who were founding members, like the American College of OBGYN, signed a contract, Naomi.

We've proven that [from] 1400 pages. They redacted over 50%, but they entered a contract that I have termed, the “covenant of death” [the phrase is from Isaiah 28]. I have started a Substack, on this covenant of death between HHS and CDC, and the American College of OB/GYN along with probably all the other influencers.

[NW: Isaiah 28:14 reads:

“Therefore hear the word of the Lord, you scoffers
who rule this people in Jerusalem.
15 You boast, “We have entered into a covenant with death,
with the realm of the dead we have made an agreement.
[…]
for we have made a lie our refuge
and falsehood our hiding place.”’]

What's in this covenant of death? This is hideous. This is horrifying. This is exactly what you have seen, Dr. Naomi, and what I've seen and what we know to be true.

They took well over $11 million; they signed the covenant with death, and they're not allowed to deviate one iota from the lethal narrative of HHS. If they do, they will be liable for paying back every single penny, which they've already pocketed. So, that's why the American College of OB/GYN, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, to this day, are the evil organizations that perpetrated this crime on the world. And I will not back down from attacking them because we have the proof.

I've been saying this for over a year. And if that were not true, I'd be involved multiple lawsuits.

Dr. Wolf:

if I understood what you just said, it's a huge story.

You and your wife submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to HHS, and you have, as a result, secured a lengthy contract between HHS and influencers, including the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Do I have those facts correct?

Dr Thorp:

Not quite. Almost. We have 1400 pages of communications between the federal government and the American College of OBGYN, that oversees over 60,000 obstetrician gynecologists on two different continents.

Dr. Wolf:

This is a huge story. So how do you know there are 300 influencers that HHS has also funded? Are they mentioned in this communication?

Dr Thorp:

Yes, we have. They're all mentioned. And that's well known. Assistant Deputy Secretary, Mark Weber of HHS was very proud of this newly endowed COVID 19 Community Corps.

Dr. Wolf:

I'm aware that influences were funded, but it sounds like you and your wife got the receipts in certain ways and, and these emails are unbelievably important. Now, you've, you are also saying that $11 million went from the federal government, from HHS to this third party NGO, a for-profit, non-government organization, which oversees tens of thousands of obstetricians and gynecologists on two continents. Do I have that correct?

Dr Thorp:

That's correct.

Dr Wolf:

So presumably, if they don't stick to HH s's script about the vaccine, they must pay back the money that they took. Is that correct?

Dr Thorp:

Absolutely correct. It is HHS and CDC.

Dr. Wolf:

Our volunteers found that a terrifying report went out on April 10th, 2021, showing damage in utero from transplacental or “maternal” exposure to vaccine, Pfizer's words, including death. There are also convulsions and fevers and swelling of babies who are nursing vaccinated moms.[6] This report went to CDC, and three days later, Dr. Walensky gave a White House press conference telling the women of America, that especially if they were pregnant, they should take the vaccine; that it was safe and effective, that there was no bad time. Before you have your baby, during your pregnancy, after having your baby, there is no bad time to take the vaccine.

So CDC was paying obstetricians to echo this script, knowing that this injection was killing babies in utero, and poisoning them through breast milk? Is that the bottom line?

Dr Thorp:

That's absolutely a hundred percent. We've arrived at the identical conclusions, and you know, Maggie and I have published extensively on America out Loud. There are a dozen articles, and they're extraordinarily well referenced. We have everything that you said. It is a hundred percent true, and everything that you found from your side that I wasn't aware of it, it is absolutely a hundred percent true. We’ve documented it all.

We have clips, we have interviews; we have the Walensky interview, we have the floating lie that was put out by the powers that be in our government. And, and the American College of OBGYN starting out in late 2020 [saying], It's never going to be mandated in pregnancy. And then it slowly morphs from that into the April 2021 interview where [she] says, okay, it is now indicated. And we were mandating it. And by July, ACOG said, yes, we're strongly recommending it.

Dr. Naomi Wolf:

That's unbelievable. I will move heaven and earth to get proper media attention on this story that you and Maggie Thorp have broken.

Let me just play this out to the end. This means that to this day, when a pregnant woman asks her obstetrician, her gynecologist, “Do you recommend that I take this [mRNA] vaccine or not?” That doctor has to say, “Yes, it's recommended”? “Yes, ACOG recommends it”? Or else they are in violation in some way of some contractual commitment that ACOG has made, and they must pay back money or be penalized in some ways? Is that right?

Dr Thorp:

That's, that's exactly right. And, and the system will work earnestly to fire that physician if they perpetrate that truth.

Dr. Naomi Wolf:

So, you are saying that obstetricians and gynecologists, to this day, at least in the United States, cannot give their pregnant patients informed consent about what we now know to be the real significant risks of taking the URA injection during pregnancy. Is that correct?

Dr Thorp:

Absolutely. A hundred percent correct. And, and just think about it, the Mark Weber infiltrated the personal most personal relationships that a woman has. :

Going into the examination room, during the most important part of her life -- she's pregnant -- she trusts her physician. With her obstetrician, whether male or female, there's a very important trust. Mark Weber and HHS egregiously violated that trust, in the most sensitive exam ever in a woman's life.

Dr. Wolf:

So theoretically -- even though now people are fleeing the mRNA injection, as we now know from the Q1 and Q 2 economic reports of both Pfizer and Moderna - pregnant women to this day probably are being urged to take the mRNA vaccine that everyone else is racing away from. And they're doing it because they trust their obstetricians and their gynecologists.

We need to bring every woman's attention to this story that every woman in America -- in all those other countries where this is happening. Every pregnant woman is in a state of acute jeopardy as a result of what you and Mrs. Thorp have found. What were you seeing in your practice regarding harms to women and to the fetus from this injection?

Dr Thorp:

In my vast clinical experience, I have seen massive disruption of normal menstruation patterns, which you well know. And that did not occur until after the rollout of the vaccine. I have seen a marked increase in infertility, male and female.

If the [couple] do conceive, then there's a substantial risk of miscarriage. And I stand by what we [both] have interpreted and what I have published, there's an 81% risk of miscarriage from Pfizer's own data. There is an increase in malformations of all organ systems, a substantial increase in fetal death, substantial increase in severe early onset preeclampsia, in preterm premature membrane rupture, an increase in spontaneous preterm labor, an increase in indicated preterm delivery due to vaccine complications. In trying to prevent a death in utero, we are seeing an increase in cardiac anomalies, cardiac malformations, and in the early death of the fetus. I am also seeing an increase in premature delivery and death of the newborns. Therte is a massive increase in newborns going to the neonatal intensive care unit. There are substantial abnormalities of the placenta.

Dr. Naomi Wolf:

Stunning, terrifying. Dr. Thorp is, in his interpretation of over 80% spontaneous abortions and miscarriages in the Pfizer documents independently finding what our WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers also found in the Pfizer documents. And his description of compromised placentas, stillbirth, premature labor, and babies with malformations is independently confirmed by, and I stress this as a journalist, two midwives in two separate practices, whom we at DailyClout interviewed. Dr Thorp’s account also confirms a new report out by DailyClout’s COO Amy Kelly, showing placental problems in a pathology report of a vaccinated mother. So now we have four independent sources confirming the same serious problems for babies and moms.

Dr Thorp:

Everybody should have known I knew, before the vaccine ever rolled out: that it was going to be damaging. That's because it is a proven principle of obstetrics in gynecology and maternal-fetal medicine, published by the world expert Roberto Romero, on the horrible adverse effects of inflammation on pregnancy. It's devastating.

So that's known to every OB/GYN. Every OB/GYN has had that drummed into their teaching for the last several decades.

So of course, [the inflammation caused by the mRNA vaccines] is going to cause damage: miscarriage and malformations and chromosome malformations. It’s proven: it's the most inflammatory substance ever used in a human being.

Dr. Wolf:

It's been known for 10 years at least that lipid nanoparticles biodistribute to every organ in the human body, and that they disrupt human reproductive capacity.

So someday, I hope that the people who formulated this injection with lipid nanoparticles will answer before Congress, if not before a jury of their peers, the question: “Why did you put this in this injection if you knew it would destroy human reproductive capacity?”

Dr. Thorp, thank God, you and your few but brave colleagues who care enough about women and babies to save lives by telling the truth. “

So there you are. We are hearing reports weekly of shrunken placentas; of babies born with breathing impairments exactly as Reort 69 showed Pfizer knew babies would be born; of placentas with calcifications; of placentas with blood clots; of babies with bizarre and appalling malformations.

Honestly, what can I say at this point except may God save us; and please tell childbearing age women everything you now know.

And please, please support the handful of brave doctors and scientists who alone will find preventions and treatments for the damage from the “covenant of death” – if preventions and treatments can be had.

Poor suffering humanity. Poor blameless babies.

[tim]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/0 ... l-funding/

HERE WE GO: Biden Regime Seeks Additional Funding for New COVID-19 Vaccine “That Works” – Warns Everyone Will Get It “No Matter Whether They’ve Gotten It Before or Not” (VIDEO)

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that InfoWars published insider information that alleges the TSA and US Border Patrol will be moving back to 2020-era COVID-19 mandates and restrictions starting in mid-September through mid-October, to include mask mandates on all flights. This is in addition to the confirmed mask-mandate reinstatement at Morris Brown College in Atlanta, GA, and Lionsgate Studios in Santa Monica, CA. Also, a school district in South Texas just outside of San Antonio closed down temporarily due to an ‘uptick’ in COVID cases.

That same week, WarRoom’s Natalie Winters uncovered millions of dollars in funding, awarded primarily to the Department of Veteran’s Affairs and DoD, to ramp up testing and other COVID-19 related.

This was just a week after the NIH appointed Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, a staunch advocate for masks, lockdowns, and vaccine mandates, as the replacement for Dr. Fauci.

To further the suggestion that another lockdown scare is in the forecast, on Tuesday, the US Department of Health and Human Services announced funding of $1.4 billion to “support the development of a new generation of tools and technologies to protect against COVID-19 for years to come” according to a press release.

“Project NextGen is a key part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to keeping people safe from COVID-19 variants,” said HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra. “These awards are a catalyst for the program – kickstarting efforts to more quickly develop vaccines and continue to ensure availability of effective treatments.”

Project NextGen, a $5 billion initiative led by ASPR’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) in partnership with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), coordinates across the federal government and the private sector to advance innovative vaccines and therapeutics into clinical trials, regulatory review, and potential commercial availability for the American people. The project builds on a better understanding of COVID-19 – with HHS developing, using, and constantly re-evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of current vaccines and therapeutics for over three years.

Recipients of the awards include:

$1 billion to four BARDA Clinical Trial partners to support vaccine Phase IIb clinical trial studies: ICON Government and Public Health Solutions, Inc of Hinckley, Ohio; Pharm-Olam, LLC, of Houston, Texas; Technical Resources Intl (TRI), Inc, of Bethesda, Maryland; and Rho Federal Systems, Inc., Durham, North Carolina.
$326 million to Regeneron to support the development of a next-generation monoclonal antibody for COVID-19 prevention.
$100 million to Global Health Investment Corp. (GHIC), the non-profit organization managing the BARDA Ventures investment portfolio to expand investments in new technologies that will accelerate responses in the future.
$10 million to Johnson & Johnson Innovation (JLABS) for a competition through Blue Knight, a BARDA-JLABS partnership.
The press release claims that their partnership with Regeneron will help develop a “novel monoclonal antibody that will protect people who do not respond to or cannot take existing vaccines,” despite their attempts to limit the distribution in Florida in 2021.

On Friday, Joe Biden announced that he plans to request more funding from Congress to develop a new COVID vaccine “that works.”

“I signed off this morning on a proposal we have to present to the Congress a request for additional funding for a new vaccine that is necessary, that works,” Biden told the reporters while vacationing in Lake Tahoe.

Biden warned that everyone will get it despite their previous vaccination status.

“It will likely be recommended that everybody get it no matter whether they’ve gotten it before or not,” he added.

[tim]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV3ObipKe0Y

More COVID fear mongering and hysteria will allow for more lockdowns and a way for the powers that be to classify the excessive deaths as being from the new variant.

[tim]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVd6IonyI0Y

Myocarditis, don't bother to report

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... es-return/

Politics — Not Science or Health — Behind Return of Mask Mandates, Critics Say

As some institutions this month called for the return of mask mandates, experts interviewed by The Defender cited studies showing masks are ineffective in preventing the spread of COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses, and warned of the harms masks pose to children.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... t-reports/

CDC Shuts Down V-safe App for Reporting COVID Vaccine Injuries, Former FDA Adviser Warns It’s a ‘Terrible Idea’

Former U.S. Food and Drug Administration adviser David Gortler, doctor of pharmacy, said ending the safety monitoring of a new vaccine still promoted for universal use is “unprecedented.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... nated-gmo/

To put some perspective on these numbers McKernan explains in terms of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for COVID-19:

“You were probably swabbed with one of those nasal swabs to get a Covid PCR. You would be called positive of a CT (cycle threshold) under 40. We’re getting CTs under 20 with the contamination of the vaccine.

“That’s a million-fold more contamination than you would be called positive for having a virus. Now, the virus they’re swabbing is outside of your mucosal membrane in your nose.

“We’re talking about a contaminant that’s getting injected, bypassing your mucosal defences at a million-fold higher concentrations…There’s an enormous difference here in terms of the amount of material it’s in there.”

The manufacturing process, as discussed in a recent BMJ article, points to how DNA contamination may have occurred. The clinical trials were run using “Process 1” which involved in vitro transcription of synthetic DNA — essentially a “clean” process.

However, this process is not viable for mass production, so the manufacturers switched to “Process 2” to dial things up. Process 2 involves using E. coli bacteria to replicate the plasmids.

Getting the plasmids out of the E coli. can be challenging and result in residual plasmids in the vaccines. But there’s another concern.

When plasmid contamination is found, there is a potential for bacterial endotoxin to also be present. This endotoxin can produce serious side effects if injected including anaphylaxis and septic shock.

Australian professor Geoff Pain remains most vocal providing extensive details on these endotoxins.

Sequencing of the plasmids from the Pfizer vials resulted in another “accidental” discovery. Something was found that wasn’t in the sequence map disclosed by Pfizer to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This something is called an SV40 promoter.

The SV40 promoter is a sequence that turns on gene expression, like a switch. It is also a potent nuclear localization signal, meaning it makes a beeline for the nucleus.

The entire SV40 genetic sequence came to infamous prominence in the 1960s having been found to have polluted the Salk polio vaccine, causing a subsequent surge in cancers. We’ll return to the concerning significance of the SV40 promoter sequence in a moment.

Subsequent experiments suggest that most of the DNA contamination is fragmented, which is by no means benign. McKernan states:

“Much of the DNA is actually linear because they do go through a step trying to fragment this and (linear DNA) has a higher propensity for integration than circular plasmid DNA.”

It seems that a significant amount of the DNA is in this form and presents a greater risk to humans in terms of risk for integration into the genome, than the circular DNA.

To make matters worse — as if things could get any worse — it appears that much of the DNA is packaged in the lipid nanoparticles (LNP).

“If the DNA is actually in the LNPs, we have different risks, as… this will then transfect the mammalian cells and become a genetic alteration. Now, whether it integrates with the genome is secondary, the fact that you’re getting foreign DNA into the cell is a risk in and of itself, because it could partially get expressed, or it could muddle around with other transcription, translation machinery that’s in there,” McKernan explains.

Let’s recap. We have DNA, which is mostly packaged in LNP and designed to travel all over the body and enter cells, delivering its genetic cargo like a trojan horse.

Some of this DNA may contain the SV40 promoter sequence — the one known to make a beeline to the nucleus and turn on gene expression.

McKernan states an obvious concern:

“If (the SV40 promoter) becomes integrated into the genome it will turn on gene expression wherever it lands. If this happens to be an oncogene (a cancer-causing gene), you’ve got problems.”

This dear reader, is only one of the many possible adverse effects of injecting synthetic DNA into humans.

The scientific literature acknowledges the potential for foreign/synthetic DNA alone to be oncogenic (cancer-causing), infectious and prothrombotic.

In addition, genomic integration of a viral promoter like SV40 can contribute to cancer and is well known to cause leukemia in gene therapy trials.

You can see why scientists are alarmed. These concerns were presented to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on June 16. What have they done with this information you ask? Probably filed it in a box somewhere in a deep dark warehouse between the words “conspicuous” and “conspire” is my guess.

[tim]

https://makismd.substack.com/p/video-ja ... us-disease

VIDEO - Japanese Infectious Disease specialist and Oncologist Dr.Masanori Fukushima (Kyoto University) testifies in Court about COVID-19 vaccine injuries and deaths in Japan

My take…
Japan has effectively mRNA poisoned most of its population with 382 million doses of mRNA administered. Consequently, it now has the highest excess deaths since World War II.

Thousands of Japanese citizens have died shortly after taking a COVID-19 vaccine but Japan’s Ministry of Health continues to conduct cover-ups of these deaths, even when pathologists have determined a causal link between the death and the vaccine.

https://makismd.substack.com/p/intervie ... -drwilliam

INTERVIEW - The New American - Dr.William Makis: mRNA and Turbo Cancers (aired Aug.23, 2023)

[tim]

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... -military/

The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) whistleblower who in March released a trove of data from a Pentagon medical database showing a spike in myocarditis cases in the military in 2021, following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, went public this week.

Lt. Ted Macie, an active-duty Navy medical service corps officer, also revealed new data on COVID-19 vaccine injuries among service members and called on lawmakers to hold the Pentagon accountable.

In a Sept. 1 tweet, Macie asked Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) to “call for accountability from the Pentagon over the tens of thousands of injuries and untold amount of deaths from the illegal shot mandate.”

Macie’s new data are the latest in ongoing revelations from whistleblowers regarding DMED data that revealed an increase since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout of miscarriages, cancer, neurological disorders and other medical conditions.

In early 2022, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) asked the DOD if it had reviewed the data showing big spikes in illnesses among military members since the vaccines were rolled out.

Johnson also asked if the military removed reports of vaccine-induced myocarditis from its official database.

Claiming the DMED data for 2016-2020 were incorrect, the DOD in early 2022 temporarily disabled the database and then updated it with what military officials said were more accurate figures.

The new data showed fewer medical conditions potentially related to the vaccines.

Commenting on the DOD’s move, Dr. Robert Malone said:

“Although this database has apparently been managed for years by the same National Institutes of Health subcontractor, and has been included in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) datasets including those reviewed by the CDC’s COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) Work Group, the geniuses that have been managing it have never identified any issues before the whistleblowers grabbed this download.”

Malone, who reviewed some of the raw DMED data released by the whistleblowers, added:

“There are many potential confounding variables, but whatever the cause, if these data are not due to longstanding and previously undiscovered ‘data corruption,’ then we have a major issue with the overall health of our armed services.”

Johnson in June 2022 asked the company that manages the DMED, Unissant Inc., to turn over records after it failed to fully comply with a previous request seeking information about its “awareness of potential data problems” with the military’s database.

For more than a year, Johnson has exchanged correspondence with the DOD regarding the DMED data. In July, Johnson sent another letter to the Pentagon asking if any service members had experienced adverse medical conditions associated with the COVID-19 vaccines.

“If so, how many and what are those conditions? How did DoD make this determination?” he wrote. “Has DoD conducted any independent investigation into whether adverse medical conditions are associated with the COVID-19 vaccines? If so, what has DoD found? If not, why not?”

Johnson told the DOD that their “pattern of deception regarding DMED data is unacceptable.”

The Defender reached out to Johnson’s office about receiving a reply from the DOD but did not hear back before deadline.

[tim]

https://dailyclout.io/disqualifying-pro ... fizer-crf/

Report 82: Pfizer Clinical Trial Subject Dies Soon After Receiving One Dose of Moderna COVID Vaccine. Forty-Two Days Post-Mortem, Pfizer Staff Seem Unaware He Is Dead.

Case Report Form (CRF) for Pfizer clinical trial subject 10841470 offers readers an inside view of a subject’s (i.e., patient’s) experiences in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial, both when entering and then going through the clinical trial process. Pfizer captures each subject’s data from its first encounter with a patient through the end of his or her participation in the trial. What this CRF reveals is shocking:

A clearly unhealthy person was not excluded from the trial, which is at the investigator’s discretion.
Trial participants can easily receive non-Pfizer COVID vaccines and choose to report them…or not.
Subject chose to get Moderna vaccine despite not knowing if he had received two doses of the Pfizer vaccine or the placebo.
Based on his knowledge at the time, he could have been receiving a third dose of an mRNA/LNP vaccine in under three months.
Onset of COVID only five days after receiving one dose of Moderna.
Hospitalization with severe COVID, requiring monoclonal antibodies, only eight days after one dose of Moderna.
Mechanical ventilation two days after entering hospital.
Death 20 days after Moderna Dose 1.
Documentation in the CRF does not support multi-organ dysfunction syndrome as primary cause of death or earlier diagnosis of acute renal failure.
Subject is unblinded – i.e., documented has being a Pfizer placebo patient, not a vaccine patient – three days post-mortem.
Pfizer personnel change data in the CRF after his death, including his September 30, 2020, answers to the inclusion/exclusion questions.
Pfizer gave him Dose 1 and Dose 2 without having documented whether or not he was HIV positive or negative.
Pfizer documents his reason for discontinuation from the trial as being “death,” when it should have been documented as protocol deviations.
Is it fraud to misrepresent the real reason for discontinuation?
Forty-two days after subject’s death, Pfizer personnel still seem unaware of his death, despite it being documented in the CRF on January 19, 2021.
At that time, on February 22, 2021, personnel write that he was unblinded to be assessed for receiving Dose 3 (the Pfizer vaccine).

https://dailyclout.io/23-percent-of-vac ... ates-died/

Report 83: 23% of Vaccinated Mothers’ Fetuses or Neonates Died. Suppressed Lactation and Breast Milk Discoloration Reported.

Important points from this report include:

Pfizer’s BNT162b2 mRNA COVID vaccine was not recommended for use in pregnancy or with lactation during the time of this post-marketing data set.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) did recommend COVID vaccination for pregnant and lactating women until April 23, 2021. [https://www.verywellhealth.com/pregnant ... ne-5092509]
Two hundred and seventy (270) pregnant women reported either “exposure” (146) or “vaccination” (124).
Exposure can mean unvaccinated women exposed to a vaccinated partner or exposed via inhalation or skin exposure to the vaccine.
Only a few “exposure cases” noted the timing of exposure during their pregnancies: 15 in the first trimester, seven in the second trimester, and two in the third trimester.
The timing of vaccination during the pregnancy was reported in just 22 of the 124 cases – 19 during the first trimester, one in the second trimester, and two in the third trimester.
In this group, 49 cases were rated non-serious, and 75 rated serious.
One mother had uterine contraction during pregnancy, and another had premature rupture of membranes.
Twenty-eight deaths of either a fetus or neonate happened to women in the vaccinated group (124 women). So, 23% of the vaccinated mothers had fetuses or newborns who died.
These “losses” were described as spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) or various other terms which mean death of the fetus or baby.
No outcome or “outcome pending” was reported for 243 of the 274, or 88.7%, of the pregnancy cases.
Because of this, it is unknown if 243 of the pregnancy cases resulted in normal or abnormal outcomes.
Only 11.3% of pregnancies had known outcomes.
There were five serious clinical events in four babies: two fetal growth retardation, two premature babies, and one neonatal death.
Four breast feeding mothers reported suppressed lactation, one of which was considered serious and also involved “paresis,” a weakness (less than complete paralysis) usually of an arm or leg.
Breast milk discoloration was also reported by breast feeding mothers.
Clinical events were only listed if they occurred in more than five cases. How many in this important section went unreported?
Many non-serious and serious were not separated but reported together, so it is unknown which of the following symptoms or combination of symptoms were responsible for the remaining 40+ serious clinical cases:
Thirty-three (33) headache, 24 vaccination site pain, 22 pain in extremity, 22 fatigue, 16 myalgia (muscle aches), 16 pyrexia (fever), 13 chills, 12 nausea, 11 pain, nine arthralgia (joint aches), seven lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes), six chest pain, six dizziness, six asthenia (weakness or lack of energy), and five malaise.
Two other clinical events were included: seven drug ineffective (defined as getting COVID between 14 days after the first shot and six days after the second shot) and five COVID-19 (presumably infection more than a week after the second injection, in other words failure of full immunization).
One hundred and thirty-three (133) breast feeding baby cases were reported.
One hundred and sixteen (116) simply reported exposure but no adverse reaction.
Seventeen (17) adverse reactions were reported, three classified as serious and 14 as non-serious.
Breast feeding babies’ reactions included:
Pyrexia (fever), rash, infant irritability, infantile vomiting, diarrhea, insomnia, illness, poor feeding infant, lethargy, abdominal discomfort, vomiting, allergy to vaccine, increased appetite, anxiety, crying, poor quality sleep, eructation (burping), agitation, pain, and urticaria (hives).
There is a stark contrast in the cases shown in Pfizer’s Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review and the pregnancy and lactation cases reported in 5.3.6, which is surprising given that the bulk of inoculations reflected in the Cumulative Review likely occurred during the period of time included in 5.3.6.
Pfizer’s Cumulative Report documents 53 spontaneous abortions and two premature births with neonatal death, compared to 26 and two, respectively, documented in 5.3.6.
Pfizer’s Cumulative Report reported 41 baby/infant cases exposed via breastmilk who had adverse events, with 10 of the cases experiencing serious adverse events. Yet, the comparable figures from 5.3.6 Table 6 were 17 cases and three serious cases.
Why are there twice as many spontaneous abortions in Pfizer’s Cumulative Report? Why does the Cumulative Report have so many more baby cases with adverse and serious adverse events?

[tim]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/nfl/a ... ttack.html

https://www.the-star.co.ke/sports/2023- ... -training/

https://medicotopics.com/trevor-broadwa ... ssed-away/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... state.html

https://www.newsletter.co.uk/sport/moto ... ss-4277827

https://www.insider.com/qatar-airways-p ... ays-2023-8

https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/8 ... h-updates/

https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelp ... 30823.html

https://www.thesun.ie/news/11216928/cov ... -teenager/

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ddenly-2de

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ddenly-664

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ddenly-e00

[tim]

https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/half-of-v ... never-stop

Half of Vaccinated People Never Stop Producing Spike Protein, Study Found
COVID Vaccine is a GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

Remember how we were told that “the vaccine stays in the arm” and that “harmless spike protein is only produced for a couple of days.” They said they were sure of that, despite no data to confirm their statements.

Well, sadly, it turns out that they lied to us. The data is now in, and it proves such claims wrong!

A clever scientific study by Brogna et al., just published, detected the presence of spike protein in COVID-vaccinated people six MONTHS after vaccination - and excluded the possibility of cross-contamination of experimental data with wild-circulating COVID infections.

What the Scientists Did
The study's authors used a sensitive test, called mass-spectrometry to detect a specific amino-acid sequence that exists only in the vaccine-induced spike protein.

To remind my readers, mRNA COVID vaccines contain genetic code to produce the so-called “spike protein,” a component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that allows the virus to penetrate and infect human cells. During the penetration process, called “fusion,” the viral spike protein changes shape, becoming a spear of sorts, penetrating the cell surface.

The only modification that both Pfizer and Moderna did was to “prefusion stabilize” the vaccine-encoded spike protein to prevent it from changing its shape and be more stable in the human body. (You can read more about it here).

The scientists decided to look for that specific, genetically modified protein component.

Experimental design: Mass spectrometry examination of biological samples was used to detect the presence of specific fragments of recombinant Spike protein in subjects who received mRNA-basedvaccines.

The replacement, using two proline amino acids, is referred to as “PP” by the study authors (PP stands for proline-proline). They are Italian and possibly did not realize that “PP” sounds naughty, so in most English literature, the sequence is called “2P”. Leaving kindergarten humor aside, the study authors zero in on the spike protein component that only exists in the COVID vaccine and does NOT occur in the naturally existing Sars-Cov-2 virus.

To be sure that their finding is not spurious, scientists included a control group of people who never received the COVID vaccines:

The study group, from southern Italy, was 40 subjects, 20 were vaccinated with the full cycle of mRNA vaccine as of April 2022, being part of the health sector, and 20 were unvaccinated with negativity for COVID-19 to nasopharyngeal test and with no titer of any antibodies. Other 20 unvaccinated persons were added that were positive for COVID-19.

The three groups were looked at.

It turns out that only the people in the vaccinated subgroup were found to carry vaccine-derived spike protein. What is worse, vaccine spike protein was found as late as six months after the last dose!

The specific PP-Spike fragment was found in 50% of the biological sample analyzed (Figures 1C–E and 2). This presence was independent of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titer. The antibody titers had a geometric mean of 629.86BAU/mL (Figure 1E). The minimum time PP-Spike was detected was 69 days after vaccination, while the maximum time was 187days. Allcontrols (samples from unvaccinated individuals) were negative. The control group (20 unvaccinated people) was also tested after contracting COVID-19 and was negative for PP-spike.

Nowhere does the study state that spike protein production ends after 187 days - the upper limit on time after vaccination was an artifact of the study design.