According to an online course schedule and catalog, this chemistry class has no final exam and goes from Jan. 8 to April 19, 2024.
RELATED: Teachers Conference Plots How To ‘Inspire Activism,’ Teach Critical Race Theory. Good luck body farm.
https://www.sandstonecare.com/blog/what ... ume%20lean
I rescind the observation two years to get them ready in college from the Professors.
In four years no prior knowledge of chemistry or African American studies is required for the college engagement.
In print.
Co-opted by postmodernist and deconstructionist ideologies.
Thank God I got my Wife away from the lunatics doing grad students college math homework then.
Total rot now as it appears is more than past conclusive.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... ax/572212/
I know someone who is experiencing FTD symptoms. His crack eyed meth kid just walked out on the Senate also.
Gee, how could inflation still be soaring?
Could the Fed Gov spending One Trillion dollars of new debt in just three months have anything to do with it?
Powell will morph into Burns guided by the FTD swamp meat puppet and on vacation 2.11 excuses also.
We will watch the 10 LEI as the uniparty eats its own in real time. His word was true they will be sealed and are. Decieved.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/02/19/be ... quite-bad/ bern logic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfFR2AnBciM
We seen that movie also as city for city.
Financial Topics avec aeden
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
PADims simply astroturf as many votes from Killadelphia they need.
next
next
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
Positive operating leverage and productivity growth from artificial intelligence should lead to margin expansion.
Throughout the year, however, there should be a few constants. Overall, U.S. equities are likely to have fair returns and better outcomes than European or emerging-market stocks. morg stan
Burn rate as the uniparty swamp whine as the fed kicks the market in dei crt brain dead pan with the terminal rate holding to past June.
Consumers crushed and ground to dust already from the repressionary Cantillon effect slaughter in the sticky wage cult deceptions
to local blow outs from ngo cult enablers still spewing 2.11 ratio. Vacated ass kissers. Fourth Turning Straussian reading.
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s542/cli ... That+Essay
Fair enough form the starboard view for now was noted.
An imperfect world.
What might work for investors in this imperfect world? Morgan Stanley strategists discussed:
Looking towards core fixed income, including government and investment-grade corporate debt. It is likely to be a good year for high-quality bonds as they continue to provide attractive yields, especially when compared against the risk/reward tradeoffs of other assets.
Considering Japanese stocks: Japanese policymakers have been an outlier among central banks, keeping interest rates low to boost growth.
Maintaining appropriate allocations to U.S. equities and cash: For the past two years, the outlook was gloomier for stocks in the U.S. than anywhere else in the world. However, 2024 is shaping up to be different as U.S. equities should notch better outcomes than European or emerging market equities, particularly as central bankers globally aim for target rates. Within the U.S., healthcare is forecast to outperform, and Morgan Stanley prefers industrials relative to other cyclical sectors.
Reducing allocations in emerging-market stocks and commodities: Allocations to emerging-market equities, EXCEPT Mexico and India, could be reduced. China’s lackluster growth will weigh on emerging markets broadly, and there is an added risk that its economy will get caught in a debt-deflation tailspin. By contrast, Mexico is likely to benefit from the post-pandemic near-shoring trend, while India is forecast to see superior growth in earnings per share compared with broader emerging markets
Reducing allocations in commodities: Oil is forecast to trade at relatively flat prices in 2024 and geopolitics remain a concern, while gold appears overvalued. Copper, which could outperform because of stronger-than-expected demand from China, may be an exception.
Investors should keep in mind that the markets have priced in the expectation that economic growth will go smoothly, and that central bankers will succeed in engineering a soft landing.
For those who read the white and black mouse of Tolstoy you can understand the condition.
An Eastern Fable from Leo Tolstoy's A Confession.
I will stay with the miry clay as we walk into what was already written long ago.
thread: amos
Throughout the year, however, there should be a few constants. Overall, U.S. equities are likely to have fair returns and better outcomes than European or emerging-market stocks. morg stan
Burn rate as the uniparty swamp whine as the fed kicks the market in dei crt brain dead pan with the terminal rate holding to past June.
Consumers crushed and ground to dust already from the repressionary Cantillon effect slaughter in the sticky wage cult deceptions
to local blow outs from ngo cult enablers still spewing 2.11 ratio. Vacated ass kissers. Fourth Turning Straussian reading.
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s542/cli ... That+Essay
Fair enough form the starboard view for now was noted.
An imperfect world.
What might work for investors in this imperfect world? Morgan Stanley strategists discussed:
Looking towards core fixed income, including government and investment-grade corporate debt. It is likely to be a good year for high-quality bonds as they continue to provide attractive yields, especially when compared against the risk/reward tradeoffs of other assets.
Considering Japanese stocks: Japanese policymakers have been an outlier among central banks, keeping interest rates low to boost growth.
Maintaining appropriate allocations to U.S. equities and cash: For the past two years, the outlook was gloomier for stocks in the U.S. than anywhere else in the world. However, 2024 is shaping up to be different as U.S. equities should notch better outcomes than European or emerging market equities, particularly as central bankers globally aim for target rates. Within the U.S., healthcare is forecast to outperform, and Morgan Stanley prefers industrials relative to other cyclical sectors.
Reducing allocations in emerging-market stocks and commodities: Allocations to emerging-market equities, EXCEPT Mexico and India, could be reduced. China’s lackluster growth will weigh on emerging markets broadly, and there is an added risk that its economy will get caught in a debt-deflation tailspin. By contrast, Mexico is likely to benefit from the post-pandemic near-shoring trend, while India is forecast to see superior growth in earnings per share compared with broader emerging markets
Reducing allocations in commodities: Oil is forecast to trade at relatively flat prices in 2024 and geopolitics remain a concern, while gold appears overvalued. Copper, which could outperform because of stronger-than-expected demand from China, may be an exception.
Investors should keep in mind that the markets have priced in the expectation that economic growth will go smoothly, and that central bankers will succeed in engineering a soft landing.
For those who read the white and black mouse of Tolstoy you can understand the condition.
An Eastern Fable from Leo Tolstoy's A Confession.
I will stay with the miry clay as we walk into what was already written long ago.
thread: amos
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
David noted clearly.
He was right then, and his words are right now. This was not a fight over political philosophy; it was a fight over the dignity of man.
Hayek's work was not fully appreciated until decades after its publication. The thesis that Hitler and Stalin were political oppressors whose rise to power could have been predicted by the European love affair with national socialism that preceded their reign was largely seen as melodramatic, harsh, and illogical. Intellectuals then wanted the same thing they want today: to believe that their precious collectivism can co-exist with peace and harmony - with benign governance and good citizenship. The underlying tenet of socialism was disproven then in the same way it can be disproven today: it discriminates between particular needs of different peoples, it presupposes a superior efficiency from government in central planning that flies in the face of common sense and history, and it massively distorts the risks and rewards that make society function. But to Hayek, the philosophical refutation of socialism was a refutation of all collectivism - not just its more extreme and unpleasant forms. Any economic system that distorted the price mechanism was doomed to fail, and Hayek's classic work on the merit of the price system is even more recognized today than yesteryear for its cogency and brilliance. The government can not accomplish its utopian ends by interfering with a price system, because only a price system can "register all the relevant changes in circumstances and provide a reliable guide for individual's actions." This is not the academic point of a philosophically-minded economist; government distorting of prices and wages has led to utter catastrophe for decades, from its present manipulation of mortgage market rates, to past Nixonian wage and price controls that put the country on the edge of economic disaster. To rob private parties of the ability to "sell and buy at any price that they can find a partner to the transaction" is to rob them of an essential element of a free society. Consumers, producers, employers, and employees are all victims to government intervention in this arena. Hayek predicted it sixty-five years ago, and the period of time since his prediction can be accurately described as "Hayek's vindication".
Hayek was not writing of Barack Obama in 1944. Barney Frank and present House leadership were just infants, if they were born yet at all. In fact, he was not even writing specifically about America, as the greater threat to liberty that he saw in 1944 was in the direction the European countries would take after the war inevitably ended. To Hayek, a series of economic policies were in motion that were intolerable. In 2009, it is this side of the pond now being tested by the challenges Hayek foresaw so long ago. The re-read of his book I just completed leaves one eerily feeling that perhaps Hayek saw into the future. While it may have been England in 1944 that he chastised for "losing her intellectual leadership", and becoming an "importer of ideas", can any of us deny that the same must now be said for America? Hayek believed that what England and Europe did from 1931-1939 created the mess they had from 1940-1944. Likewise, this reviewer confidently posits that, if not corrected, America is presently sowing the seeds for what will be a 2015-2020 that we will not believe if we do not change course. Will we have the "moral courage" for this change, as Hayek pleaded with his contemporaries to do?
Social justice and economic planning do not belong in the same sentence. Not only is the attempt to create the former through the latter completely impossible, it is patently immoral and discriminatory. Artificially attempting to equalize incomes will push income levels further apart, distort the incentive system that a free society depends on, and ignore the validity of prices that help guide the way for us. But Hayek was no Ayn Randian - he saw social justice as a key characteristic in any moral society, but he scoffed at the idea that coercion or centrism could ever create anything resembling "social justice". This was a problem of means and ends: the collectivists wanted to use means to create desired ends that neither worked, nor ought to work.
Hayek profoundly understood the self-refuting error of collectivism and central planning: the "very men most anxious to plan society are the most dangerous if allowed to do so", and they are the "most intolerant of the planning of others". I fondly think of Milton Friedman's famous appearance on Phil Donahue's show many years ago (a popular hit on YouTube), in which Friedman counters Donahue's claim that capitalism is flawed by the evil intentions of capitalists, with the hard facts regarding the evil intentions of central planners (you know, guys like Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot). Collectivism is necessarily totalitarian, and this is a message that the nanny-state of 2009 will not tolerate young people learning. Hayek persuasively argues that in a collectivist society, it is the last people you would want doing central planning who are most eager to do so. "The lowest common denominator unites the largest amount of people."
Hayek was a keen critic of those who lambasted free trade purely out of their own protectionist motives. He was appalled by the willingness of the socialists of his day to sacrifice truth for propaganda (knowingly) if they thought it would advance an ideological agenda. For Hayek, truth was not negotiable.
Hayek understood the folly of using monetary policy to drive a social agenda, and it is frankly stunning to me that we are still operating with the absurd dual mandate of the Federal Reserve today that we had decades ago (by "dual mandate", I refer to the idea that the central bank's role is to maintain a stable currency, AND create full societal employment). Hayek understood as the great lovers of freedom in both the Chicago school and Austrian school have understood ever since: to subject the monetary policy to such a dual mandate would politicize the process, decimate one objective for the sake of the other, and put us on a continued cycle of booms and busts. Today, the rhetoric from Washington D.C. no longer offends our intellect by even pretending that they care about such prehistoric ideas as a stable currency. Free market realities that temporarily hurt one group while helping the overall society are mocked as "laissez faire", and the "politics of do-nothing". Hayek knew why "doing nothing" was so incredibly preferable to "doing the wrong thing".
The challenge of Hayek's day was a challenge of courage. He pleaded with his readers to have the courage to not accept the status quo, and to embrace contemporary problems with a fresh outlook, and with a long-term perspective. He never lost sight of the fact that a policy of individual freedom was the "only truly progressive policy". This exhortation is a powerful one, and one I pray on a daily basis that we will take heed of now. The great things that have made our Republic great are under attack. The enemy in 2009 is the same as the enemy of Hayek's day. Socialism and collectivism are parasites that appeal to man's most evil instinct: the impulse to surrender responsibility, and to simply be led. From the Israelites demanding a King to Americans demanding national health care, ancient history is no different than modern history. With warriors like F.A. Hayek on the side of freedom, I refuse to believe that history belongs to the socialists. But as Hayek taught us sixty-five years ago, the stakes are high. May God keep us off the road to serfdom.
"Independence and self-reliance, individual initiative and local responsibility, the successful reliance on voluntary activity, noninterference with one's neighbor and tolerance of the different, respect for custom and tradition, and a healthy suspicion of power and authority: Almost all the traditions and institutions in which democratic moral genius has found its most characteristic expression, and which in turn have molded the national character and the whole moral climate of England and America, are those which the progress of collectivism and its inherently centralistic tendencies are progressively destroying."
He was right then, and his words are right now. This was not a fight over political philosophy; it was a fight over the dignity of man.
Hayek's work was not fully appreciated until decades after its publication. The thesis that Hitler and Stalin were political oppressors whose rise to power could have been predicted by the European love affair with national socialism that preceded their reign was largely seen as melodramatic, harsh, and illogical. Intellectuals then wanted the same thing they want today: to believe that their precious collectivism can co-exist with peace and harmony - with benign governance and good citizenship. The underlying tenet of socialism was disproven then in the same way it can be disproven today: it discriminates between particular needs of different peoples, it presupposes a superior efficiency from government in central planning that flies in the face of common sense and history, and it massively distorts the risks and rewards that make society function. But to Hayek, the philosophical refutation of socialism was a refutation of all collectivism - not just its more extreme and unpleasant forms. Any economic system that distorted the price mechanism was doomed to fail, and Hayek's classic work on the merit of the price system is even more recognized today than yesteryear for its cogency and brilliance. The government can not accomplish its utopian ends by interfering with a price system, because only a price system can "register all the relevant changes in circumstances and provide a reliable guide for individual's actions." This is not the academic point of a philosophically-minded economist; government distorting of prices and wages has led to utter catastrophe for decades, from its present manipulation of mortgage market rates, to past Nixonian wage and price controls that put the country on the edge of economic disaster. To rob private parties of the ability to "sell and buy at any price that they can find a partner to the transaction" is to rob them of an essential element of a free society. Consumers, producers, employers, and employees are all victims to government intervention in this arena. Hayek predicted it sixty-five years ago, and the period of time since his prediction can be accurately described as "Hayek's vindication".
Hayek was not writing of Barack Obama in 1944. Barney Frank and present House leadership were just infants, if they were born yet at all. In fact, he was not even writing specifically about America, as the greater threat to liberty that he saw in 1944 was in the direction the European countries would take after the war inevitably ended. To Hayek, a series of economic policies were in motion that were intolerable. In 2009, it is this side of the pond now being tested by the challenges Hayek foresaw so long ago. The re-read of his book I just completed leaves one eerily feeling that perhaps Hayek saw into the future. While it may have been England in 1944 that he chastised for "losing her intellectual leadership", and becoming an "importer of ideas", can any of us deny that the same must now be said for America? Hayek believed that what England and Europe did from 1931-1939 created the mess they had from 1940-1944. Likewise, this reviewer confidently posits that, if not corrected, America is presently sowing the seeds for what will be a 2015-2020 that we will not believe if we do not change course. Will we have the "moral courage" for this change, as Hayek pleaded with his contemporaries to do?
Social justice and economic planning do not belong in the same sentence. Not only is the attempt to create the former through the latter completely impossible, it is patently immoral and discriminatory. Artificially attempting to equalize incomes will push income levels further apart, distort the incentive system that a free society depends on, and ignore the validity of prices that help guide the way for us. But Hayek was no Ayn Randian - he saw social justice as a key characteristic in any moral society, but he scoffed at the idea that coercion or centrism could ever create anything resembling "social justice". This was a problem of means and ends: the collectivists wanted to use means to create desired ends that neither worked, nor ought to work.
Hayek profoundly understood the self-refuting error of collectivism and central planning: the "very men most anxious to plan society are the most dangerous if allowed to do so", and they are the "most intolerant of the planning of others". I fondly think of Milton Friedman's famous appearance on Phil Donahue's show many years ago (a popular hit on YouTube), in which Friedman counters Donahue's claim that capitalism is flawed by the evil intentions of capitalists, with the hard facts regarding the evil intentions of central planners (you know, guys like Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot). Collectivism is necessarily totalitarian, and this is a message that the nanny-state of 2009 will not tolerate young people learning. Hayek persuasively argues that in a collectivist society, it is the last people you would want doing central planning who are most eager to do so. "The lowest common denominator unites the largest amount of people."
Hayek was a keen critic of those who lambasted free trade purely out of their own protectionist motives. He was appalled by the willingness of the socialists of his day to sacrifice truth for propaganda (knowingly) if they thought it would advance an ideological agenda. For Hayek, truth was not negotiable.
Hayek understood the folly of using monetary policy to drive a social agenda, and it is frankly stunning to me that we are still operating with the absurd dual mandate of the Federal Reserve today that we had decades ago (by "dual mandate", I refer to the idea that the central bank's role is to maintain a stable currency, AND create full societal employment). Hayek understood as the great lovers of freedom in both the Chicago school and Austrian school have understood ever since: to subject the monetary policy to such a dual mandate would politicize the process, decimate one objective for the sake of the other, and put us on a continued cycle of booms and busts. Today, the rhetoric from Washington D.C. no longer offends our intellect by even pretending that they care about such prehistoric ideas as a stable currency. Free market realities that temporarily hurt one group while helping the overall society are mocked as "laissez faire", and the "politics of do-nothing". Hayek knew why "doing nothing" was so incredibly preferable to "doing the wrong thing".
The challenge of Hayek's day was a challenge of courage. He pleaded with his readers to have the courage to not accept the status quo, and to embrace contemporary problems with a fresh outlook, and with a long-term perspective. He never lost sight of the fact that a policy of individual freedom was the "only truly progressive policy". This exhortation is a powerful one, and one I pray on a daily basis that we will take heed of now. The great things that have made our Republic great are under attack. The enemy in 2009 is the same as the enemy of Hayek's day. Socialism and collectivism are parasites that appeal to man's most evil instinct: the impulse to surrender responsibility, and to simply be led. From the Israelites demanding a King to Americans demanding national health care, ancient history is no different than modern history. With warriors like F.A. Hayek on the side of freedom, I refuse to believe that history belongs to the socialists. But as Hayek taught us sixty-five years ago, the stakes are high. May God keep us off the road to serfdom.
"Independence and self-reliance, individual initiative and local responsibility, the successful reliance on voluntary activity, noninterference with one's neighbor and tolerance of the different, respect for custom and tradition, and a healthy suspicion of power and authority: Almost all the traditions and institutions in which democratic moral genius has found its most characteristic expression, and which in turn have molded the national character and the whole moral climate of England and America, are those which the progress of collectivism and its inherently centralistic tendencies are progressively destroying."
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
Griftens should be in a cage above a spire for 300 years with the carnage produced from ignoring Jefferson alone.
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
The point is not to win. White mice and black mice fund all sides.
Control the debt. Swamp water magic since August 5, 1861 for the first federal income tax.
General Grant was clear enough in the root issue after that.
Extensive cotton trade continued between the North and South. Northern textile mills in New York and New England were dependent on Southern cotton, while Southern plantation owners depended on the trade with the North for their economic survival. The U.S. Government permitted limited trade, licensed by the Treasury and the U.S. Army. Corruption flourished as unlicensed traders bribed Army officers to allow them to buy Southern cotton without a permit. The point was simple and still ignored as why they bitched to the Senate dropping to the same crayon chewer effect when that district under his command was engaged in prosecution of the War.
Why would White men like Biden and Milley piss on their own and are?
Short answer: They wouldn't.
Long answer: They don't run the show.
Coalition of Useful Idiots starting to assemble body farm hell spawned debt zombies.
Control the debt. Swamp water magic since August 5, 1861 for the first federal income tax.
General Grant was clear enough in the root issue after that.
Extensive cotton trade continued between the North and South. Northern textile mills in New York and New England were dependent on Southern cotton, while Southern plantation owners depended on the trade with the North for their economic survival. The U.S. Government permitted limited trade, licensed by the Treasury and the U.S. Army. Corruption flourished as unlicensed traders bribed Army officers to allow them to buy Southern cotton without a permit. The point was simple and still ignored as why they bitched to the Senate dropping to the same crayon chewer effect when that district under his command was engaged in prosecution of the War.
Why would White men like Biden and Milley piss on their own and are?
Short answer: They wouldn't.
Long answer: They don't run the show.
Coalition of Useful Idiots starting to assemble body farm hell spawned debt zombies.
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
The Suez Crisis – which ended with thousands of casualties on both sides – was seen as a decisive blow for the British government, and Conservative Prime Minister Anthony Eden resigned in January 1957.
Giften will end up like the usual suspects as before. Senate acts like it looks right now. CRT and DEI fools as Truman clearly conveyed.
This is the retrospective conclusion of Guy Millard, who wrote in 1957 a most detailed private history of this period.
He felt that it was a mistake for Britain to try to solve the two problems simultaneously, and this was a criticism of British policy made by the Americans during the crisis.
Written by Guy Millard in August 1957 and published by the Cabinet Office for UK Eyes Only on 21 October 1957. National Archives CAB 21/3314. This document does not spell out the detail of the collusion between France, Israel and the UK, but is not exactly the same as that written by Millard; the original version has disappeared.
Not stretch of thought who levaged two fronts.
In democracies, Eden should have known there can be no question of perpetual secrecy.
The French and the Israeli leaders afterwards resented the British Cabinet's decision to halt the advancing troops down the Canal
and they had no guilty consciences about the military operation even after its failure.
The Senate will not be forgiven if they do not step in period. Taxpayers know this. Tyrants will not. We know this also.
https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article/ ... ogin=false
Giften will end up like the usual suspects as before. Senate acts like it looks right now. CRT and DEI fools as Truman clearly conveyed.
This is the retrospective conclusion of Guy Millard, who wrote in 1957 a most detailed private history of this period.
He felt that it was a mistake for Britain to try to solve the two problems simultaneously, and this was a criticism of British policy made by the Americans during the crisis.
Written by Guy Millard in August 1957 and published by the Cabinet Office for UK Eyes Only on 21 October 1957. National Archives CAB 21/3314. This document does not spell out the detail of the collusion between France, Israel and the UK, but is not exactly the same as that written by Millard; the original version has disappeared.
Not stretch of thought who levaged two fronts.
In democracies, Eden should have known there can be no question of perpetual secrecy.
The French and the Israeli leaders afterwards resented the British Cabinet's decision to halt the advancing troops down the Canal
and they had no guilty consciences about the military operation even after its failure.
The Senate will not be forgiven if they do not step in period. Taxpayers know this. Tyrants will not. We know this also.
https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article/ ... ogin=false
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
V V noted Jeb the UN plant in high heels tattooed on Rick for the dead red horse cult.
Grifter Joe held in cyro tank for the demshevik ngo meat puppet open border implosion cult.
Bobs kid states the obvious and given a hear.
Euripides get the salient point on the Dorian dancers as they ferried over the river.
https://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18739#p18739
They are not stupid just the bent of mind it derived from.
https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j04 ... _67-92.pdf
thread: peleg
Peleg
In his day was the earth divided. The meaning of his name, that is, ‘division’, as rendered in Hebrew, is confirmed by
the Akkadian noun pulukku, which means a dividing up of territory by means of borders and boundaries. The
Akkadian verb meaning to divide at the borders, is palaku. Likewise, the Assyrian palgu refers to the dividing up of
land by canals and irrigation systems. It is in this sense that the Hebrew word peleg is used in, for example,
Job 29:6 and Job 38:5.
Grifter Joe held in cyro tank for the demshevik ngo meat puppet open border implosion cult.
Bobs kid states the obvious and given a hear.
Euripides get the salient point on the Dorian dancers as they ferried over the river.
https://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18739#p18739
They are not stupid just the bent of mind it derived from.
https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j04 ... _67-92.pdf
thread: peleg
Peleg
In his day was the earth divided. The meaning of his name, that is, ‘division’, as rendered in Hebrew, is confirmed by
the Akkadian noun pulukku, which means a dividing up of territory by means of borders and boundaries. The
Akkadian verb meaning to divide at the borders, is palaku. Likewise, the Assyrian palgu refers to the dividing up of
land by canals and irrigation systems. It is in this sense that the Hebrew word peleg is used in, for example,
Job 29:6 and Job 38:5.
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
She is too utterly lost to realize demographics and those people don't like the grifter core other that the crayon chewer people do.
First, they will take over her district and then her seat. She is literally too stupid to understand.
Hisps aren't going to vote for baby killers.
Stop thinking you can deal with Uniparty Demsheviks.
Cloward-Piven Strategy:
1. Overload and Break the Welfare System
2. Have Chaos Ensue
3. Take Control in the Chaos
4. Implement Socialism and Communism through Treason and Force.
This plan, drawn up in 1923 by Count Richard Kalergi, is inspired by human mastery over farm animals.
It seeks to generate a passive, tame, predictable and manipulable mixed race, of inferior character and intelligence.
You will not be allowed a Juice Box Straw as you are turned in a dead Husk Country to be disposed of as they even told the fools.
They elected Her as they proved just as stupid as She simply proved to be. Gaza War Expanded as Uniparty collapsed what was already gone.
$20,000 drones drew a response from $1 million anti-air interceptor missiles as education ceased for the replacement voters and
a Veteran evicted in real time in the demshevik zone. Property taxes in the demsheviks enclaves will ensue as massive eviction rendered
them Homeless and will in the tens of countless thousands as the report design forwarded.
Biden administration removed the Houthis from the terror list which allowed them to get U.N. and Iranian money through world bank.
The report examined $1.699 billion in weapons sent to Ukraine that are subject to enhanced end-use monitoring (EEUM), which includes Javelin anti-tank missiles, Stinger anti-aircraft missiles, night vision goggles, AIM-9X air-to-air missiles, Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles, and other types of weaponry.
The IG report found that the majority of the EEUM arms, nearly 40,000 weapons in total worth approximately $1.005 billion, have not been accounted for.
US forced the tanker, formerly named Suez Rajan, to sail to Texas when it was carrying 800,000 barrels of Iranian oil using the pretext of sanctions enforcement.
The ship sat off the coast of Texas for months as Iran was warning of retaliation if it was discharged, and American companies did not want to be involved. But the oil, worth approximately $56 million, was eventually transferred to another tanker in August 2023.
Iran’s Fars news agency reported on Thursday: “Following the violation of the Suez Rajan in April and the theft of Iranian oil by the United States, the oil tanker renamed St. Nicholas was seized in retaliation this morning by the court order and the approval of the Ports and Shipping Organization by the strategic Navy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army and transferred to Iranian ports.”
The report said the tanker was taken because it had stolen cargo belonging to Iran at the direction of the US.
The St. Nicholas was seized after it was loaded with oil in Basra, Iraq, and was bound for Aliaga, Turkey, via the Suez Canal.
Following weeks of Houthi-led attacks on vessels in the Red Sea, the United States and United Kingdom have launched military strikes in Yemen in response, which the Houthis have described as “barbaric”.
The Houthis are an Iran-aligned group based in Yemen and have said their attacks are a response to Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, and the international community’s failure to put an end to it. SOURCE: AL JAZEERA
For those who read the white or black mouse of Tolstoy you can understand condition.
An Eastern Fable from Leo Tolstoy's A Confession.
I will stay with the miry clay as we walk into what was already written long ago.
The recent study indicated Egypt will factor into the view we considered in Amos to be fulfilled from further consideration from others who do have a clue even before the Zadok and Essenes and the other thought camps also.
The only rampant map seen is rule 5 as sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
Rule 12 will be incoming as Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
The root study study from amos 6:1-5 as viol in the KJV if/then in 4q177 for those who can understand to psm 12-1 8th string as the 8th Onah period as 500 year window as nathan is understood.
The Isa 41:21-24 will be involved for consul.
But you are less than nothing and your works are utterly worthless; whoever chooses you is detestable.
This covers the word of hamas alone and what was gathered of the miry clay.
thread: amos, חמס
First, they will take over her district and then her seat. She is literally too stupid to understand.
Hisps aren't going to vote for baby killers.
Stop thinking you can deal with Uniparty Demsheviks.
Cloward-Piven Strategy:
1. Overload and Break the Welfare System
2. Have Chaos Ensue
3. Take Control in the Chaos
4. Implement Socialism and Communism through Treason and Force.
This plan, drawn up in 1923 by Count Richard Kalergi, is inspired by human mastery over farm animals.
It seeks to generate a passive, tame, predictable and manipulable mixed race, of inferior character and intelligence.
You will not be allowed a Juice Box Straw as you are turned in a dead Husk Country to be disposed of as they even told the fools.
They elected Her as they proved just as stupid as She simply proved to be. Gaza War Expanded as Uniparty collapsed what was already gone.
$20,000 drones drew a response from $1 million anti-air interceptor missiles as education ceased for the replacement voters and
a Veteran evicted in real time in the demshevik zone. Property taxes in the demsheviks enclaves will ensue as massive eviction rendered
them Homeless and will in the tens of countless thousands as the report design forwarded.
Biden administration removed the Houthis from the terror list which allowed them to get U.N. and Iranian money through world bank.
The report examined $1.699 billion in weapons sent to Ukraine that are subject to enhanced end-use monitoring (EEUM), which includes Javelin anti-tank missiles, Stinger anti-aircraft missiles, night vision goggles, AIM-9X air-to-air missiles, Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles, and other types of weaponry.
The IG report found that the majority of the EEUM arms, nearly 40,000 weapons in total worth approximately $1.005 billion, have not been accounted for.
US forced the tanker, formerly named Suez Rajan, to sail to Texas when it was carrying 800,000 barrels of Iranian oil using the pretext of sanctions enforcement.
The ship sat off the coast of Texas for months as Iran was warning of retaliation if it was discharged, and American companies did not want to be involved. But the oil, worth approximately $56 million, was eventually transferred to another tanker in August 2023.
Iran’s Fars news agency reported on Thursday: “Following the violation of the Suez Rajan in April and the theft of Iranian oil by the United States, the oil tanker renamed St. Nicholas was seized in retaliation this morning by the court order and the approval of the Ports and Shipping Organization by the strategic Navy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army and transferred to Iranian ports.”
The report said the tanker was taken because it had stolen cargo belonging to Iran at the direction of the US.
The St. Nicholas was seized after it was loaded with oil in Basra, Iraq, and was bound for Aliaga, Turkey, via the Suez Canal.
Following weeks of Houthi-led attacks on vessels in the Red Sea, the United States and United Kingdom have launched military strikes in Yemen in response, which the Houthis have described as “barbaric”.
The Houthis are an Iran-aligned group based in Yemen and have said their attacks are a response to Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, and the international community’s failure to put an end to it. SOURCE: AL JAZEERA
For those who read the white or black mouse of Tolstoy you can understand condition.
An Eastern Fable from Leo Tolstoy's A Confession.
I will stay with the miry clay as we walk into what was already written long ago.
The recent study indicated Egypt will factor into the view we considered in Amos to be fulfilled from further consideration from others who do have a clue even before the Zadok and Essenes and the other thought camps also.
The only rampant map seen is rule 5 as sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
Rule 12 will be incoming as Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
The root study study from amos 6:1-5 as viol in the KJV if/then in 4q177 for those who can understand to psm 12-1 8th string as the 8th Onah period as 500 year window as nathan is understood.
The Isa 41:21-24 will be involved for consul.
But you are less than nothing and your works are utterly worthless; whoever chooses you is detestable.
This covers the word of hamas alone and what was gathered of the miry clay.
thread: amos, חמס
Last edited by aeden on Fri Jan 12, 2024 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests