Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

[aeden]

https://www.gorozen.com/commentaries

[aeden]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vulaqlBDmqQ
first four minutes as the poison pill just swallowed

[vincecate]

Been waiting a long time for a crash but it really seems like it should be soon now.
On x.com I am vincecate and I have posted many things of the form X is most extreme since dot com bubble
or Y most extreme since 1929.

My AI song about getting life into space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arKDKjFas_E

[Cool Breeze]

Been waiting a long time for a crash but it really seems like it should be soon now.
On x.com I am vincecate and I have posted many things of the form X is most extreme since dot com bubble
or Y most extreme since 1929.

My AI song about getting life into space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arKDKjFas_E

Keep waiting, V

[Higgenbotham]

658 The Neumann Compendium

For the kind of explosiveness that man
will be able to contrive by 1980, the globe
is dangerously small, its political units
dangerously unstable.

CAN WE SURVIVE TECHNOLOGY?

by John von Neumann
Member, Atomic Energy Commission

Controlled climate

Let us now consider a thoroughly "abnormal" industry and its potentialities—that is, an industry as yet without a place in any list of major activities: the control of weather or, to use a more ambitious but justified term, climate. One phase of this activity that has received a good deal of public attention is "rain making." The present technique assumes extensive rain clouds, and forces precipitation by applying small amounts of chemical agents. While it is not easy to evaluate the significance of the efforts made thus far, the evidence seems to indicate that the aim is an attainable one.

But weather control and climate control are really much broader than rain making. All major weather phenomena, as well as climate as such, are ultimately controlled by the solar energy that falls on the earth. To modify the amount of solar energy, is, of course, beyond human power. But what really matters is not the amount that hits the earth, but the fraction retained by the earth, since that reflected back into space is no more useful than if it had never arrived. Now, the amount absorbed by the solid earth, the sea, or the atmosphere seems to be subject to delicate influences. True, none of these has so far been substantially controlled by human will, but there are strong indications of control possibilities.

The carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere by industry's burning of coal and oil-—more than half of it during the last generation—may have changed the atmosphere's composition sufficiently to account for a general warming of the world by about one degree Fahrenheit. The volcano Krakatao erupted in 1883 and released an amount of energy by no means exorbitant. Had the dust of the eruption stayed in the stratosphere for fifteen years, reflecting sunlight away from the earth, it might have sufficed to lower the world's temperature by six degrees (in fact, it stayed for about three years, and five such eruptions would probably have achieved the result mentioned). This would have been a substantial cooling; the last Ice Age, when half of North America and all of northern and western Europe were under an ice cap like that of Greenland or Antarctica, was only fifteen degrees colder than the present age. On the other hand, another fifteen degrees of warming would probably melt the ice of Greenland and Antarctica and produce world-wide tropical to semi-tropical climate.

"Rather fantastic effects"

Furthermore, it is known that the persistence of large ice fields is due to the fact that ice both reflects sunlight energy and radiates away terrestrial energy at an even higher rate than ordinary soil. Microscopic layers of colored matter spread on an icy surface, or in the atmosphere above one, could inhibit the reflection-radiation process, melt the ice, and change the local climate. Measures that would effect such changes are technically possible, and the amount of investment required would be only of the order of magnitude that sufficed to develop rail systems and other major industries. The main difficulty lies in predicting in detail the effects of any such drastic intervention. But our knowledge of the dynamics and the controlling processes in the atmosphere is rapidly approaching a level that would permit such prediction. Probably intervention in atmospheric and climatic matters will come in a few decades, and will unfold on a scale difficult to imagine at present.

What could be done, of course, is no index to what should be done; to make a new ice age in order to annoy others, or a new tropical, "interglacial" age in order to please everybody, is not necessarily a rational program. In fact, to evaluate the ultimate consequences of either a general cooling or a general heating would be a complex matter. Changes would affect the level of the seas, and hence the habitability of the continental coastal shelves; the evaporation of the seas, and hence general precipitation and glaciation levels; and so on. What would be harmful and what beneficial—and to which regions of the earth — is not immediately obvious. But there is little doubt that one could carry out analyses needed to predict results, intervene on any desired scale, and ultimately achieve rather fantastic effects. The climate of specific regions and levels of precipitation might be altered. For example, temporary disturbances—including invasions of cold (polar) air that constitute the typical winter of the middle latitudes, and tropical storms (hurricanes) —might be corrected or at least depressed.

There is no need to detail what such things would mean to agriculture or, indeed, to all phases of human, animal, and plant ecology. What power over our environment, over all nature, is implied!

Such actions would be more directly and truly worldwide than recent or, presumably, future wars, or than the economy at any time. Extensive human intervention would deeply affect the atmosphere's general circulation, which depends on the earth's rotation and intensive solar heating of the tropics. Measures in the arctic may control the weather in temperate regions, or measures in one temperate region critically affect another, one quarter around the globe. All this will merge each nation's affairs with those of every other, more thoroughly than the threat of a nuclear or any other war may already have done.

https://sseh.uchicago.edu/doc/von_Neumann_1955.pdf

The above was written by John Von Neumann in 1955.

This reminds me a bit of the Wingspread Statement, which was mentioned a few dozen pages back, in that there's very little online discussion along the lines of this statement by Von Neumann either. I'm not sure why that is in either case.

[Higgenbotham]

Mentioning Von Neumann reminded me that Roosevelt had his "Dollar a Year Men" and the immigrant Jewish Manhattan Project scientists, while Trump is in the process of assembling the likes of Elon Musk and the H1-B Indian "Tech Bros" around him. It's already been discussed that, while Trump fits the correct mold to be the Gray Champion (Obama did not), it's an open question as to whether he has the temperament and resources to successfully pull it off. Some quotes from Strauss and Howe were reproduced to support that notion.

Khanna, a House Democrat who represents Silicon Valley and a potential future presidential candidate, has known Musk for more than 10 years. In an interview, he called Musk an “an extraordinary entrepreneur” and said that he fits the mold of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “dollar-a-year men,” the corporate executives who were paid a symbolic salary of $1 annually to help the federal government mobilize for WWII.

Khanna said he has “exchanged texts” with Musk since Trump tapped him to head DOGE. He declined to “go into private exchanges” but said they have discussed “the places where we can collaborate.”

“We have a candid conversation. He also knows where I disagree with him,” he said. “We need to engage these technologists and builders to be part of our coalition, but without compromising our values.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/12/1 ... hip-000579

There are a lot of reasons to think that this is not an apt comparison. But first it would behoove me to further investigate who Roosevelt's dollar a year men were and what they accomplished. Also, Trump's recent appointments and support of the Indian "Tech Bros" and H1-B has caused a backlash from MAGA voters who feel they have been betrayed. I don't see that anybody has attempted to compare the Indian "Tech Bros" to the eminent Jewish Manhattan Project scientists, but there's still plenty of time for that. There are a lot of reasons to think that, in the event that comparison is attempted, it is not apt either.

[Higgenbotham]

The solution to the H1-B visa debate would be yearly tariffs. We know Trumpy loves tariffs anyway, so why not. Tech employers often cite the reason for supporting H1-B is that they need these "highly skilled" immigrants who are so so so much more "highly skilled" than the Americans they can hire. OK, let's prove that out by assuming it is true. If true, the high tech employers should be able to share some of this copious bounty with the US government to help lower the deficit and the debt. If the tech industry claims that the average H1-B visa holder contributes, let's say, $100,000 more value added to the company than the average American they can hire, they can split the bounty with the American taxpayer and fork over $50,000 per head per year. If it's some small amount like $30,000 per year, then there is no need for the H1-B workers anyway; the tech companies make enough profits that it won't hurt them and half of that wouldn't be worth collecting. If H1-B is tariffed at the $50,000 per head per year rate, my bet is H1-B would go from being a torrent to a trickle. The tariff won't happen for that reason; there is little value added and it's primarily a method to lower wages.

[spottybrowncow]

I nominate you to DOGE.

[tim]

I don't know much about H1B but I think of Operation Paperclip when it comes to importing foreign skilled workers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rwZsCwPJYs

https://www.history.com/news/what-was-o ... -paperclip

In a covert affair originally dubbed Operation Overcast but later renamed Operation Paperclip, roughly 1,600 of these German scientists (along with their families) were brought to the United States to work on America’s behalf during the Cold War. The program was run by the newly-formed Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA), whose goal was to harness German intellectual resources to help develop America’s arsenal of rockets and other biological and chemical weapons, and to ensure such coveted information did not fall into the hands of the Soviet Union.

Although he officially sanctioned the operation, President Harry Truman forbade the agency from recruiting any Nazi members or active Nazi supporters. Nevertheless, officials within the JIOA and Office of Strategic Services (OSS)—the forerunner to the CIA—bypassed this directive by eliminating or whitewashing incriminating evidence of possible war crimes from the scientists’ records, believing their intelligence to be crucial to the country’s postwar efforts.

There is debate as to whether America could have ever reached the moon without Wernher Von Braun.

https://time.com/5627637/nasa-nazi-von-braun/

But much of the Cold War-era coverage of von Braun downplayed the darker details of his past: before he was building rockets for America, he was building them for Hitler. Germany launched more than 3,000 missiles of his design against Britain and other countries, indiscriminately killing approximately 5,000 people, while as many as 20,000 concentration camp prisoners died assembling the weapons.

[aeden]

Anything that needs to be done is already in a scripted database you may call oracle or SAP. Next.
Importing is irrelevant as the ignored fact the supply chain is in compression in sticky wage labor pools
who interrupted the prototypes now delayed in a zone from the asymmetrical warfare Marxy inspired locust
who just took it out again.
They said they are Koreans or Japanese to avoid being terminated with machetes was the blow back at ground contact level.
The Pareto effect was forwarded since two conditions only exist in Business.
We here know what that is.
Remember borders do not exist as the locals walk in circles and simply blood bags in the
Vampire Economy written already. Doge is part of the entertainment committee to fungible capex.
Last time 15 percent over supply sent it to levels H and few here noted within percentages.
We just mentioned a few facts like Carson with an envelope to his forehead as they sit on the stool.
No clue as the charts go fear and praise as before.
Sapolsky effect would suffice given the landscape for now.

From this https://www.sciencealert.com/images/art ... e_1024.jpg
It is likely the costs of doing so will ultimately exceed $2 billion a year, and the process is expected to take 30 to 40 years.
Meanwhile complete offline supply that took Fritz out is on display as these halfwits carbon climate cults bark.

Double down to certify off lined to be back in production.
https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites ... 605031.pdf
Further refinement of the Arrhenius models should help accurately predict system properties.

The RVID data as fracture toughness projections in the end of the original 40-year operating license is the fact
as these other insane Kalergi zones go dark.