Religion and Vaccine Arguments

As requested, this sub-forum is for partying, fun, gossip, conundrums, flirting, comedy, tragedy, or whatever.
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.co ... iochemical
DECLASSIFIED CIA REPORT: BIOCHEMICAL RESEMBLANCE BETWEEN ENDOPARASITES AND MALIGNANT TUMORS
In 2011 the CIA nonchalantly declassified their “sanitized copy approved for release” report on 1940s Soviet research establishing that cancers and parasites, “resemble each other in many respects by reason of similar conditions under which they grow and exist. This suggested long ago the idea in regard to the parasitic nature of tumors.”

For many years now this Substack has been exposing that cancer is akin to parasitic disease, concurrent with some form of metabolic dysfunction, not limited to VAIDS-induced cancers, and that the most effective way to cure all cancers involves a multi-pronged approach of repurposed antiparasitic compounds and diet; for example:
What is particularly fascinating is that Soviet researchers were positing over three quarters of a century ago that antiparasitic compounds like atebrin would cure cancer.

They were also already aware of the metabolic shift in tumor cells to meet increased requirements for DNA and RNA synthesis, energy production (via ATP and GTP), and signaling (via cAMP and cGMP); in other words, they were describing a kind of cancer mutation that allowed these deadly cells to adapt the “Warburg effect;” thus, allowing the cancer cells to feed on glucose, versus healthy cells which require oxygen.

Basically, the Soviets (and Americans) were well aware of these properties of cancer, and more than likely could have cured all cancers long ago if they so wanted to.

Of course, BigPharma and their Intelligence-Industrial Complex handlers had other plans, and by the 1960s they were only interested in foisting cancer-causing vaccines, carcinogenic chemicals, GMO, and other poisons on humanity, rather than actually curing cancer.

Even way back in 1896 Dr. Charles F. Craig wrote a brief scientific paper titled, THE PARASITIC ORIGIN OF CARCINOMA, where he postulated:

It is the purpose of this paper to briefly review the most important investigations upon the parasitic origin of this disease…

…these [parasitic] bodies are present in fresh cancer cells, so that they cannot be produced by changes occurring in the cells during the process of hardening. Plimmer found them present in every case of cancer which he examined (four hundred consecutive cases) and never found them in any other variety of tumor.

It is especially ironic that Dr. Craig’s historic research is currently being hosted on the NIH website.

Even BigPharma-owned sites like Cancer Research Institute (CRI) were publishing in 2014 articles titled, Do Bacteria Cause Cancer?, admitting that cancer is caused by parasites and bacteria that in turn induce chronic inflammation:

William Coley, MD, the 19th century New York surgeon known as the “Father of Cancer Immunology,” had an interesting theory about what causes cancer: he thought cancer was caused by a microbe. Some tiny organism originating outside the body had invaded and caused the cancer—much like bacteria invading the lungs cause tuberculosis (TB). This “parasitic theory of cancer” became popular at the end of the 19th century, when many common diseases such as tuberculosis, cholera, anthrax, and smallpox were shown to be caused by identifiable “germs.” Cancer too, many believed, was likely microbial in origin.

“The evidence in favor of the microparasitic origin of cancer has been steadily and rapidly accumulating until at the present moment it rests little short of absolute demonstration,” Coley wrote confidently in 1893.

The parasitic origin of cancer had many things going for it. For one, it helped to make sense of Coley’s clinical experience with bacterial toxins (“Coley’s toxins”) as a treatment for cancer. If bacterial toxins were able to kill cancer, that must be because cancer itself was caused by a microbe.

[…[

So strong was the opposition to the parasitic theory that even when The Rockefeller Institute biologist Peyton Rous, in 1911, provided clear evidence that a microscopic parasite—a virus—was able to cause cancer in farm animals, no one believed him. It was not until 1966 that Rous’s discovery of chicken sarcoma virus was vindicated, by a Nobel Prize, when Rous was 86 years old.

[…]

Today, scientists realize that Virchow was largely correct. Chronic inflammation, triggered by bacteria, can lead to the production of DNA-damaging molecules that cause mutations; this, combined with signals to produce new cells and grow new blood vessels—hallmarks of wound healing—can create a fertile ground for the emergence and growth of cancer.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/haw ... vaccinated
Hawaii Measles Case in Vaccinated Person

State Department of Health confirms.
The MMR vaccine contains a live measles virus, according to the manufacturer.

The live measles virus in the MMR vaccine is the product of gain-of-function (GOF) laboratory experiments, meaning it is deliberately engineered to enhance its ability to infect more human cells than the wild-type measles virus is able to, and may retain characteristics that enable transmission and replication in the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.

The live virus in the vaccine can be shed for weeks from the vaccinated, potentially infecting the unvaccinated. A 1995 CDC study found that 83% of vaccinated children had measles virus shed in their urine. An April 2012 publication in the peer-reviewed journal Paediatrics & Child Health reported a child was being investigated after developing a new-onset measles-type rash after receiving a measles vaccine, meaning the shot can cause disease in the vaccinated. Nucleic acid testing confirmed that a “vaccine-type measles virus was being shed in the [child’s] urine.” A 2014 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases confirms that vaccinated individuals can transmit measles to multiple contacts.

There are no peer-reviewed studies that confirm the virus in the measles vaccine is less infectious or replicates less in humans than the wild-type virus found in nature, meaning health officials have no scientific basis for claiming the vaccine strain poses a lower transmission risk to the unvaccinated.

The claim that many of these measles cases are from wild-type measles viruses and not the live virus in the vaccine is undermined by the fact that the PCR test used as evidence of wild-type infection is only reliable less than 3% of the time. Research in Access Microbiology highlights that standard PCR assays might not effectively distinguish between vaccine and wild-type strains. The CDC has confirmed that PCR tests often misinterpret measles vaccine virus infection as wild-type measles infection: “Inability of these testing panels to differentiate between measles virus causing illness and incidental detection of measles vaccine virus RNA can have significant public health reporting and response ramifications, potentially leading to misdiagnosis of measles virus infection,” writes CDC. BLAST analysis shows that the CDC’s measles RT-PCR forward primer, reverse primer, and fluorescent probe all have numerous perfect or near-perfect contiguous matches to the human genome (15–20 bases, up to 100% identity), meaning the assay can generate a positive PCR signal based on human genetic material rather than the measles virus itself.

95% of infants develop fever after measles vaccination, 16% develop more serious measles-like symptoms; and in 70% of vaccinated children with measles-like illness, health officials can not tell if the vaccine pathogen or a wild measles virus caused the illness, according (here) to the journal BMC Infectious Diseases.

CDC data show that 95% of U.S. measles cases are “unvaccinated or unknown,” but because the agency merges confirmed unvaccinated individuals with cases where vaccination status is simply unknown, the dataset obscures how many infections actually occurred in vaccinated versus unvaccinated people.

Measles outbreaks have followed government-led vaccination campaigns in Texas, Canada, and Hawaii, raising concerns of vaccine-caused infections.

Texas administered 15,000 more measles vaccinations in 2025 compared to 2024. The state subsequently suffered a growing measles outbreak that surpassed the total number of cases reported across the entire United States the previous year.

A 12-month-old girl in Michigan who was infected with measles had received an MMR vaccine.

Southern New Mexico’s most populous and vaccinated county, Doña Ana, reported its first measles infection after the state nearly doubled its measles vaccination rate compared to 2024.

Virginia’s first confirmed measles case in 2025 occurred in a child following state and local health officials issuing multiple public health announcements urging residents to get the MMR shot.

Just weeks after the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) rolled out a “measles simulator dashboard” meant to pressure students and residents into receiving MMR vaccines, Illinois reported its first confirmed measles case of 2025.

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment recently confirmed a fifth case of measles in Colorado in 2025 in a Denver County adult resident with verified measles (MMR) vaccination records.

In May 2025, Texas and New Mexico had the sharpest increase in measles vaccination—they also had the most measles cases.

The Iowa Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reported a confirmed case of measles in central Iowa in an adult following a state-led MMR vaccination campaign, raising questions as to whether the efforts to boost vaccination rates led to the infection.

Dallas’ first measles case was found in a “fully vaccinated” woman.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/excess-dea ... lia-cannot
Excess deaths in Australia cannot be explained by any other mechanism other than the COVID shots

Lataster paper, published in peer-reviewed literature, shows a pattern of excess deaths that authorities don't even attempt to explain other than by hand-waving assertions that do not fit the data
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/who ... to-dictate
WHO Convenes Global Session to Dictate How the Coming Influenza Pandemic Will Be Run

Foreign pandemic governance cartel is "[p]reparing for and responding to an influenza pandemic."
The World Health Organization will convene an online international pandemic control session on Wednesday, March 18, centered on the unelected globalist group’s Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (PIP) Framework, according to a WHO press release.

PIP is the international structure through which the WHO, a foreign syndicate, dictates how influenza virus samples are transferred worldwide, and how pandemic vaccines, antivirals, and diagnostics are allocated once an influenza pandemic response is activated.

The new pandemic control session, organized through the WHO’s Epidemics and Pandemics Information Network (EPI-WIN), will decree how governments, laboratories participating in the WHO influenza surveillance network, and pharmaceutical manufacturers operate under the framework during an influenza pandemic response.

The United States is still participating in WHO pandemic surveillance networks (here)—including the organization’s CoViNet sentinel surveillance system, which now spans 45 reference laboratories worldwide—through institutions such as Emory University, Ohio State University, and the CDC, despite President Donald Trump’s executive order publicly withdrawing the country from the organization earlier this year.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://tdefender.substack.com/p/cdc-bu ... -documents
CDC Buried COVID Vaccine Death Data in Lancet Study, Internal Documents Reveal

CDC researchers altered their own study on COVID-19 vaccine adverse events to downplay deaths linked to the shots, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/ ... t-humanity
THE ULTIMATE CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY: Study Involving Over 1 Million Children Finds Myocarditis Only Occurred in Covid-Vaccinated Children

There were ZERO myocarditis cases in unvaccinated kids. Let that sink in.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://fenbendazole.substack.com/p/th ... paper-that
They Retracted the 2025 Paper That Proved Fenbendazole Cures Cancer

Here’s Why That Tells You Everything.
Big Cancer tipped its hand — and showed its true colors.

A medical journal just retracted one of the most significant papers ever published on fenbendazole as a cancer treatment. Three patients. Three different solid tumor metastatic cancers. All three in complete or near-complete remission. No adverse effects. Sustained over years.

That paper is now gone from the literature (it is available for download as a PDF but its content are not indexed or searchable on PubMed). And the reason given for pulling it is one of the most cynical acts of institutional overreach on record.

I want to tell you exactly what happened — and why it matters far more than the retraction itself. I took this retraction personally, not because I was an author, but because I supplied all the case report data that comprised the paper. One case is my mother-in-law, one has become a good friend and another is a stellar individual always ready to help others. They submitted their information faithfully to help others and that effort was stolen from them.

The Paper

Published in Case Reports in Oncology in May 2025, Makis et al. documented three patients with Stage IV cancers — breast, prostate, and melanoma — who achieved dramatic and durable remissions after incorporating fenbendazole into their treatment regimens. Two achieved complete remission. One near-complete remission. All three tolerated fenbendazole without any reported adverse effects. All three remained in remission through the entire follow-up period, ranging from 11 months to nearly three years (Makis et al., 2025).

The lead author was Dr. William Makis, an oncologist who has treated cancer patients with fenbendazole and other repurposed antiparasitic drugs. His paper passed peer review. It was accepted and published. It entered the medical literature.

And then it was retracted.

The “Reason” — and Why It Is Fabricated

The retraction was ordered by the journal’s Editor, Dr. Maurie Markman, on the grounds that Dr. Makis had an undeclared financial interest — specifically, that at the time of submission he offered services related to the topic of the study, i.e., he treats cancer patients with fenbendazole. The retraction statement noted that “the author’s response when contacted were found to be unsatisfactory” and concluded that “these concerns would have affected the interpretation of the work” (Case Reports in Oncology, 2026).

Read that again and let it sink in.

Fenbendazole is an off-patent, over-the-counter veterinary antiparasitic. It costs pennies per dose. No pharmaceutical company owns exclusive rights to it. No one profits handsomely from its use. As reviewed by Nguyen et al. (2024), fenbendazole’s patent expired in the early 1990s, making it available as a generic drug accessible through animal supply stores and online platforms. The “financial interest” claimed against Dr. Makis — a physician helping patients with a drug that generates essentially no revenue — is not just weak. It is nonsensical.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://tdefender.substack.com/p/cdc-je ... er-vaccine
CDC Jeopardized Health of ‘Millions of Americans’ by Failing to Warn of Stroke Risk After Pfizer Vaccine

New documents obtained by Sen. Ron Johnson reveal that health officials under the Biden administration downplayed COVID-19 vaccine safety risks and delayed warning the public.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/covid- ... f-the-most
COVID-19 “Vaccines”: One of the Most Catastrophic Medical Experiments in History
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher joins Navy SEAL David Rutherford to expose the origins and catastrophic consequences of the COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ddenly-2a8
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, March 16-March 23, 2026

Ex-FBI chief Robert Mueller; billionaire Leonid Radvinsky (43, C); actors Nicholas Brendon, Seth Peterson (28); TV producer Eric Overmyer; cohost Kiki Shepard (Showtime at the Apollo); & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ancer-gmas
Amanda Peet has breast cancer; GMA's Sam Champion has "sudden heart scare"; Perez Hilton in hospital with sepsis; Phillies' Daniel Robert has "cardiac event" in bullpen; IS: journo Oren Nahari has ALS

UK: TV's Jordan Brook has meningitis; sportscaster Danny Kelly has throat cancer; rugby star Abi Burton has encephalitis; AU: footie Jonathan Brown has "shock brain tumor diagnosis"; & more
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/2020 ... ir-of-1976
The fiasco of the 1976 ‘swine flu affair’
It was around 10:30 in the morning on 12 October 1976, and Imperato was at the Chelsea Health Clinic, an Art Deco building in the lower west side of Manhattan. The clinic was one of around 60 locations dotted around New York, preparing to vaccinate almost everyone in the city.

That year, fears of a swine flu pandemic had loomed large, so President Gerald Ford had ordered an unprecedented mass vaccination of everyone in the United States. As Imperato rolled up his sleeve, it was the first day of the effort in New York.

Imperato was deputy health commissioner and the chair of the task force charged with rolling out the programme in the city, so had volunteered to be photographed for the newspapers as he got his shot. The mayor of New York City, when asked, had refused, so Imperato had stepped up. Turnout was strong across the city that morning.

But what was meant to be a ceremonial opening and positive public relations effort would turn sour. That week, the papers had begun reporting troubling news from vaccine clinics in Pittsburgh: three apparently unexplained deaths due to heart attacks.

“I remember that day. I remember it vividly,” recalls Imperato. “I saw those headlines on the subway. And I said, ‘Good God. All hell is breaking loose here.’”

https://archive.org/stream/murder-by-in ... s_djvu.txt
In what is now known as "the Great Swine Flu Massacre," the
President of the United States, Gerald Ford, was enlisted to persuade
the public to undergo a national vaccination campaign. The moving
force behind the scheme was a $135 million windfall profit for the
major drug manufacturers. They had a "swine flu" vaccine which
suspicious pig raisers had refused to touch, fearful it might wipe out
their crop. The manufacturers had only tried to get $80 million from
the swine breeders; balked in this sale, they turned to the other
market, humans. The impetus for the national swine flu vaccine
came directly from the Disease Control Center in Atlanta, Georgia.
Perhaps coincidentally, Jimmy Carter, a member of the Trilateral
Commission, was then planning his presidential campaign in
Georgia. The incumbent President, Gerald Ford, had all the
advantages of a massive bureaucracy to aid him in his election
campaign, while the ineffectual and little known Jimmy Carter
offered no serious threat in the election. Suddenly, out of Atlanta,
came the Center of Disease Control plan for a national
immunization campaign against "swine flu." The fact that there was
not a single known case of this flu in the United States did not deter
the Medical Monopoly from their scheme. The swine breeders had
been shocked by the demonstrations of the vaccine on a few pigs,
which had collapsed and died. One can imagine the anxious
conferences in the headquarters of the great drug firms, until one
bright young man remarked, "Well, if the swine breeders won't
inject it into their animals, our only other market is to inject it into
people."


85



The Ford sponsored swine flu campaign almost died an early
death, when a conscientious public servant, Dr. Anthony Morris,
formerly of HEW and then active as director of the Virus Bureau at
the Food and Drug Administration, declared that there could be no
authentic swine flu vaccine, because there had never been any cases
of swine flu on which they could test it. Dr. Morris then went public
with his statement that "at no point were the swine flu vaccines
effective." He was promptly fired, but the damage had been done.
The damage control consisted of that great humanitarian, Walter
Cronkite, and the President of the United States, combining their
forces to come to the rescue of the Medical Monopoly. Walter
Cronkite had President Ford appear on his news program to urge the
American people to submit to the inoculation with the swine flu
vaccine. CBS then or later could never find any reason to air any
analysis or scientific critique of the swine flu vaccine, which was
identified as containing many toxic poisons, including alien viral
protein particles, formaldehyde, residues of chicken and egg embryo
substances, sucrose, theimorosal (a derivative of poisonous
mercury), polysorbate and some eighty other substances.

Meanwhile, back at the virus laboratories, after Dr. Anthony
Morris has been summarily fired, a special team of workers was
rushed in to clean out the four rooms in which he had conducted his
scientific tests. The laboratory was filled with animals whose
records verified his claims, representing some three years of
constant research. All of the animals were immediately destroyed,
and Morris' records were burned. They did not go so far as to sow
salt throughout the area, because they believed their job was done.

On April 15, 1976, Congress passed Public Faw 94-266, which
provided $135 million of taxpayers’ funds to pay for a national
swine flu inoculation campaign. HEW was to distribute the vaccine
to state and local health agencies on a national basis for inoculation,
at no charge. Insurance agencies then went public with their warning
that they would not insure drug firms against possible suits from the
results of swine flu inoculation, because no studies had been carried
out which could predict its effects. It was to foil the insurance
companies that CBS had Gerald Ford make his impassioned appeal
to 215,000,000 Americans to save themselves while there was still
time, and to rush down to the friendly local health department and
get the swine flu vaccination, at absolutely no charge. This may
have been CBS' finest hour in its distinguished career of "public
service."

Hardly had the swine flu campaign been completed than the
reports of the casualties began to pour in. Within a few months,
claims totalling $1.3 billion had been filed by victims who had
suffered paralysis from the swine flu vaccine. The medical
authorities proved equal to the challenge; they leaped to the defense
of the Medical Monopoly by labeling the new epidemic, "Guillain-
Barre Syndrome." There have since been increasing speculations
that the ensuing epidemic of AIDS which began shortly after Gerald
Ford's public assurances, was merely a viral variation of the swine


86



flu vaccine. And what of the perpetrator of the Great Swine Flu
Massacre, President Gerald Ford? As the logical person to blame for
the catastrophe, Ford had to endure a torrent of public criticism,
which quite naturally resulted in his defeat for election (he had
previously been appointed when the agents of the international drug
operations had ushered Richard Nixon out of office). The unknown
Jimmy Carter, familiar only to the supersecret fellow members in
the Trilateral Commission, was swept into office by the outpouring
of rage against Gerald Ford. Carter proved to be almost as serious a
national disaster as the swine flu epidemic, while Gerald Ford was
retired from politics to life. Not only did he lose the election; he was
also sentenced to spend his remaining years trudging wearily up and
down the hot sandy stretches of the Palm Springs Golf course.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest