Trump Admin to 'Re-engage' with Bill Gates' International Vaccine Syndicate Gavi After Kennedy Pulled Funding Last Year (Video)
Yes, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (via Gavi) funds the distribution of a specific version of the DTP vaccine in Africa that is no longer used or approved for infants in the United States.
The Frog Whisperer Was Right: What Atrazine Tells Us About Who Really Protects Your Family
Why a weed killer banned across Europe still flows from American taps, why the scientist who exposed it was hunted by the company that made it, and why the chemical you should worry about is not the one you eat but the one you drink.
There is a particular kind of American story that should make your blood run cold. It goes like this: a young scientist takes a job studying a chemical for the company that profits from it. He assumes he will find nothing. Instead, he finds something disturbing. And rather than fix the chemical, the company turns its machinery on the man.
Public Health, Gates Foundation, CEPI and WHO are no less evil than before
Remdesivir, mRNA and DNA experimental vaccines are planned for use in the Democratic Republic of Congo's Ebola outbreak
And this after an earlier Ebola study found the highest mortality rates when remdesivir was used.
Blame Tedros, Jeremy Farrar (aka 007, license to kill) and Bill Gates (both CEPI founders) for their blase attitude toward the lives of Africans. Jeremy is now #2 at WHO.
Predictably, Moderna has secured up to $60 million from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to accelerate development of an Ebola “vaccine” amid an ongoing outbreak in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, where there have been 282 confirmed cases, 42 deaths, and around 1,100 suspected cases, plus nine confirmed cases (one fatal) in Uganda.12
Vaccination Campaigns and Coverage Prior to 1930.
This post is a continuation of my series about the causes of chronic disease epidemic we are currently experiencing in the 21st century. In my previous articles, I have discussed that vaccines are by far the most significant driver of all serious chronic illness, and nearly 100% of it in children. I am currently focusing on cancer, the 2nd leading cause of death in the US after cardiovascular disease:
The report demonstrated that prior to the 19th century, cancer had not been the constant threatening presence of human life as we are lead to believe. In fact it was almost unheard of. However, mysteriously, during 19th century cancer rates rose from near absence to quite significant numbers. Even more mysteriously, it affected primarily “civilized” people, those who had access to the modern scientific medicine. As the Hoffman report demonstrated with actuarial precision, the rise of cancer over the span of the 19th century was a real trend, and NOT due to aging population, improved diagnostics, environmental/occupational exposure to toxic materials, and lack of medical care. It was often inversely correlated with racial differences (the “primitives” did not have cancer) and with socioeconomic differences (the relatively affluent classes had much more of it). The Hoffman report, despite its 800+ page volume, exactness and investigation of numerous possible factors, never mentioned the word “vaccine” even once. To me that looks like a tell - the authors already knew that vaccines were responsible. Numerous contemporaneous accounts of medical doctors confirm this. Doctors who practiced medicine instead of chasing profits via “gold standard science” knew what was killing people and animals - injection of poison from rotting putrid concoctions pushed as “protection”. Here are some illustrations of cancers developed from vaccination sites, late 1800s-early 1900s
The geographical distribution of refusal was highly uneven: in Leicester, the center of the English anti-vaccination movement, the share of infants exempted reached 80 to 90 per cent in the early 1900s, while in much of the rest of the country exemption rates remained in single figures[9]. The Leicester case is important because it falsifies the otherwise plausible inference that compulsion necessarily produces high coverage: the city achieved low smallpox mortality through isolation and notification (the ‘Leicester method’), with very little vaccination of infants.
A few weeks ago I emailed my bulldog breeder, from whom I recently acquired a puppy, the following: “The CDC is normalizing mandatory draconian rabies vaccines and microchipping of dogs so that their owners follow suit — this represents nothing more than the tightening of the dystopian technocratic screws for ever growing surveillance and deadly vaccine uptake for humans and their pets alike…”
Unsurprisingly, the breeder never replied to that email.
Vets are increasingly administering vaccines into K9 tails and legs knowing full well that these are the limbs that may be amputated when the animal eventually develops vaccine-induced tumors at said injection sites. That is anything but “safe and effective.” I recently spoke with a woman who was forced by her county every few years to inject her dog with the rabies vaccine, and her beloved pet developed a tumor in the neck (not so easy to amputate an entire neck); she explained that her astute vet contacted the vaccine manufacturer, who in turn sent their reps to diagnose the dog and concluded that they were responsible such that they ended up paying in full for all of the vet bills associated with the tumor removal.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests