As to that.NoOneImportant wrote:And whether all of the above may be true, or not,
If you are too lazy to even look it up for yourself, then that speaks volume's about the veracity of your posts.
As to that.NoOneImportant wrote:And whether all of the above may be true, or not,
The politicians of both parties are telling the voters that United States is the undisputed, one and only, super power of the world, and that no country will ever attack the United States with nuclear weapons. No need to even worry about it.NoOneImportant wrote: That era of an American dominated peace is being "fixed," by an American electorate no longer willing to, as Kennedy put it: "...bear any burden, pay any price..." in defense of freedom, neither at home nor abroad.
The leaders of a country generally reflect the electroate. So if the leadership are spendthrift vacuous and arrogant weaklings whats that say about the people who voted them in?Reality Check wrote:NoOneImportant wrote:
Those same politicians, of both parties, are also telling the voters that the current U.S. standard of living based on the U.S. government borrowing an additional 10% of the Gross Domestic Product each year, without paying anything back, can continue forever, plus or minus a few percentage points.
Those same politicians, of both parties, are also telling the voters that the trade deficits can continue forever and that fewer and fewer people working each year, even though the population continues to grow every year, is not a crisis.
So the American voters may be morons to believe the above, but they have not been given a choice about paying for a national defense or not, and the voters have not had the opportunity to make the choice you claim they have made.
Its not quite that simple. Germany was the pre-eminent power of its time culturally and, apart from Empire, militarily as well. One of the key root causes for WWI was when Germany decided to buck the pecking order of the world by building a fleet to challenge the British. Up until this point the UK was fine to let Germany continue to prosper economically and politically but they could not bear to see a consummate increase in Germany's ministry power by the most importent benchmark of the era - battleships. England then used its strength - a key one being diplomacy - to form a coalition against Germany to contain her.Reality Check wrote:.This would appear to be a much stronger analogy than World War II.John wrote:There is a striking analogy between China today and Germany before World War I.
From what I understand, what really caused World War I was Germany's strong, untested, belief in their own military superiority and the strong desire of the Germans to have an armed confrontation to prove it.
...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests