Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

[Guest]

If it happens, that's the point - they know this. Are you dumb? These aren't mutually exclusive.

Thanks for the bedtime story. Keep in mind that your bedtime stories seem more plausible in the evening after I've had a shot of whiskey, if it happens.

[Guest]

by Cool Breeze » Wed Feb 23, 2022 12:03 pm

BTC could drop to low 20s.

So that buy you made at 42K, are you going to sell it before it gets to low 20s? Or don't you trust your own prediction?

[Guest]

2021

What if there is just slow degradation and we all lament the shitty, anti-Consitution state of US affairs, but at least we have an out from monetary repression? If you are a GD guy and doomsayer, God is your only way out. He's the only way out anyway. If you all are wrong on the quality of the collapse (just bad decline, on and on) your future without BTC is much, much worse.

This is so obvious I would have let it go if you all weren't so insolent, but now I'll be dunking in your face when it gets to 100k and beyond.

2022

The design/desire is to make the next war attribute to 50% population reduction. They've tried a lot of things that haven't been successful, thank God, though.

by Cool Breeze » Wed Feb 23, 2022 12:03 pm

BTC could drop to low 20s.

What I am more concerned about is what is happening to the West. This is final stages of things and people barely know it.

That's quite a flip-flop. Care to explain the inconsistency and why you now seem to agree with the "doomsayers" on this board? Were the "doomsayers" right all along and you've now somehow suddenly seen the light?

[Guest]

And the there was this. Ah, yes... the voice of reason!

Now you're realizing why I am generally the voice of reason around here, even though I accept all probabilities (unlike most of the rest).

Notice how funny it is that if war doesn't come, "it's coming, it's a guarantee I just don't know when" is the same as "Bitcoin will go to zero, I just don't know when - but trust me"

[Cool Breeze]

Yet another person who doesn't understand what assigning probabilities to events, means.

I don't assign a 100% or a 0% probability to anything. Others around here do. Pay attention.

[Guest]

Yet another person who doesn't understand what assigning probabilities to events, means.

I don't assign a 100% or a 0% probability to anything. Others around here do. Pay attention.

You're just trying to find a way to say you're right all the time.

Bitcoin 100K or 20K? You can try to say you're right, but you have to make a decision. Buy or sell? It can't get to both prices first.

[Guest]

Also, Cool Breeze, can you tell me about how you're going to be punching your calculator assigning war probabilities after the nuclear missiles have been launched and they have 7 minutes to reach the blue city you're living in?

[Cool Breeze]

I'm not worried about that, since the first nuclear weapon that is set off, if it is, won't be the in the US

[Guest]

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists doomsday clock. Trending toward midnight for the past decade.

"Climate Change?"

A smart or wise person when he sees that doesn't take such a thing seriously. Pathetic.

Yes, because they're telling you something you don't want to hear. What they are telling you is the risk of nuclear war has never been higher.

[Guest]

I'm not worried about that, since the first nuclear weapon that is set off, if it is, won't be the in the US

Ah, 100% probability that it won't be in the US, I presume?