Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:57 pm
Bob Butler wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 10:55 pm
John has banned anti semitism from this board. Applause. Agreement. But should we disagree with all similar hatreds? Blacks? Latinos? Asians? Nazi? Non Nazi? I think I can suggest what most teachings of goodness would say, almost by definition. 'Love thy neighbor.' 'Do as you will, but harm none.' It would be a bit odd though for the Generational Dynamics site to take a stance against one of Generational Dynamics driving factors.
You use terms, like all lefties do, but can't define them or distort the meaning. That's why all of your posts are nonsense. That's how the left deceives. They first corrupt and then get reactions to bastardized terms. Example? "Anti-semitism". You can't even define it. Replace the word "whiteness" or white supremacy" in all headlines of the media these days with "jews" and what do you get? Calls from the ADL. So your hypocrisy betrays you. It's OK to talk disparagingly about other groups (not even true) but you can't criticize your masters, which is the point and the point has been proven.
I don't recall you posting on your candidate calling people "deplorables" and worse. I wonder why. Checkmate.
It is not so much that I can’t define a term, but that you refuse to accept the definition. Man has an instinct to hate, oppress and control others. Leaders have taken advantage of it over the years. Anti semitism was practiced by Hitler’s crowd among others, but other groups have been victims as well. Blacks by the KKK. The Chinese by the Japanese at the Marco Polo bridge. You can refuse to see the effect, to understand the definition, but can you really not understand the history of such events? Do you have to deny the reality of the definitions for your wild theorizing to be true?
Jews have mostly not tried to oppress others. They were not the dominant group in any territory for years, not since Roman times. Since 1948 they have been dominant in Israel, and started to oppress the Palestinians, but that doesn’t much affect most Jews here. The Whites in America have been dominant for centuries. Most newly come immigrant groups, not to mention the natives, have had problems of some sort, blacks being lynched, natives keeping lands, asians bringing their women over, Irish finding jobs. You swap the two terms of Jew and white and find one headline is false, the other true. Of course the response is different.
I did make a comment on Hillary calling people deplorable, namely that what she said was not politic, but was absolutely correct. Not sure if the comment was on this board or another similar site. At any rate, how does that statement involve a checkmate? How does willfully refusing a definition without providing an alternative get us anywhere?
At any rate, groups of men tend to hate other groups of men. This tendency to hate the other is at the core of Generational Dynamics. This is against most ‘teachings of goodness’. I understood John’s declaration against anti semitism as a good thing, and only wonder why he chose that particular prejudice and not others. Did you not understand his declaration?
